wireguard-linux/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h, branch jd/unified-crypt-queue

x86/pkeys: Add check for pkey "overflow"

2020-02-24T19:25:21Z

Alex Shi reported the pkey macros above arch_set_user_pkey_access() to be unused. They are unused, and even refer to a nonexistent CONFIG option. But, they might have served a good use, which was to ensure that the code does not try to set values that would not fit in the PKRU register. As it stands, a too-large 'pkey' value would be likely to silently overflow the u32 new_pkru_bits. Add a check to look for overflows. Also add a comment to remind any future developer to closely examine the types used to store pkey values if arch_max_pkey() ever changes. This boots and passes the x86 pkey selftests. Reported-by: Alex Shi Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200122165346.AD4DA150@viggo.jf.intel.com

Merge tag 'powerpc-4.18-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux

2018-06-07T17:23:33Z

Pull powerpc updates from Michael Ellerman: "Notable changes: - Support for split PMD page table lock on 64-bit Book3S (Power8/9). - Add support for HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE, so we properly support live patching again. - Add support for patching barrier_nospec in copy_from_user() and syscall entry. - A couple of fixes for our data breakpoints on Book3S. - A series from Nick optimising TLB/mm handling with the Radix MMU. - Numerous small cleanups to squash sparse/gcc warnings from Mathieu Malaterre. - Several series optimising various parts of the 32-bit code from Christophe Leroy. - Removal of support for two old machines, "SBC834xE" and "C2K" ("GEFanuc,C2K"), which is why the diffstat has so many deletions. And many other small improvements & fixes. There's a few out-of-area changes. Some minor ftrace changes OK'ed by Steve, and a fix to our powernv cpuidle driver. Then there's a series touching mm, x86 and fs/proc/task_mmu.c, which cleans up some details around pkey support. It was ack'ed/reviewed by Ingo & Dave and has been in next for several weeks. Thanks to: Akshay Adiga, Alastair D'Silva, Alexey Kardashevskiy, Al Viro, Andrew Donnellan, Aneesh Kumar K.V, Anju T Sudhakar, Arnd Bergmann, Balbir Singh, Cédric Le Goater, Christophe Leroy, Christophe Lombard, Colin Ian King, Dave Hansen, Fabio Estevam, Finn Thain, Frederic Barrat, Gautham R. Shenoy, Haren Myneni, Hari Bathini, Ingo Molnar, Jonathan Neuschäfer, Josh Poimboeuf, Kamalesh Babulal, Madhavan Srinivasan, Mahesh Salgaonkar, Mark Greer, Mathieu Malaterre, Matthew Wilcox, Michael Neuling, Michal Suchanek, Naveen N. Rao, Nicholas Piggin, Nicolai Stange, Olof Johansson, Paul Gortmaker, Paul Mackerras, Peter Rosin, Pridhiviraj Paidipeddi, Ram Pai, Rashmica Gupta, Ravi Bangoria, Russell Currey, Sam Bobroff, Samuel Mendoza-Jonas, Segher Boessenkool, Shilpasri G Bhat, Simon Guo, Souptick Joarder, Stewart Smith, Thiago Jung Bauermann, Torsten Duwe, Vaibhav Jain, Wei Yongjun, Wolfram Sang, Yisheng Xie, YueHaibing" * tag 'powerpc-4.18-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux: (251 commits) powerpc/64s/radix: Fix missing ptesync in flush_cache_vmap cpuidle: powernv: Fix promotion from snooze if next state disabled powerpc: fix build failure by disabling attribute-alias warning in pci_32 ocxl: Fix missing unlock on error in afu_ioctl_enable_p9_wait() powerpc-opal: fix spelling mistake "Uniterrupted" -> "Uninterrupted" powerpc: fix spelling mistake: "Usupported" -> "Unsupported" powerpc/pkeys: Detach execute_only key on !PROT_EXEC powerpc/powernv: copy/paste - Mask SO bit in CR powerpc: Remove core support for Marvell mv64x60 hostbridges powerpc/boot: Remove core support for Marvell mv64x60 hostbridges powerpc/boot: Remove support for Marvell mv64x60 i2c controller powerpc/boot: Remove support for Marvell MPSC serial controller powerpc/embedded6xx: Remove C2K board support powerpc/lib: optimise PPC32 memcmp powerpc/lib: optimise 32 bits __clear_user() powerpc/time: inline arch_vtime_task_switch() powerpc/Makefile: set -mcpu=860 flag for the 8xx powerpc: Implement csum_ipv6_magic in assembly powerpc/32: Optimise __csum_partial() powerpc/lib: Adjust .balign inside string functions for PPC32 ...

x86/pkeys: Do not special case protection key 0

2018-05-14T09:14:45Z

mm_pkey_is_allocated() treats pkey 0 as unallocated. That is inconsistent with the manpages, and also inconsistent with mm->context.pkey_allocation_map. Stop special casing it and only disallow values that are actually bad (< 0). The end-user visible effect of this is that you can now use mprotect_pkey() to set pkey=0. This is a bit nicer than what Ram proposed[1] because it is simpler and removes special-casing for pkey 0. On the other hand, it does allow applications to pkey_free() pkey-0, but that's just a silly thing to do, so we are not going to protect against it. The scenario that could happen is similar to what happens if you free any other pkey that is in use: it might get reallocated later and used to protect some other data. The most likely scenario is that pkey-0 comes back from pkey_alloc(), an access-disable or write-disable bit is set in PKRU for it, and the next stack access will SIGSEGV. It's not horribly different from if you mprotect()'d your stack or heap to be unreadable or unwritable, which is generally very foolish, but also not explicitly prevented by the kernel. 1. http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1522112702-27853-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Cc: Andrew Morton p Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Michael Ellermen Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ram Pai Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 58ab9a088dda ("x86/pkeys: Check against max pkey to avoid overflows") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171358.47FD785E@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

x86/pkeys: Override pkey when moving away from PROT_EXEC

2018-05-14T09:14:45Z

I got a bug report that the following code (roughly) was causing a SIGSEGV: mprotect(ptr, size, PROT_EXEC); mprotect(ptr, size, PROT_NONE); mprotect(ptr, size, PROT_READ); *ptr = 100; The problem is hit when the mprotect(PROT_EXEC) is implicitly assigned a protection key to the VMA, and made that key ACCESS_DENY|WRITE_DENY. The PROT_NONE mprotect() failed to remove the protection key, and the PROT_NONE-> PROT_READ left the PTE usable, but the pkey still in place and left the memory inaccessible. To fix this, we ensure that we always "override" the pkee at mprotect() if the VMA does not have execute-only permissions, but the VMA has the execute-only pkey. We had a check for PROT_READ/WRITE, but it did not work for PROT_NONE. This entirely removes the PROT_* checks, which ensures that PROT_NONE now works. Reported-by: Shakeel Butt Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Michael Ellermen Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ram Pai Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 62b5f7d013f ("mm/core, x86/mm/pkeys: Add execute-only protection keys support") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171351.084C5A71@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

x86/pkeys: Add arch_pkeys_enabled()

2018-05-09T01:51:28Z

This will be used in future patches to check for arch support for pkeys in generic code. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen

x86/pkeys: Move vma_pkey() into asm/pkeys.h

2018-05-09T01:51:00Z

Move the last remaining pkey helper, vma_pkey() into asm/pkeys.h Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

2017-11-02T10:10:55Z

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/pkeys: Check against max pkey to avoid overflows

2017-03-01T09:51:50Z

Kirill reported a warning from UBSAN about undefined behavior when using protection keys. He is running on hardware that actually has support for it, which is not widely available. The warning triggers because of very large shifts of integers when doing a pkey_free() of a large, invalid value. This happens because we never check that the pkey "fits" into the mm_pkey_allocation_map(). I do not believe there is any danger here of anything bad happening other than some aliasing issues where somebody could do: pkey_free(35); and the kernel would effectively execute: pkey_free(8); While this might be confusing to an app that was doing something stupid, it has to do something stupid and the effects are limited to the app shooting itself in the foot. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: shuah@kernel.org Cc: kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170223222603.A022ED65@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner

x86/pkeys: Default to a restrictive init PKRU

2016-09-09T11:02:28Z

PKRU is the register that lets you disallow writes or all access to a given protection key. The XSAVE hardware defines an "init state" of 0 for PKRU: its most permissive state, allowing access/writes to everything. Since we start off all new processes with the init state, we start all processes off with the most permissive possible PKRU. This is unfortunate. If a thread is clone()'d [1] before a program has time to set PKRU to a restrictive value, that thread will be able to write to all data, no matter what pkey is set on it. This weakens any integrity guarantees that we want pkeys to provide. To fix this, we define a very restrictive PKRU to override the XSAVE-provided value when we create a new FPU context. We choose a value that only allows access to pkey 0, which is as restrictive as we can practically make it. This does not cause any practical problems with applications using protection keys because we require them to specify initial permissions for each key when it is allocated, which override the restrictive default. In the end, this ensures that threads which do not know how to manage their own pkey rights can not do damage to data which is pkey-protected. I would have thought this was a pretty contrived scenario, except that I heard a bug report from an MPX user who was creating threads in some very early code before main(). It may be crazy, but folks evidently _do_ it. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: mgorman@techsingularity.net Cc: arnd@arndb.de Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: luto@kernel.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160729163021.F3C25D4A@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner

x86/pkeys: Allocation/free syscalls

2016-09-09T11:02:27Z

This patch adds two new system calls: int pkey_alloc(unsigned long flags, unsigned long init_access_rights) int pkey_free(int pkey); These implement an "allocator" for the protection keys themselves, which can be thought of as analogous to the allocator that the kernel has for file descriptors. The kernel tracks which numbers are in use, and only allows operations on keys that are valid. A key which was not obtained by pkey_alloc() may not, for instance, be passed to pkey_mprotect(). These system calls are also very important given the kernel's use of pkeys to implement execute-only support. These help ensure that userspace can never assume that it has control of a key unless it first asks the kernel. The kernel does not promise to preserve PKRU (right register) contents except for allocated pkeys. The 'init_access_rights' argument to pkey_alloc() specifies the rights that will be established for the returned pkey. For instance: pkey = pkey_alloc(flags, PKEY_DENY_WRITE); will allocate 'pkey', but also sets the bits in PKRU[1] such that writing to 'pkey' is already denied. The kernel does not prevent pkey_free() from successfully freeing in-use pkeys (those still assigned to a memory range by pkey_mprotect()). It would be expensive to implement the checks for this, so we instead say, "Just don't do it" since sane software will never do it anyway. Any piece of userspace calling pkey_alloc() needs to be prepared for it to fail. Why? pkey_alloc() returns the same error code (ENOSPC) when there are no pkeys and when pkeys are unsupported. They can be unsupported for a whole host of reasons, so apps must be prepared for this. Also, libraries or LD_PRELOADs might steal keys before an application gets access to them. This allocation mechanism could be implemented in userspace. Even if we did it in userspace, we would still need additional user/kernel interfaces to tell userspace which keys are being used by the kernel internally (such as for execute-only mappings). Having the kernel provide this facility completely removes the need for these additional interfaces, or having an implementation of this in userspace at all. Note that we have to make changes to all of the architectures that do not use mman-common.h because we use the new PKEY_DENY_ACCESS/WRITE macros in arch-independent code. 1. PKRU is the Protection Key Rights User register. It is a usermode-accessible register that controls whether writes and/or access to each individual pkey is allowed or denied. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Acked-by: Mel Gorman Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: arnd@arndb.de Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: luto@kernel.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160729163015.444FE75F@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner