| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
In bpf_seq_printf() helper, when user specified a "%s" in the
format string, strncpy_from_unsafe() is used to read the actual string
to a buffer. The string could be a format string or a string in
the kernel data structure. It is really unlikely that the string
will reside in the user memory.
This is different from Commit b2a5212fb634 ("bpf: Restrict bpf_trace_printk()'s %s
usage and add %pks, %pus specifier") which still used
strncpy_from_unsafe() for "%s" to preserve the old behavior.
If in the future, bpf_seq_printf() indeed needs to read user
memory, we can implement "%pus" format string.
Based on discussion in [1], if the intent is to read kernel memory,
strncpy_from_unsafe_strict() should be used. So this patch
changed to use strncpy_from_unsafe_strict().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200521152301.2587579-1-hch@lst.de/T/
Fixes: 492e639f0c22 ("bpf: Add bpf_seq_printf and bpf_seq_write helpers")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200529004810.3352219-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add "rx_queue_mapping" to bpf_sock. This gives read access for the
existing field (sk_rx_queue_mapping) of struct sock from bpf_sock.
Semantics for the bpf_sock rx_queue_mapping access are similar to
sk_rx_queue_get(), i.e the value NO_QUEUE_MAPPING is not allowed
and -1 is returned in that case. This is useful for transmit queue
selection based on the received queue index which is cached in the
socket in the receive path.
v3: Addressed review comments to add usecase in patch description,
and fixed default value for rx_queue_mapping.
v2: fixed build error for CONFIG_XPS wrapping, reported by
kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Amritha Nambiar <amritha.nambiar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
For write-only stacks and queues bpf_map_update_elem should be allowed, but
bpf_map_lookup_elem and bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_elem should fail with EPERM.
Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200527185700.14658-6-a.s.protopopov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|