From 7fd1a3f73f3743b4ffd520effe288a70b0ec47c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:18:41 -0400 Subject: Btrfs: hold a ref on the inode during writepages We can race with unlink and not actually be able to do our igrab in btrfs_add_ordered_extent. This will result in all sorts of problems. Instead of doing the complicated work to try and handle returning an error properly from btrfs_add_ordered_extent, just hold a ref to the inode during writepages. If we cannot grab a ref we know we're freeing this inode anyway and can just drop the dirty pages on the floor, because screw them we're going to invalidate them anyway. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index aaa12c1eb348..01c21b6c6d43 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -3324,6 +3324,7 @@ static int extent_write_cache_pages(struct extent_io_tree *tree, writepage_t writepage, void *data, void (*flush_fn)(void *)) { + struct inode *inode = mapping->host; int ret = 0; int done = 0; int nr_to_write_done = 0; @@ -3334,6 +3335,18 @@ static int extent_write_cache_pages(struct extent_io_tree *tree, int scanned = 0; int tag; + /* + * We have to hold onto the inode so that ordered extents can do their + * work when the IO finishes. The alternative to this is failing to add + * an ordered extent if the igrab() fails there and that is a huge pain + * to deal with, so instead just hold onto the inode throughout the + * writepages operation. If it fails here we are freeing up the inode + * anyway and we'd rather not waste our time writing out stuff that is + * going to be truncated anyway. + */ + if (!igrab(inode)) + return 0; + pagevec_init(&pvec, 0); if (wbc->range_cyclic) { index = mapping->writeback_index; /* Start from prev offset */ @@ -3428,6 +3441,7 @@ retry: index = 0; goto retry; } + btrfs_add_delayed_iput(inode); return ret; } -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b