From 3fbfadce6012e7bb384b2e9ad47869d5177f7209 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin KaFai Lau Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:17:29 -0800 Subject: bpf: Fix test_lru_sanity5() in test_lru_map.c test_lru_sanity5() fails when the number of online cpus is fewer than the number of possible cpus. It can be reproduced with qemu by using cmd args "--smp cpus=2,maxcpus=8". The problem is the loop in test_lru_sanity5() is testing 'i' which is incorrect. This patch: 1. Make sched_next_online() always return -1 if it cannot find a next cpu to schedule the process. 2. In test_lru_sanity5(), the parent process does sched_setaffinity() first (through sched_next_online()) and the forked process will inherit it according to the 'man sched_setaffinity'. Fixes: 5db58faf989f ("bpf: Add tests for the LRU bpf_htab") Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c | 53 +++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c index b13fed534d76..9f7bd1915c21 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c @@ -67,21 +67,23 @@ static int map_equal(int lru_map, int expected) return map_subset(lru_map, expected) && map_subset(expected, lru_map); } -static int sched_next_online(int pid, int next_to_try) +static int sched_next_online(int pid, int *next_to_try) { cpu_set_t cpuset; + int next = *next_to_try; + int ret = -1; - if (next_to_try == nr_cpus) - return -1; - - while (next_to_try < nr_cpus) { + while (next < nr_cpus) { CPU_ZERO(&cpuset); - CPU_SET(next_to_try++, &cpuset); - if (!sched_setaffinity(pid, sizeof(cpuset), &cpuset)) + CPU_SET(next++, &cpuset); + if (!sched_setaffinity(pid, sizeof(cpuset), &cpuset)) { + ret = 0; break; + } } - return next_to_try; + *next_to_try = next; + return ret; } /* Size of the LRU amp is 2 @@ -96,11 +98,12 @@ static void test_lru_sanity0(int map_type, int map_flags) { unsigned long long key, value[nr_cpus]; int lru_map_fd, expected_map_fd; + int next_cpu = 0; printf("%s (map_type:%d map_flags:0x%X): ", __func__, map_type, map_flags); - assert(sched_next_online(0, 0) != -1); + assert(sched_next_online(0, &next_cpu) != -1); if (map_flags & BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU) lru_map_fd = create_map(map_type, map_flags, 2 * nr_cpus); @@ -183,6 +186,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity1(int map_type, int map_flags, unsigned int tgt_free) int lru_map_fd, expected_map_fd; unsigned int batch_size; unsigned int map_size; + int next_cpu = 0; if (map_flags & BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU) /* Ther percpu lru list (i.e each cpu has its own LRU @@ -196,7 +200,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity1(int map_type, int map_flags, unsigned int tgt_free) printf("%s (map_type:%d map_flags:0x%X): ", __func__, map_type, map_flags); - assert(sched_next_online(0, 0) != -1); + assert(sched_next_online(0, &next_cpu) != -1); batch_size = tgt_free / 2; assert(batch_size * 2 == tgt_free); @@ -262,6 +266,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity2(int map_type, int map_flags, unsigned int tgt_free) int lru_map_fd, expected_map_fd; unsigned int batch_size; unsigned int map_size; + int next_cpu = 0; if (map_flags & BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU) /* Ther percpu lru list (i.e each cpu has its own LRU @@ -275,7 +280,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity2(int map_type, int map_flags, unsigned int tgt_free) printf("%s (map_type:%d map_flags:0x%X): ", __func__, map_type, map_flags); - assert(sched_next_online(0, 0) != -1); + assert(sched_next_online(0, &next_cpu) != -1); batch_size = tgt_free / 2; assert(batch_size * 2 == tgt_free); @@ -370,11 +375,12 @@ static void test_lru_sanity3(int map_type, int map_flags, unsigned int tgt_free) int lru_map_fd, expected_map_fd; unsigned int batch_size; unsigned int map_size; + int next_cpu = 0; printf("%s (map_type:%d map_flags:0x%X): ", __func__, map_type, map_flags); - assert(sched_next_online(0, 0) != -1); + assert(sched_next_online(0, &next_cpu) != -1); batch_size = tgt_free / 2; assert(batch_size * 2 == tgt_free); @@ -430,11 +436,12 @@ static void test_lru_sanity4(int map_type, int map_flags, unsigned int tgt_free) int lru_map_fd, expected_map_fd; unsigned long long key, value[nr_cpus]; unsigned long long end_key; + int next_cpu = 0; printf("%s (map_type:%d map_flags:0x%X): ", __func__, map_type, map_flags); - assert(sched_next_online(0, 0) != -1); + assert(sched_next_online(0, &next_cpu) != -1); if (map_flags & BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU) lru_map_fd = create_map(map_type, map_flags, @@ -502,9 +509,8 @@ static void do_test_lru_sanity5(unsigned long long last_key, int map_fd) static void test_lru_sanity5(int map_type, int map_flags) { unsigned long long key, value[nr_cpus]; - int next_sched_cpu = 0; + int next_cpu = 0; int map_fd; - int i; if (map_flags & BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU) return; @@ -519,27 +525,20 @@ static void test_lru_sanity5(int map_type, int map_flags) key = 0; assert(!bpf_map_update(map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST)); - for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) { + while (sched_next_online(0, &next_cpu) != -1) { pid_t pid; pid = fork(); if (pid == 0) { - next_sched_cpu = sched_next_online(0, next_sched_cpu); - if (next_sched_cpu != -1) - do_test_lru_sanity5(key, map_fd); + do_test_lru_sanity5(key, map_fd); exit(0); } else if (pid == -1) { - printf("couldn't spawn #%d process\n", i); + printf("couldn't spawn process to test key:%llu\n", + key); exit(1); } else { int status; - /* It is mostly redundant and just allow the parent - * process to update next_shced_cpu for the next child - * process - */ - next_sched_cpu = sched_next_online(pid, next_sched_cpu); - assert(waitpid(pid, &status, 0) == pid); assert(status == 0); key++; @@ -547,6 +546,8 @@ static void test_lru_sanity5(int map_type, int map_flags) } close(map_fd); + /* At least one key should be tested */ + assert(key > 0); printf("Pass\n"); } -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From df21d2fa733035e4d414379960f94b2516b41296 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Madhavan Srinivasan Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 17:46:53 +0530 Subject: selftest/powerpc: Wrong PMC initialized in pmc56_overflow test Test uses PMC2 to count the event. But PMC1 is being initialized. Patch to fix it. Fixes: 3752e453f6ba ('selftests/powerpc: Add tests of PMU EBBs') Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman --- tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/ebb/pmc56_overflow_test.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tools/testing') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/ebb/pmc56_overflow_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/ebb/pmc56_overflow_test.c index c22860ab9733..30e1ac62e8cb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/ebb/pmc56_overflow_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/ebb/pmc56_overflow_test.c @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ int pmc56_overflow(void) FAIL_IF(ebb_event_enable(&event)); - mtspr(SPRN_PMC1, pmc_sample_period(sample_period)); + mtspr(SPRN_PMC2, pmc_sample_period(sample_period)); mtspr(SPRN_PMC5, 0); mtspr(SPRN_PMC6, 0); -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b