From e3728b50cd9be7d4b1469447cdf1feb93e3b7adb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 10:11:02 +0100 Subject: ACPI: PM: s2idle: Avoid possible race related to the EC GPE It is theoretically possible for the ACPI EC GPE to be set after the s2idle_ops->wake() called from s2idle_loop() has returned and before the subsequent pm_wakeup_pending() check is carried out. If that happens, the resulting wakeup event will cause the system to resume even though it may be a spurious one. To avoid that race, first make the ->wake() callback in struct platform_s2idle_ops return a bool value indicating whether or not to let the system resume and rearrange s2idle_loop() to use that value instad of the direct pm_wakeup_pending() call if ->wake() is present. Next, rework acpi_s2idle_wake() to process EC events and check pm_wakeup_pending() before re-arming the SCI for system wakeup to prevent it from triggering prematurely and add comments to that function to explain the rationale for the new code flow. Fixes: 56b991849009 ("PM: sleep: Simplify suspend-to-idle control flow") Cc: 5.4+ # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- kernel/power/suspend.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/power/suspend.c b/kernel/power/suspend.c index 2c47280fbfc7..8b1bb5ee7e5d 100644 --- a/kernel/power/suspend.c +++ b/kernel/power/suspend.c @@ -131,11 +131,12 @@ static void s2idle_loop(void) * to avoid them upfront. */ for (;;) { - if (s2idle_ops && s2idle_ops->wake) - s2idle_ops->wake(); - - if (pm_wakeup_pending()) + if (s2idle_ops && s2idle_ops->wake) { + if (s2idle_ops->wake()) + break; + } else if (pm_wakeup_pending()) { break; + } pm_wakeup_clear(false); -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b