From 0af901643fe3f1f8d44e41115d36609ee4bda2bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Geyslan G. Bem" Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:10:24 -0500 Subject: selinux: fix possible memory leak Free 'ctx_str' when necessary. Signed-off-by: Geyslan G. Bem Signed-off-by: Paul Moore --- security/selinux/xfrm.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'security') diff --git a/security/selinux/xfrm.c b/security/selinux/xfrm.c index a91d205ec0c6..cf79a4564e38 100644 --- a/security/selinux/xfrm.c +++ b/security/selinux/xfrm.c @@ -327,19 +327,22 @@ int selinux_xfrm_state_alloc_acquire(struct xfrm_state *x, return rc; ctx = kmalloc(sizeof(*ctx) + str_len, GFP_ATOMIC); - if (!ctx) - return -ENOMEM; + if (!ctx) { + rc = -ENOMEM; + goto out; + } ctx->ctx_doi = XFRM_SC_DOI_LSM; ctx->ctx_alg = XFRM_SC_ALG_SELINUX; ctx->ctx_sid = secid; ctx->ctx_len = str_len; memcpy(ctx->ctx_str, ctx_str, str_len); - kfree(ctx_str); x->security = ctx; atomic_inc(&selinux_xfrm_refcount); - return 0; +out: + kfree(ctx_str); + return rc; } /* -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From 47180068276a04ed31d24fe04c673138208b07a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Moore Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:10:45 -0500 Subject: selinux: handle TCP SYN-ACK packets correctly in selinux_ip_output() In selinux_ip_output() we always label packets based on the parent socket. While this approach works in almost all cases, it doesn't work in the case of TCP SYN-ACK packets when the correct label is not the label of the parent socket, but rather the label of the larval socket represented by the request_sock struct. Unfortunately, since the request_sock isn't queued on the parent socket until *after* the SYN-ACK packet is sent, we can't lookup the request_sock to determine the correct label for the packet; at this point in time the best we can do is simply pass/NF_ACCEPT the packet. It must be said that simply passing the packet without any explicit labeling action, while far from ideal, is not terrible as the SYN-ACK packet will inherit any IP option based labeling from the initial connection request so the label *should* be correct and all our access controls remain in place so we shouldn't have to worry about information leaks. Reported-by: Janak Desai Tested-by: Janak Desai Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Moore --- security/selinux/hooks.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'security') diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c index 777ee98273d1..877bab748c87 100644 --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ #include /* for local_port_range[] */ #include #include /* struct or_callable used in sock_rcv_skb */ +#include #include #include #include @@ -4731,6 +4732,7 @@ static unsigned int selinux_ipv6_forward(unsigned int hooknum, static unsigned int selinux_ip_output(struct sk_buff *skb, u16 family) { + struct sock *sk; u32 sid; if (!netlbl_enabled()) @@ -4739,8 +4741,27 @@ static unsigned int selinux_ip_output(struct sk_buff *skb, /* we do this in the LOCAL_OUT path and not the POST_ROUTING path * because we want to make sure we apply the necessary labeling * before IPsec is applied so we can leverage AH protection */ - if (skb->sk) { - struct sk_security_struct *sksec = skb->sk->sk_security; + sk = skb->sk; + if (sk) { + struct sk_security_struct *sksec; + + if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) + /* if the socket is the listening state then this + * packet is a SYN-ACK packet which means it needs to + * be labeled based on the connection/request_sock and + * not the parent socket. unfortunately, we can't + * lookup the request_sock yet as it isn't queued on + * the parent socket until after the SYN-ACK is sent. + * the "solution" is to simply pass the packet as-is + * as any IP option based labeling should be copied + * from the initial connection request (in the IP + * layer). it is far from ideal, but until we get a + * security label in the packet itself this is the + * best we can do. */ + return NF_ACCEPT; + + /* standard practice, label using the parent socket */ + sksec = sk->sk_security; sid = sksec->sid; } else sid = SECINITSID_KERNEL; -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From 446b802437f285de68ffb8d6fac3c44c3cab5b04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Moore Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:10:51 -0500 Subject: selinux: handle TCP SYN-ACK packets correctly in selinux_ip_postroute() In selinux_ip_postroute() we perform access checks based on the packet's security label. For locally generated traffic we get the packet's security label from the associated socket; this works in all cases except for TCP SYN-ACK packets. In the case of SYN-ACK packet's the correct security label is stored in the connection's request_sock, not the server's socket. Unfortunately, at the point in time when selinux_ip_postroute() is called we can't query the request_sock directly, we need to recreate the label using the same logic that originally labeled the associated request_sock. See the inline comments for more explanation. Reported-by: Janak Desai Tested-by: Janak Desai Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Moore --- security/selinux/hooks.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) (limited to 'security') diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c index 877bab748c87..cc076a9b0344 100644 --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c @@ -3847,6 +3847,30 @@ static int selinux_skb_peerlbl_sid(struct sk_buff *skb, u16 family, u32 *sid) return 0; } +/** + * selinux_conn_sid - Determine the child socket label for a connection + * @sk_sid: the parent socket's SID + * @skb_sid: the packet's SID + * @conn_sid: the resulting connection SID + * + * If @skb_sid is valid then the user:role:type information from @sk_sid is + * combined with the MLS information from @skb_sid in order to create + * @conn_sid. If @skb_sid is not valid then then @conn_sid is simply a copy + * of @sk_sid. Returns zero on success, negative values on failure. + * + */ +static int selinux_conn_sid(u32 sk_sid, u32 skb_sid, u32 *conn_sid) +{ + int err = 0; + + if (skb_sid != SECSID_NULL) + err = security_sid_mls_copy(sk_sid, skb_sid, conn_sid); + else + *conn_sid = sk_sid; + + return err; +} + /* socket security operations */ static int socket_sockcreate_sid(const struct task_security_struct *tsec, @@ -4453,7 +4477,7 @@ static int selinux_inet_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, struct sk_security_struct *sksec = sk->sk_security; int err; u16 family = sk->sk_family; - u32 newsid; + u32 connsid; u32 peersid; /* handle mapped IPv4 packets arriving via IPv6 sockets */ @@ -4463,16 +4487,11 @@ static int selinux_inet_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, err = selinux_skb_peerlbl_sid(skb, family, &peersid); if (err) return err; - if (peersid == SECSID_NULL) { - req->secid = sksec->sid; - req->peer_secid = SECSID_NULL; - } else { - err = security_sid_mls_copy(sksec->sid, peersid, &newsid); - if (err) - return err; - req->secid = newsid; - req->peer_secid = peersid; - } + err = selinux_conn_sid(sksec->sid, peersid, &connsid); + if (err) + return err; + req->secid = connsid; + req->peer_secid = peersid; return selinux_netlbl_inet_conn_request(req, family); } @@ -4846,12 +4865,12 @@ static unsigned int selinux_ip_postroute(struct sk_buff *skb, int ifindex, if (!secmark_active && !peerlbl_active) return NF_ACCEPT; - /* if the packet is being forwarded then get the peer label from the - * packet itself; otherwise check to see if it is from a local - * application or the kernel, if from an application get the peer label - * from the sending socket, otherwise use the kernel's sid */ sk = skb->sk; if (sk == NULL) { + /* Without an associated socket the packet is either coming + * from the kernel or it is being forwarded; check the packet + * to determine which and if the packet is being forwarded + * query the packet directly to determine the security label. */ if (skb->skb_iif) { secmark_perm = PACKET__FORWARD_OUT; if (selinux_skb_peerlbl_sid(skb, family, &peer_sid)) @@ -4860,7 +4879,26 @@ static unsigned int selinux_ip_postroute(struct sk_buff *skb, int ifindex, secmark_perm = PACKET__SEND; peer_sid = SECINITSID_KERNEL; } + } else if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) { + /* Locally generated packet but the associated socket is in the + * listening state which means this is a SYN-ACK packet. In + * this particular case the correct security label is assigned + * to the connection/request_sock but unfortunately we can't + * query the request_sock as it isn't queued on the parent + * socket until after the SYN-ACK packet is sent; the only + * viable choice is to regenerate the label like we do in + * selinux_inet_conn_request(). See also selinux_ip_output() + * for similar problems. */ + u32 skb_sid; + struct sk_security_struct *sksec = sk->sk_security; + if (selinux_skb_peerlbl_sid(skb, family, &skb_sid)) + return NF_DROP; + if (selinux_conn_sid(sksec->sid, skb_sid, &peer_sid)) + return NF_DROP; + secmark_perm = PACKET__SEND; } else { + /* Locally generated packet, fetch the security label from the + * associated socket. */ struct sk_security_struct *sksec = sk->sk_security; peer_sid = sksec->sid; secmark_perm = PACKET__SEND; -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From 817eff718dca4e54d5721211ddde0914428fbb7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Moore Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 14:57:54 -0500 Subject: selinux: look for IPsec labels on both inbound and outbound packets Previously selinux_skb_peerlbl_sid() would only check for labeled IPsec security labels on inbound packets, this patch enables it to check both inbound and outbound traffic for labeled IPsec security labels. Reported-by: Janak Desai Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Moore --- security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 +- security/selinux/include/xfrm.h | 8 ++++--- security/selinux/xfrm.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) (limited to 'security') diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c index cc076a9b0344..8b2812312ae4 100644 --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c @@ -3829,7 +3829,7 @@ static int selinux_skb_peerlbl_sid(struct sk_buff *skb, u16 family, u32 *sid) u32 nlbl_sid; u32 nlbl_type; - err = selinux_skb_xfrm_sid(skb, &xfrm_sid); + err = selinux_xfrm_skb_sid(skb, &xfrm_sid); if (unlikely(err)) return -EACCES; err = selinux_netlbl_skbuff_getsid(skb, family, &nlbl_type, &nlbl_sid); diff --git a/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h b/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h index 0dec76c64cf5..48c3cc94c168 100644 --- a/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h +++ b/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb, int selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb, struct common_audit_data *ad, u8 proto); int selinux_xfrm_decode_session(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *sid, int ckall); +int selinux_xfrm_skb_sid(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *sid); static inline void selinux_xfrm_notify_policyload(void) { @@ -79,11 +80,12 @@ static inline int selinux_xfrm_decode_session(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *sid, static inline void selinux_xfrm_notify_policyload(void) { } -#endif -static inline int selinux_skb_xfrm_sid(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *sid) +static inline int selinux_xfrm_skb_sid(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *sid) { - return selinux_xfrm_decode_session(skb, sid, 0); + *sid = SECSID_NULL; + return 0; } +#endif #endif /* _SELINUX_XFRM_H_ */ diff --git a/security/selinux/xfrm.c b/security/selinux/xfrm.c index cf79a4564e38..0462cb3ff0a7 100644 --- a/security/selinux/xfrm.c +++ b/security/selinux/xfrm.c @@ -209,19 +209,26 @@ int selinux_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x, NULL) ? 0 : 1); } -/* - * LSM hook implementation that checks and/or returns the xfrm sid for the - * incoming packet. - */ -int selinux_xfrm_decode_session(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *sid, int ckall) +static u32 selinux_xfrm_skb_sid_egress(struct sk_buff *skb) { - u32 sid_session = SECSID_NULL; - struct sec_path *sp; + struct dst_entry *dst = skb_dst(skb); + struct xfrm_state *x; - if (skb == NULL) - goto out; + if (dst == NULL) + return SECSID_NULL; + x = dst->xfrm; + if (x == NULL || !selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x)) + return SECSID_NULL; + + return x->security->ctx_sid; +} + +static int selinux_xfrm_skb_sid_ingress(struct sk_buff *skb, + u32 *sid, int ckall) +{ + u32 sid_session = SECSID_NULL; + struct sec_path *sp = skb->sp; - sp = skb->sp; if (sp) { int i; @@ -247,6 +254,30 @@ out: return 0; } +/* + * LSM hook implementation that checks and/or returns the xfrm sid for the + * incoming packet. + */ +int selinux_xfrm_decode_session(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *sid, int ckall) +{ + if (skb == NULL) { + *sid = SECSID_NULL; + return 0; + } + return selinux_xfrm_skb_sid_ingress(skb, sid, ckall); +} + +int selinux_xfrm_skb_sid(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *sid) +{ + int rc; + + rc = selinux_xfrm_skb_sid_ingress(skb, sid, 0); + if (rc == 0 && *sid == SECSID_NULL) + *sid = selinux_xfrm_skb_sid_egress(skb); + + return rc; +} + /* * LSM hook implementation that allocs and transfers uctx spec to xfrm_policy. */ -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From c0828e50485932b7e019df377a6b0a8d1ebd3080 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Moore Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 14:58:01 -0500 Subject: selinux: process labeled IPsec TCP SYN-ACK packets properly in selinux_ip_postroute() Due to difficulty in arriving at the proper security label for TCP SYN-ACK packets in selinux_ip_postroute(), we need to check packets while/before they are undergoing XFRM transforms instead of waiting until afterwards so that we can determine the correct security label. Reported-by: Janak Desai Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Moore --- security/selinux/hooks.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'security') diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c index 8b2812312ae4..6db2e589a1f3 100644 --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c @@ -4850,22 +4850,31 @@ static unsigned int selinux_ip_postroute(struct sk_buff *skb, int ifindex, * as fast and as clean as possible. */ if (!selinux_policycap_netpeer) return selinux_ip_postroute_compat(skb, ifindex, family); + + secmark_active = selinux_secmark_enabled(); + peerlbl_active = selinux_peerlbl_enabled(); + if (!secmark_active && !peerlbl_active) + return NF_ACCEPT; + + sk = skb->sk; + #ifdef CONFIG_XFRM /* If skb->dst->xfrm is non-NULL then the packet is undergoing an IPsec * packet transformation so allow the packet to pass without any checks * since we'll have another chance to perform access control checks * when the packet is on it's final way out. * NOTE: there appear to be some IPv6 multicast cases where skb->dst - * is NULL, in this case go ahead and apply access control. */ - if (skb_dst(skb) != NULL && skb_dst(skb)->xfrm != NULL) + * is NULL, in this case go ahead and apply access control. + * NOTE: if this is a local socket (skb->sk != NULL) that is in the + * TCP listening state we cannot wait until the XFRM processing + * is done as we will miss out on the SA label if we do; + * unfortunately, this means more work, but it is only once per + * connection. */ + if (skb_dst(skb) != NULL && skb_dst(skb)->xfrm != NULL && + !(sk != NULL && sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN)) return NF_ACCEPT; #endif - secmark_active = selinux_secmark_enabled(); - peerlbl_active = selinux_peerlbl_enabled(); - if (!secmark_active && !peerlbl_active) - return NF_ACCEPT; - sk = skb->sk; if (sk == NULL) { /* Without an associated socket the packet is either coming * from the kernel or it is being forwarded; check the packet @@ -4893,6 +4902,25 @@ static unsigned int selinux_ip_postroute(struct sk_buff *skb, int ifindex, struct sk_security_struct *sksec = sk->sk_security; if (selinux_skb_peerlbl_sid(skb, family, &skb_sid)) return NF_DROP; + /* At this point, if the returned skb peerlbl is SECSID_NULL + * and the packet has been through at least one XFRM + * transformation then we must be dealing with the "final" + * form of labeled IPsec packet; since we've already applied + * all of our access controls on this packet we can safely + * pass the packet. */ + if (skb_sid == SECSID_NULL) { + switch (family) { + case PF_INET: + if (IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED) + return NF_ACCEPT; + break; + case PF_INET6: + if (IP6CB(skb)->flags & IP6SKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED) + return NF_ACCEPT; + default: + return NF_DROP_ERR(-ECONNREFUSED); + } + } if (selinux_conn_sid(sksec->sid, skb_sid, &peer_sid)) return NF_DROP; secmark_perm = PACKET__SEND; -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b