From 8fc37ec54cd8e37193b0d42809b785ff19661c34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:18:15 +0400 Subject: don't expose I_NEW inodes via dentry->d_inode d_instantiate(dentry, inode); unlock_new_inode(inode); is a bad idea; do it the other way round... Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/jffs2/dir.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/jffs2') diff --git a/fs/jffs2/dir.c b/fs/jffs2/dir.c index 23245191c5b5..ad7774d32095 100644 --- a/fs/jffs2/dir.c +++ b/fs/jffs2/dir.c @@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ static int jffs2_create(struct inode *dir_i, struct dentry *dentry, __func__, inode->i_ino, inode->i_mode, inode->i_nlink, f->inocache->pino_nlink, inode->i_mapping->nrpages); - d_instantiate(dentry, inode); unlock_new_inode(inode); + d_instantiate(dentry, inode); return 0; fail: @@ -446,8 +446,8 @@ static int jffs2_symlink (struct inode *dir_i, struct dentry *dentry, const char mutex_unlock(&dir_f->sem); jffs2_complete_reservation(c); - d_instantiate(dentry, inode); unlock_new_inode(inode); + d_instantiate(dentry, inode); return 0; fail: @@ -591,8 +591,8 @@ static int jffs2_mkdir (struct inode *dir_i, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode mutex_unlock(&dir_f->sem); jffs2_complete_reservation(c); - d_instantiate(dentry, inode); unlock_new_inode(inode); + d_instantiate(dentry, inode); return 0; fail: @@ -766,8 +766,8 @@ static int jffs2_mknod (struct inode *dir_i, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode mutex_unlock(&dir_f->sem); jffs2_complete_reservation(c); - d_instantiate(dentry, inode); unlock_new_inode(inode); + d_instantiate(dentry, inode); return 0; fail: -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b