From 6f817f4cda68b09621312ec5ba84217bc5e37b3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vladimir Davydov Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 15:28:47 -0700 Subject: memcg: move memcg_update_cache_size() to slab_common.c `While growing per memcg caches arrays, we jump between memcontrol.c and slab_common.c in a weird way: memcg_alloc_cache_id - memcontrol.c memcg_update_all_caches - slab_common.c memcg_update_cache_size - memcontrol.c There's absolutely no reason why memcg_update_cache_size can't live on the slab's side though. So let's move it there and settle it comfortably amid per-memcg cache allocation functions. Besides, this patch cleans this function up a bit, removing all the useless comments from it, and renames it to memcg_update_cache_params to conform to memcg_alloc/free_cache_params, which we already have in slab_common.c. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov Acked-by: Johannes Weiner Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Christoph Lameter Cc: Glauber Costa Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Pekka Enberg Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/memcontrol.c | 49 ------------------------------------------------- mm/slab_common.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) (limited to 'mm') diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index ef4fbc5e4ca3..fff511e25bb2 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -2958,55 +2958,6 @@ void memcg_update_array_size(int num) memcg_limited_groups_array_size = num; } -int memcg_update_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *s, int num_groups) -{ - struct memcg_cache_params *cur_params = s->memcg_params; - struct memcg_cache_params *new_params; - size_t size; - int i; - - VM_BUG_ON(!is_root_cache(s)); - - size = num_groups * sizeof(void *); - size += offsetof(struct memcg_cache_params, memcg_caches); - - new_params = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); - if (!new_params) - return -ENOMEM; - - new_params->is_root_cache = true; - - /* - * There is the chance it will be bigger than - * memcg_limited_groups_array_size, if we failed an allocation - * in a cache, in which case all caches updated before it, will - * have a bigger array. - * - * But if that is the case, the data after - * memcg_limited_groups_array_size is certainly unused - */ - for (i = 0; i < memcg_limited_groups_array_size; i++) { - if (!cur_params->memcg_caches[i]) - continue; - new_params->memcg_caches[i] = - cur_params->memcg_caches[i]; - } - - /* - * Ideally, we would wait until all caches succeed, and only - * then free the old one. But this is not worth the extra - * pointer per-cache we'd have to have for this. - * - * It is not a big deal if some caches are left with a size - * bigger than the others. And all updates will reset this - * anyway. - */ - rcu_assign_pointer(s->memcg_params, new_params); - if (cur_params) - kfree_rcu(cur_params, rcu_head); - return 0; -} - static void memcg_register_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct kmem_cache *root_cache) { diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c index c2a8661f8b81..3a6e0cfdf03a 100644 --- a/mm/slab_common.c +++ b/mm/slab_common.c @@ -148,6 +148,33 @@ static void memcg_free_cache_params(struct kmem_cache *s) kfree(s->memcg_params); } +static int memcg_update_cache_params(struct kmem_cache *s, int num_memcgs) +{ + int size; + struct memcg_cache_params *new_params, *cur_params; + + BUG_ON(!is_root_cache(s)); + + size = offsetof(struct memcg_cache_params, memcg_caches); + size += num_memcgs * sizeof(void *); + + new_params = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!new_params) + return -ENOMEM; + + cur_params = s->memcg_params; + memcpy(new_params->memcg_caches, cur_params->memcg_caches, + memcg_limited_groups_array_size * sizeof(void *)); + + new_params->is_root_cache = true; + + rcu_assign_pointer(s->memcg_params, new_params); + if (cur_params) + kfree_rcu(cur_params, rcu_head); + + return 0; +} + int memcg_update_all_caches(int num_memcgs) { struct kmem_cache *s; @@ -158,9 +185,8 @@ int memcg_update_all_caches(int num_memcgs) if (!is_root_cache(s)) continue; - ret = memcg_update_cache_size(s, num_memcgs); + ret = memcg_update_cache_params(s, num_memcgs); /* - * See comment in memcontrol.c, memcg_update_cache_size: * Instead of freeing the memory, we'll just leave the caches * up to this point in an updated state. */ -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b