From 1e02cd40f15190b78fcc6b3f50c952fb4028e9a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 15:39:24 +0100 Subject: perf/core: Fix the unthrottle logic Its possible to IOC_PERIOD while the event is throttled, this would re-start the event and the next tick would then try to unthrottle it, and find the event wasn't actually stopped anymore. This would tickle a WARN in the x86-pmu code which isn't expecting to start a !stopped event. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Brian Gerst Cc: David Ahern Cc: Denys Vlasenko Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Cc: dvyukov@google.com Cc: oleg@redhat.com Cc: panand@redhat.com Cc: sasha.levin@oracle.com Cc: vince@deater.net Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160310143924.GR6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/events/core.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index 712570dddacd..d39477390415 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -4210,6 +4210,14 @@ static void __perf_event_period(struct perf_event *event, active = (event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE); if (active) { perf_pmu_disable(ctx->pmu); + /* + * We could be throttled; unthrottle now to avoid the tick + * trying to unthrottle while we already re-started the event. + */ + if (event->hw.interrupts == MAX_INTERRUPTS) { + event->hw.interrupts = 0; + perf_log_throttle(event, 1); + } event->pmu->stop(event, PERF_EF_UPDATE); } -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b