From 47e5d8f9ed34a5310f45f48bbc15f1e61d83b6db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thiago Jung Bauermann Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 01:49:15 -0300 Subject: swiotlb: Remove call to sme_active() sme_active() is an x86-specific function so it's better not to call it from generic code. There's no need to mention which memory encryption feature is active, so just use a more generic message. Besides, other architectures will have different names for similar technology. Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190806044919.10622-3-bauerman@linux.ibm.com --- kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/dma/swiotlb.c') diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c index 9de232229063..f29caad71e13 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c @@ -461,8 +461,7 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev, panic("Can not allocate SWIOTLB buffer earlier and can't now provide you with the DMA bounce buffer"); if (mem_encrypt_active()) - pr_warn_once("%s is active and system is using DMA bounce buffers\n", - sme_active() ? "SME" : "SEV"); + pr_warn_once("Memory encryption is active and system is using DMA bounce buffers\n"); mask = dma_get_seg_boundary(hwdev); -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b