| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The function bcm47xxnflash_ops_bcm4706_cmd_ctrl() calls the function
bcm47xxnflash_ops_bcm4706_ctl_cmd(), but does not check its return value.
A proper implementation can be found in bcm47xxnflash_ops_bcm4706_write().
Add error log to the bcm47xxnflash_ops_bcm4706_ctl_cmd() via pr_err()
to prevent silent failure. The error Log funciton 'dev_err' is unsuitable
in this situation for it is hard to get device pointer.
Signed-off-by: Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
denali_pci.c enables a PCI device with pcim_enable_device(). This,
implicitly, switches the function pci_request_regions() into managed
mode, where it becomes a devres function.
The PCI subsystem wants to remove this hybrid nature from its
interfaces. To do so, users of the aforementioned combination of
functions must be ported to non-hybrid functions.
Moreover, since both functions are already managed in this driver, the
calls to pci_release_regions() are unnecessary.
Remove the calls to pci_release_regions().
Replace the call to sometimes-managed pci_request_regions() with one to
the always-managed pcim_request_regions().
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
If ctx->steps is zero, the loop processing ECC steps is skipped,
and the variable ret remains uninitialized. It is later checked
and returned, which leads to undefined behavior and may cause
unpredictable results in user space or kernel crashes.
This scenario can be triggered in edge cases such as misconfigured
geometry, ECC engine misuse, or if ctx->steps is not validated
after initialization.
Initialize ret to zero before the loop to ensure correct and safe
behavior regardless of the ctx->steps value.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: 48e6633a9fa2 ("mtd: nand: mxic-ecc: Add Macronix external ECC engine support")
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Arkhipov <m.arhipov@rosa.ru>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
These chips support single SPI, octal SPI and octal DDR SPI.
For now, only the SDR protocols are supported.
Tested with the W35N02JW variant, but the 04 one just has twice more
dies and is described in the same datasheet, so we can reasonably expect
that it will behave identically.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
Describe the octal "read from cache" (1S_1S_8S, 1S_8S_8S and
1S_1D_8D_OP) and "program load" (1S_1S_8S and 1S_8S_8S) operations
supported by the W35N01JW chip.
There is no observable improvement between the two octal SDR modes,
which anyway offered a great read speed improvement compared to single
mode.
flash_speed test results ran on the TI AM62A7 LP SK using a 25MHz SPI bus:
* Single mode:
eraseblock read speed is 2346 KiB/s
page read speed is 2342 KiB/s
eraseblock write speed is 2028 KiB/s
page write speed is 2028 KiB/s
* Octal modes:
eraseblock read speed is 10801 KiB/s
page read speed is 10711 KiB/s
eraseblock write speed is 7335 KiB/s
page write speed is 7293 KiB/s
However, testing on the cadence qspi controller driver did not allow
mixed modes (where SDR and DTR cycles are mixed in the same operation),
thus 1S-1D-8D mode could not be tested and is provided for reference (it
is anyway skipped on platforms not supporting this). It did not allow
easy "update cache" tests either, so these macros are untested and given
as-is.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
Add support for the W35N series by describing the smaller (single die)
chip. It has 1b/512B ECC support and its own OOB layout.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
So far all the chips supported in the driver apparently have support for
the same kind of operation (typically, single, dual and quad). The
future introduction of W35N chips will change that as these chips only
support single and octal modes. Let's rename the variants accordingly to
make these future additions more understandable.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI NAND chips may support octal "read from cache" and "program load"
transfers. List the opcodes by defining the relevant macros describing
these operations.
However, due to the hardware available I had, 0x82 and 0xc2 are
untested and given as reference, only 0xc4 could be (successfully)
tested.
Controllers supporting operations mixing SDR and DTR operations might
even leverage octal DTR data I/O transfers.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really means by describing the expected bus
topology in the (quad) program load macro name.
While at modifying it, better add the missing_ OP suffix to align with
all the other macros of the same kind.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really means by describing the expected bus
topology in the (single) program load macro name.
While at modifying it, better add the missing_ OP suffix to align with
all the other macros of the same kind.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really means by describing the expected bus
topology in the program execution macro name.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
[Miquel: Fixed conflicts with -next by updating esmt and micron drivers]
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really mean by describing the expected bus
topology in the (quad IO) read from cache macro names.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really mean by describing the expected bus
topology in the (quad output) read from cache macro names.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really mean by describing the expected bus
topology in the (dual IO) read from cache macro names. While at
modifying them, better reordering the macros to group them all by bus
topology which now feels more intuitive.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really mean by describing the expected bus
topology in the (dual output) read from cache macro names.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really mean by describing the expected bus
topology in the (single) read from cache macro names.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really means by describing the expected bus
topology in the page read macro name.
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really means by describing the expected bus
topology in the erase macro name.
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really mean by describing the expected bus
topology in the get/set feature macro names.
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
[Miquel: Fixed conflicts with -next by updating macronix driver]
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really means by describing the expected bus
topology in the read ID macro name.
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really means by describing the expected bus
topology in the write enable/disable macro names.
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
[Miquel: Fixed conflicts with -next by updating esmt and micron drivers]
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
vendor naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really means by describing the expected bus
topology in the reset macro name.
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
Add NAND controller driver for Loongson-1 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Keguang Zhang <keguang.zhang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
Wentao Liang
Philipp Stanner
Mikhail Arkhipov
Miquel Raynal
Keguang Zhang