From 924b290655c0f17ac84e752addfc9bc3ec361069 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 13:47:40 -0700 Subject: xfrm: convert alg_key to flexible array member MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Iproute2 build generates a warning when built with gcc-12. This is because the alg_key in xfrm.h API has zero size array element instead of flexible array. CC xfrm_state.o In function ‘xfrm_algo_parse’, inlined from ‘xfrm_state_modify.constprop’ at xfrm_state.c:573:5: xfrm_state.c:162:32: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=] 162 | buf[j] = val; | ~~~~~~~^~~~~ This patch convert the alg_key into flexible array member. There are other zero size arrays here that should be converted as well. This patch is RFC only since it is only compile tested and passes trivial iproute2 tests. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger Acked-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert --- include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/uapi/linux') diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h b/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h index 65e13a099b1a..3ed61df9cc91 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h @@ -102,21 +102,21 @@ struct xfrm_replay_state_esn { struct xfrm_algo { char alg_name[64]; unsigned int alg_key_len; /* in bits */ - char alg_key[0]; + char alg_key[]; }; struct xfrm_algo_auth { char alg_name[64]; unsigned int alg_key_len; /* in bits */ unsigned int alg_trunc_len; /* in bits */ - char alg_key[0]; + char alg_key[]; }; struct xfrm_algo_aead { char alg_name[64]; unsigned int alg_key_len; /* in bits */ unsigned int alg_icv_len; /* in bits */ - char alg_key[0]; + char alg_key[]; }; struct xfrm_stats { -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From 5e25c25aa2c08fb9a79476e029c0b1e3dcd70566 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Vaněk Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 16:27:20 +0200 Subject: xfrm: improve wording of comment above XFRM_OFFLOAD flags MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I have noticed a few minor wording issues in a comment recently added above XFRM_OFFLOAD flags in 7c76ecd9c99b ("xfrm: enforce validity of offload input flags"). Signed-off-by: Petr Vaněk Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert --- include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/uapi/linux') diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h b/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h index 3ed61df9cc91..7929bf9cbee4 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h @@ -511,9 +511,9 @@ struct xfrm_user_offload { int ifindex; __u8 flags; }; -/* This flag was exposed without any kernel code that supporting it. - * Unfortunately, strongswan has the code that uses sets this flag, - * which makes impossible to reuse this bit. +/* This flag was exposed without any kernel code that supports it. + * Unfortunately, strongswan has the code that sets this flag, + * which makes it impossible to reuse this bit. * * So leave it here to make sure that it won't be reused by mistake. */ -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b