Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_cbs.destroy_connector callbacks are identical
amongst every driver and don't do anything other than cleaning up the
connector (drm_connector_unregister()/drm_connector_put()) except for
amdgpu_dm driver where some amdgpu_dm specific code in there which I
an not sure if it should stay or not.
Create and use a helper which calls driver's destroy_connector hook if
available otherwise does cleanup internally.
This is the step towards removing identical hooks from every driver.
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>
Suggested-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200307083023.76498-5-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
|
|
Now drm_dp_mst_topology_cbs.register_connector callback is not getting
used anymore hence remove it.
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>
Suggested-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200307083023.76498-4-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
|
|
drm_dp_mst_port_add_connector() directly calls the
drm_connector_register() now and
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_cbs.register_connector callback is not getting
called anymore.
Hence remove all drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_cbs.register_connector
callbacks.
This is the preparatory step for removing the
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_cbs.register_connector callback hook.
The removal is done with below sementic patch:
@r1@
identifier func, E;
@@
struct drm_dp_mst_topology_cbs E = {
...,
- .register_connector = func
};
@delete depends on r1@
identifier r1.func;
@@
- static void func(...){...}
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>
Suggested-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200307083023.76498-3-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
|
|
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_cbs.register_connector callbacks are literally
identical amongst every driver and don't do anything other than
calling drm_connector_register(). Hence call drm_connector_register()
directly instead of a callback.
This is the preparatory step for removing the
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_cbs.register_connector callback hook.
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>
Suggested-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200307083023.76498-2-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
|
|
Adaptive Sync is a VESA feature so add a DRM core helper to parse
the EDID's detailed descritors to obtain the adaptive sync monitor range.
Store this info as part fo drm_display_info so it can be used
across all drivers.
This part of the code is stripped out of amdgpu's function
amdgpu_dm_update_freesync_caps() to make it generic and be used
across all DRM drivers
v6:
* Call it monitor_range (Ville)
v5:
* Use the renamed flags
v4:
* Use is_display_descriptor() (Ville)
* Name the monitor range flags (Ville)
v3:
* Remove the edid parsing restriction for just DP (Nicholas)
* Use drm_for_each_detailed_block (Ville)
* Make the drm_get_adaptive_sync_range function static (Harry, Jani)
v2:
* Change vmin and vmax to use u8 (Ville)
* Dont store pixel clock since that is just a max dotclock
and not related to VRR mode (Manasi)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Cc: Clinton A Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
Cc: Kazlauskas Nicholas <Nicholas.Kazlauskas@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200310231651.13841-2-manasi.d.navare@intel.com
|
|
This patch adds defines for the detailed monitor
range flags as per the EDID specification.
v2:
* Rename the flags with DRM_EDID_ (Jani N)
Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Cc: Clinton A Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
Cc: Kazlauskas Nicholas <Nicholas.Kazlauskas@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200310231651.13841-1-manasi.d.navare@intel.com
|
|
The currently listed dotclock disagrees with the currently
listed vrefresh rate. Change the dotclock to match the vrefresh.
Someone tell me which (if either) of the dotclock or vreresh is
correct?
Cc: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200302203452.17977-22-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
|
|
The currently listed dotclocks disagree with the currently
listed vrefresh rates. Change the dotclocks to match the vrefresh.
Someone tell me which (if either) of the dotclock or vreresh is
correct?
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200302203452.17977-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
The currently listed dotclock disagrees with the currently
listed vrefresh rate. Change the dotclock to match the vrefresh.
Someone tell me which (if either) of the dotclock or vreresh is
correct?
Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200302203452.17977-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
|
|
The listed dotclocks are two orders of mangnitude out.
Fix them.
v2: Just divide everything by 100 (Linus)
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200309133809.32585-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
The dotclock is three orders of magnitude out. Fix it.
v2: Just set it to 20MHz (Linus)
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200309133644.32385-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size instead of the
actual output size, the succeeding calls may go beyond the given
buffer limit. Fix it by replacing with scnprintf().
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200311073540.7108-1-tiwai@suse.de
|
|
Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size instead of the
actual output size, the succeeding calls may go beyond the given
buffer limit. Fix it by replacing with scnprintf().
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/357174/
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
|
|
The assert sometimes incorrectly triggers when pinned BOs are destroyed.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Tested-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/356737/
|
|
rockchip_drm_endpoint_is_subdriver() may also return error codes.
For example if the target-node is in the disabled state, so no
platform-device is getting created for it.
In that case current code would count that as external rgb device,
which in turn would make probing the rockchip-drm device fail.
So only count the target as rgb device if the function actually
returns 0.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200121224828.4070067-1-heiko@sntech.de
|