From 7270d11c56f594af4d166b2988421cd8ed933dc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:11:52 +0100 Subject: arm/bL_switcher: Kill tick suspend hackery Use the new tick_suspend/resume_local() and get rid of the homebrewn implementation of these in the ARM bL switcher. The check for the cpumask is completely pointless. There is no harm to suspend a per cpu tick device unconditionally. If that's a real issue then we fix it proper at the core level and not with some completely undocumented hacks in some random core code. Move the tick internals to the core code, now that this nuisance is gone. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner [ rjw: Rebase, changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Russell King Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1655112.Ws17YsMfN7@vostro.rjw.lan Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- include/linux/clockchips.h | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/linux/clockchips.h') diff --git a/include/linux/clockchips.h b/include/linux/clockchips.h index 50ce9750754f..3ac7e2d90374 100644 --- a/include/linux/clockchips.h +++ b/include/linux/clockchips.h @@ -198,12 +198,6 @@ clockevents_calc_mult_shift(struct clock_event_device *ce, u32 freq, u32 minsec) freq, minsec); } -/* Should be core only, but is abused by arm bl_switcher */ -extern void clockevents_set_state(struct clock_event_device *dev, - enum clock_event_state state); -extern int clockevents_program_event(struct clock_event_device *dev, - ktime_t expires, bool force); - extern void clockevents_suspend(void); extern void clockevents_resume(void); -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b