From 6a20dbd6caa2358716136144bf524331d70b1e03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Manfred Schlaegl Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:42:04 +0200 Subject: tty: Fix race condition between __tty_buffer_request_room and flush_to_ldisc The race was introduced while development of linux-3.11 by e8437d7ecbc50198705331449367d401ebb3181f and e9975fdec0138f1b2a85b9624e41660abd9865d4. Originally it was found and reproduced on linux-3.12.15 and linux-3.12.15-rt25, by sending 500 byte blocks with 115kbaud to the target uart in a loop with 100 milliseconds delay. In short: 1. The consumer flush_to_ldisc is on to remove the head tty_buffer. 2. The producer adds a number of bytes, so that a new tty_buffer must be allocated and added by __tty_buffer_request_room. 3. The consumer removes the head tty_buffer element, without handling newly committed data. Detailed example: * Initial buffer: * Head, Tail -> 0: used=250; commit=250; read=240; next=NULL * Consumer: ''flush_to_ldisc'' * consumed 10 Byte * buffer: * Head, Tail -> 0: used=250; commit=250; read=250; next=NULL {{{ count = head->commit - head->read; // count = 0 if (!count) { // enter // INTERRUPTED BY PRODUCER -> if (head->next == NULL) break; buf->head = head->next; tty_buffer_free(port, head); continue; } }}} * Producer: tty_insert_flip_... 10 bytes + tty_flip_buffer_push * buffer: * Head, Tail -> 0: used=250; commit=250; read=250; next=NULL * added 6 bytes: head-element filled to maximum. * buffer: * Head, Tail -> 0: used=256; commit=250; read=250; next=NULL * added 4 bytes: __tty_buffer_request_room is called * buffer: * Head -> 0: used=256; commit=256; read=250; next=1 * Tail -> 1: used=4; commit=0; read=250 next=NULL * push (tty_flip_buffer_push) * buffer: * Head -> 0: used=256; commit=256; read=250; next=1 * Tail -> 1: used=4; commit=4; read=250 next=NULL * Consumer {{{ count = head->commit - head->read; if (!count) { // INTERRUPTED BY PRODUCER <- if (head->next == NULL) // -> no break break; buf->head = head->next; tty_buffer_free(port, head); // ERROR: tty_buffer head freed -> 6 bytes lost continue; } }}} This patch reintroduces a spin_lock to protect this case. Perhaps later a lock-less solution could be found. Signed-off-by: Manfred Schlaegl Cc: stable # 3.11 Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- include/linux/tty.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'include') diff --git a/include/linux/tty.h b/include/linux/tty.h index 1c3316a47d7e..036cccd80d9f 100644 --- a/include/linux/tty.h +++ b/include/linux/tty.h @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ struct tty_bufhead { struct tty_buffer *head; /* Queue head */ struct work_struct work; struct mutex lock; + spinlock_t flush_lock; atomic_t priority; struct tty_buffer sentinel; struct llist_head free; /* Free queue head */ -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b