From 3ef7cf57c72f32f61e97f8fa401bc39ea1f1a5d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 22:44:50 -0700 Subject: net: use skb_queue_empty_lockless() in poll() handlers Many poll() handlers are lockless. Using skb_queue_empty_lockless() instead of skb_queue_empty() is more appropriate. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/sctp/socket.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/sctp/socket.c') diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c index 5ca0ec0e823c..cfb25391b8b0 100644 --- a/net/sctp/socket.c +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c @@ -8476,7 +8476,7 @@ __poll_t sctp_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, poll_table *wait) mask = 0; /* Is there any exceptional events? */ - if (sk->sk_err || !skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_error_queue)) + if (sk->sk_err || !skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sk->sk_error_queue)) mask |= EPOLLERR | (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_SELECT_ERR_QUEUE) ? EPOLLPRI : 0); if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) @@ -8485,7 +8485,7 @@ __poll_t sctp_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, poll_table *wait) mask |= EPOLLHUP; /* Is it readable? Reconsider this code with TCP-style support. */ - if (!skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) + if (!skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) mask |= EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM; /* The association is either gone or not ready. */ -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b