From 25985edcedea6396277003854657b5f3cb31a628 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lucas De Marchi Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:57:33 -0300 Subject: Fix common misspellings Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed. Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi --- net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/xfrm') diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c index 3d15d3e1b2c4..5d1d60d3ca83 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c @@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ static int build_spdinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net *net, u32 *f; nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, pid, seq, XFRM_MSG_NEWSPDINFO, sizeof(u32), 0); - if (nlh == NULL) /* shouldnt really happen ... */ + if (nlh == NULL) /* shouldn't really happen ... */ return -EMSGSIZE; f = nlmsg_data(nlh); @@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ static int build_sadinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net *net, u32 *f; nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, pid, seq, XFRM_MSG_NEWSADINFO, sizeof(u32), 0); - if (nlh == NULL) /* shouldnt really happen ... */ + if (nlh == NULL) /* shouldn't really happen ... */ return -EMSGSIZE; f = nlmsg_data(nlh); @@ -1361,7 +1361,7 @@ static int xfrm_add_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, if (!xp) return err; - /* shouldnt excl be based on nlh flags?? + /* shouldn't excl be based on nlh flags?? * Aha! this is anti-netlink really i.e more pfkey derived * in netlink excl is a flag and you wouldnt need * a type XFRM_MSG_UPDPOLICY - JHS */ -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b