From fb0258730ad554db531f12fc1c3d5a5234fe52a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Pitre Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:03:19 +0100 Subject: [MTD] Don't let gcc inline functions marked __xipram If they get inlined into non __xipram functions we're screwed. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- include/linux/mtd/xip.h | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/linux/mtd/xip.h') diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/xip.h b/include/linux/mtd/xip.h index 7b7deef6b180..863fa5a1d24e 100644 --- a/include/linux/mtd/xip.h +++ b/include/linux/mtd/xip.h @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as * published by the Free Software Foundation. * - * $Id: xip.h,v 1.2 2004/12/01 15:49:10 nico Exp $ + * $Id: xip.h,v 1.4 2005/10/17 21:03:16 nico Exp $ */ #ifndef __LINUX_MTD_XIP_H__ @@ -22,19 +22,19 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_MTD_XIP -/* - * Function that are modifying the flash state away from array mode must - * obviously not be running from flash. The __xipram is therefore marking - * those functions so they get relocated to ram. - */ -#define __xipram __attribute__ ((__section__ (".data"))) - /* * We really don't want gcc to guess anything. * We absolutely _need_ proper inlining. */ #include +/* + * Function that are modifying the flash state away from array mode must + * obviously not be running from flash. The __xipram is therefore marking + * those functions so they get relocated to ram. + */ +#define __xipram noinline __attribute__ ((__section__ (".data"))) + /* * Each architecture has to provide the following macros. They must access * the hardware directly and not rely on any other (XIP) functions since they -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b