From 6cc98d90f8d14f8ebce2391323929024d7eef39f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 16:19:21 -0500 Subject: Btrfs: fix assert screwup for the pending move stuff Wang noticed that he was failing btrfs/030 even though me and Filipe couldn't reproduce. Turns out this is because Wang didn't have CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT set, which meant that a key part of Filipe's original patch was not being built in. This appears to be a mess up with merging Filipe's patch as it does not exist in his original patch. Fix this by changing how we make sure del_waiting_dir_move asserts that it did not error and take the function out of the ifdef check. This makes btrfs/030 pass with the assert on or off. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/send.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/send.c b/fs/btrfs/send.c index cf9107a64204..9c8d1a3fdc3a 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/send.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c @@ -2774,8 +2774,6 @@ static int add_waiting_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino) return 0; } -#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT - static int del_waiting_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino) { struct rb_node *n = sctx->waiting_dir_moves.rb_node; @@ -2796,8 +2794,6 @@ static int del_waiting_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino) return -ENOENT; } -#endif - static int add_pending_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 parent_ino) { struct rb_node **p = &sctx->pending_dir_moves.rb_node; @@ -2902,7 +2898,9 @@ static int apply_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct pending_dir_move *pm) } sctx->send_progress = sctx->cur_ino + 1; - ASSERT(del_waiting_dir_move(sctx, pm->ino) == 0); + ret = del_waiting_dir_move(sctx, pm->ino); + ASSERT(ret == 0); + ret = get_cur_path(sctx, pm->ino, pm->gen, to_path); if (ret < 0) goto out; -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b