From acf568ee859f098279eadf551612f103afdacb4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:40:44 +1100
Subject: xfrm: Reinject transport-mode packets through tasklet

This is an old bugbear of mine:

https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg03894.html

By crafting special packets, it is possible to cause recursion
in our kernel when processing transport-mode packets at levels
that are only limited by packet size.

The easiest one is with DNAT, but an even worse one is where
UDP encapsulation is used in which case you just have to insert
an UDP encapsulation header in between each level of recursion.

This patch avoids this problem by reinjecting tranport-mode packets
through a tasklet.

Fixes: b05e106698d9 ("[IPV4/6]: Netfilter IPsec input hooks")
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)

(limited to 'net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c')

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
index da6447389ffb..3f6f6f8c9fa5 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
@@ -8,15 +8,29 @@
  *
  */
 
+#include <linux/bottom_half.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/netdevice.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <net/dst.h>
 #include <net/ip.h>
 #include <net/xfrm.h>
 #include <net/ip_tunnels.h>
 #include <net/ip6_tunnel.h>
 
+struct xfrm_trans_tasklet {
+	struct tasklet_struct tasklet;
+	struct sk_buff_head queue;
+};
+
+struct xfrm_trans_cb {
+	int (*finish)(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
+};
+
+#define XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(__skb) ((struct xfrm_trans_cb *)&((__skb)->cb[0]))
+
 static struct kmem_cache *secpath_cachep __read_mostly;
 
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(xfrm_input_afinfo_lock);
@@ -25,6 +39,8 @@ static struct xfrm_input_afinfo const __rcu *xfrm_input_afinfo[AF_INET6 + 1];
 static struct gro_cells gro_cells;
 static struct net_device xfrm_napi_dev;
 
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct xfrm_trans_tasklet, xfrm_trans_tasklet);
+
 int xfrm_input_register_afinfo(const struct xfrm_input_afinfo *afinfo)
 {
 	int err = 0;
@@ -477,9 +493,41 @@ int xfrm_input_resume(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_input_resume);
 
+static void xfrm_trans_reinject(unsigned long data)
+{
+	struct xfrm_trans_tasklet *trans = (void *)data;
+	struct sk_buff_head queue;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+	__skb_queue_head_init(&queue);
+	skb_queue_splice_init(&trans->queue, &queue);
+
+	while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&queue)))
+		XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->finish(dev_net(skb->dev), NULL, skb);
+}
+
+int xfrm_trans_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
+		     int (*finish)(struct net *, struct sock *,
+				   struct sk_buff *))
+{
+	struct xfrm_trans_tasklet *trans;
+
+	trans = this_cpu_ptr(&xfrm_trans_tasklet);
+
+	if (skb_queue_len(&trans->queue) >= netdev_max_backlog)
+		return -ENOBUFS;
+
+	XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->finish = finish;
+	skb_queue_tail(&trans->queue, skb);
+	tasklet_schedule(&trans->tasklet);
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_trans_queue);
+
 void __init xfrm_input_init(void)
 {
 	int err;
+	int i;
 
 	init_dummy_netdev(&xfrm_napi_dev);
 	err = gro_cells_init(&gro_cells, &xfrm_napi_dev);
@@ -490,4 +538,13 @@ void __init xfrm_input_init(void)
 					   sizeof(struct sec_path),
 					   0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN|SLAB_PANIC,
 					   NULL);
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
+		struct xfrm_trans_tasklet *trans;
+
+		trans = &per_cpu(xfrm_trans_tasklet, i);
+		__skb_queue_head_init(&trans->queue);
+		tasklet_init(&trans->tasklet, xfrm_trans_reinject,
+			     (unsigned long)trans);
+	}
 }
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b