From 0cc217e16cb8ca8ef2544363571fce94259900e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:10:06 -0700 Subject: [IPV4]: When possible test for IFF_LOOPBACK and not dev == loopback_dev Now that multiple loopback devices are becoming possible it makes the code a little cleaner and more maintainable to test if a deivice is th a loopback device by testing dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK instead of dev == loopback_dev. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c') diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c b/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c index 74503267e5d4..fbca2a2ff29f 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c +++ b/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c @@ -961,7 +961,7 @@ ip_vs_in(unsigned int hooknum, struct sk_buff **pskb, * ... don't know why 1st test DOES NOT include 2nd (?) */ if (unlikely(skb->pkt_type != PACKET_HOST - || skb->dev == loopback_dev || skb->sk)) { + || skb->dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK || skb->sk)) { IP_VS_DBG(12, "packet type=%d proto=%d daddr=%d.%d.%d.%d ignored\n", skb->pkt_type, ip_hdr(skb)->protocol, -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b