From 3d6e5f6dcf6561e57b6466e43e14029fb196028d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 17:18:23 -0700
Subject: LSM: Convert security_initcall() into DEFINE_LSM()

Instead of using argument-based initializers, switch to defining the
contents of struct lsm_info on a per-LSM basis. This also drops
the final use of the now inaccurate "initcall" naming.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morris <james.morris@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.morris@microsoft.com>
---
 security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c')

diff --git a/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c b/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c
index 9f932e2d6852..b2d833999910 100644
--- a/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c
+++ b/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c
@@ -550,4 +550,6 @@ static int __init tomoyo_init(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-security_initcall(tomoyo_init);
+DEFINE_LSM(tomoyo) = {
+	.init = tomoyo_init,
+};
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b