From c8446b75be6f85b3d40066922876cb7adc948afb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frederic Weisbecker Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:33:54 +0100 Subject: irq_work: Fix racy IRQ_WORK_BUSY flag setting The IRQ_WORK_BUSY flag is set right before we execute the work. Once this flag value is set, the work enters a claimable state again. So if we have specific data to compute in our work, we ensure it's either handled by another CPU or locally by enqueuing the work again. This state machine is guanranteed by atomic operations on the flags. So when we set IRQ_WORK_BUSY without using an xchg-like operation, we break this guarantee as in the following summarized scenario: CPU 1 CPU 2 ----- ----- (flags = 0) old_flags = flags; (flags = 0) cmpxchg(flags, old_flags, old_flags | IRQ_WORK_FLAGS) (flags = 3) [...] flags = IRQ_WORK_BUSY (flags = 2) func() (sees flags = 3) cmpxchg(flags, old_flags, old_flags | IRQ_WORK_FLAGS) (give up) cmpxchg(flags, 2, 0); (flags = 0) CPU 1 claims a work and executes it, so it sets IRQ_WORK_BUSY and the work is again in a claimable state. Now CPU 2 has new data to process and try to claim that work but it may see a stale value of the flags and think the work is still pending somewhere that will handle our data. This is because CPU 1 doesn't set IRQ_WORK_BUSY atomically. As a result, the data expected to be handle by CPU 2 won't get handled. To fix this, use xchg() to set IRQ_WORK_BUSY, this way we ensure the CPU 2 will see the correct value with cmpxchg() using the expected ordering. Changelog-heavily-inspired-by: Steven Rostedt Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Acked-by: Steven Rostedt Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Paul Gortmaker Cc: Anish Kumar --- kernel/irq_work.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c index 1588e3b2871b..57be1a6cd8da 100644 --- a/kernel/irq_work.c +++ b/kernel/irq_work.c @@ -119,8 +119,11 @@ void irq_work_run(void) /* * Clear the PENDING bit, after this point the @work * can be re-used. + * Make it immediately visible so that other CPUs trying + * to claim that work don't rely on us to handle their data + * while we are in the middle of the func. */ - work->flags = IRQ_WORK_BUSY; + xchg(&work->flags, IRQ_WORK_BUSY); work->func(work); /* * Clear the BUSY bit and return to the free state if -- cgit v1.3-14-g43fede From e0bbe2d80c415bd4063d894ec2ccb336788af814 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frederic Weisbecker Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 15:21:36 +0200 Subject: irq_work: Fix racy check on work pending flag Work claiming wants to be SMP-safe. And by the time we try to claim a work, if it is already executing concurrently on another CPU, we want to succeed the claiming and queue the work again because the other CPU may have missed the data we wanted to handle in our work if it's about to complete there. This scenario is summarized below: CPU 1 CPU 2 ----- ----- (flags = 0) cmpxchg(flags, 0, IRQ_WORK_FLAGS) (flags = 3) [...] xchg(flags, IRQ_WORK_BUSY) (flags = 2) func() if (flags & IRQ_WORK_PENDING) (not true) cmpxchg(flags, flags, IRQ_WORK_FLAGS) (flags = 3) [...] cmpxchg(flags, IRQ_WORK_BUSY, 0); (fail, pending on CPU 2) This state machine is synchronized using [cmp]xchg() on the flags. As such, the early IRQ_WORK_PENDING check in CPU 2 above is racy. By the time we check it, we may be dealing with a stale value because we aren't using an atomic accessor. As a result, CPU 2 may "see" that the work is still pending on another CPU while it may be actually completing the work function exection already, leaving our data unprocessed. To fix this, we start by speculating about the value we wish to be in the work->flags but we only make any conclusion after the value returned by the cmpxchg() call that either claims the work or let the current owner handle the pending work for us. Changelog-heavily-inspired-by: Steven Rostedt Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Acked-by: Steven Rostedt Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Paul Gortmaker Cc: Anish Kumar --- kernel/irq_work.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c index 57be1a6cd8da..64eddd59ed83 100644 --- a/kernel/irq_work.c +++ b/kernel/irq_work.c @@ -34,15 +34,21 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct llist_head, irq_work_list); */ static bool irq_work_claim(struct irq_work *work) { - unsigned long flags, nflags; + unsigned long flags, oflags, nflags; + /* + * Start with our best wish as a premise but only trust any + * flag value after cmpxchg() result. + */ + flags = work->flags & ~IRQ_WORK_PENDING; for (;;) { - flags = work->flags; - if (flags & IRQ_WORK_PENDING) - return false; nflags = flags | IRQ_WORK_FLAGS; - if (cmpxchg(&work->flags, flags, nflags) == flags) + oflags = cmpxchg(&work->flags, flags, nflags); + if (oflags == flags) break; + if (oflags & IRQ_WORK_PENDING) + return false; + flags = oflags; cpu_relax(); } -- cgit v1.3-14-g43fede