From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h') diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h b/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h index dda39d8fa189..b717ed9d2b75 100644 --- a/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h +++ b/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h @@ -25,13 +25,13 @@ struct arch_timer_kvm { /* Virtual offset */ - cycle_t cntvoff; + u64 cntvoff; }; struct arch_timer_cpu { /* Registers: control register, timer value */ u32 cntv_ctl; /* Saved/restored */ - cycle_t cntv_cval; /* Saved/restored */ + u64 cntv_cval; /* Saved/restored */ /* * Anything that is not used directly from assembly code goes -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b