From 8af1c8b8d6223c31fada6148fd870257407952d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 20:39:01 -0700 Subject: selftests/bpf: Make reference_tracking test use subtests reference_tracking is actually a set of 9 sub-tests. Make it explicitly so. Also, add explicit "classifier/" prefix to BPF program section names to let libbpf correctly guess program type. Thus, also remove explicit bpf_prog__set_type() call. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191021033902.3856966-7-andriin@fb.com --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c | 3 ++- .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c index 86cee820d4d3..4493ba277bd7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c @@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ void test_reference_tracking(void) if (strstr(title, ".text") != NULL) continue; - bpf_program__set_type(prog, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS); + if (!test__start_subtest(title)) + continue; /* Expect verifier failure if test name has 'fail' */ if (strstr(title, "fail") != NULL) { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c index e21cd736c196..cb49ccb707d1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static struct bpf_sock_tuple *get_tuple(void *data, __u64 nh_off, return result; } -SEC("sk_lookup_success") +SEC("classifier/sk_lookup_success") int bpf_sk_lookup_test0(struct __sk_buff *skb) { void *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end; @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_test0(struct __sk_buff *skb) return sk ? TC_ACT_OK : TC_ACT_UNSPEC; } -SEC("sk_lookup_success_simple") +SEC("classifier/sk_lookup_success_simple") int bpf_sk_lookup_test1(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_test1(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("fail_use_after_free") +SEC("classifier/fail_use_after_free") int bpf_sk_lookup_uaf(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_uaf(struct __sk_buff *skb) return family; } -SEC("fail_modify_sk_pointer") +SEC("classifier/fail_modify_sk_pointer") int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("fail_modify_sk_or_null_pointer") +SEC("classifier/fail_modify_sk_or_null_pointer") int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr_or_null(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr_or_null(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("fail_no_release") +SEC("classifier/fail_no_release") int bpf_sk_lookup_test2(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_test2(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("fail_release_twice") +SEC("classifier/fail_release_twice") int bpf_sk_lookup_test3(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_test3(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("fail_release_unchecked") +SEC("classifier/fail_release_unchecked") int bpf_sk_lookup_test4(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ void lookup_no_release(struct __sk_buff *skb) bpf_sk_lookup_tcp(skb, &tuple, sizeof(tuple), BPF_F_CURRENT_NETNS, 0); } -SEC("fail_no_release_subcall") +SEC("classifier/fail_no_release_subcall") int bpf_sk_lookup_test5(struct __sk_buff *skb) { lookup_no_release(skb); -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b