From 01e03bdc745bf2b86fadfc44e57512fd39f9d54f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 21:18:44 -0500 Subject: NFS: Mark expected switch fall-throughs In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Warning level 2 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker --- fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'fs/nfs/blocklayout') diff --git a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c index 7cb5c38c19e4..06cb0c1d9aee 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c +++ b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c @@ -753,6 +753,7 @@ out: case -ENODEV: /* Our extent block devices are unavailable */ set_bit(NFS_LSEG_UNAVAILABLE, &lseg->pls_flags); + /* Fall through */ case 0: return lseg; default: -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b