From 3f926af3f4d688e2e11e7f8ed04e277a14d4d4a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 22:44:51 -0700 Subject: net: use skb_queue_empty_lockless() in busy poll contexts Busy polling usually runs without locks. Let's use skb_queue_empty_lockless() instead of skb_queue_empty() Also uses READ_ONCE() in __skb_try_recv_datagram() to address a similar potential problem. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/core/sock.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'net/core/sock.c') diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index a515392ba84b..b8e758bcb6ad 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -3600,7 +3600,7 @@ bool sk_busy_loop_end(void *p, unsigned long start_time) { struct sock *sk = p; - return !skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue) || + return !skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sk->sk_receive_queue) || sk_busy_loop_timeout(sk, start_time); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_busy_loop_end); -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b