wireguard-linux/fs/ext4/ext4.h, branch jd/unified-crypt-queue

ext4: save all error info in save_error_info() and drop ext4_set_errno()

2020-04-01T21:29:06Z

Using a separate function, ext4_set_errno() to set the errno is problematic because it doesn't do the right thing once s_last_error_errorcode is non-zero. It's also less racy to set all of the error information all at once. (Also, as a bonus, it shrinks code size slightly.) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200329020404.686965-1-tytso@mit.edu Fixes: 878520ac45f9 ("ext4: save the error code which triggered...") Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o

ext4: remove EXT4_EOFBLOCKS_FL and associated code

2020-03-05T20:55:30Z

The EXT4_EOFBLOCKS_FL inode flag is used to indicate whether a file contains unwritten blocks past i_size. It's set when ext4_fallocate is called with the KEEP_SIZE flag to extend a file with an unwritten extent. However, this flag hasn't been useful functionally since March, 2012, when a decision was made to remove it from ext4. All traces of EXT4_EOFBLOCKS_FL were removed from e2fsprogs version 1.42.2 by commit 010dc7b90d97 ("e2fsck: remove EXT4_EOFBLOCKS_FL flag handling") at that time. Now that enough time has passed to make e2fsprogs versions containing this modification common, this patch now removes the code associated with EXT4_EOFBLOCKS_FL from the kernel as well. This change has two implications. First, because pre-1.42.2 e2fsck versions only look for a problem if EXT4_EOFBLOCKS_FL is set, and because that bit will never be set by newer kernels containing this patch, old versions of e2fsck won't have a compatibility problem with files created by newer kernels. Second, newer kernels will not clear EXT4_EOFBLOCKS_FL inode flag bits belonging to a file written by an older kernel. If set, it will remain in that state until the file is deleted. Because e2fsck versions since 1.42.2 don't check the flag at all, no adverse effect is expected. However, pre-1.42.2 e2fsck versions that do check the flag may report that it is set when it ought not to be after a file has been truncated or had its unwritten blocks written. In this case, the old version of e2fsck will offer to clear the flag. No adverse effect would then occur whether the user chooses to clear the flag or not. Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200211210216.24960-1-enwlinux@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o

ext4: fix race between writepages and enabling EXT4_EXTENTS_FL

2020-02-22T00:32:07Z

If EXT4_EXTENTS_FL is set on an inode while ext4_writepages() is running on it, the following warning in ext4_add_complete_io() can be hit: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at fs/ext4/page-io.c:234 ext4_put_io_end_defer+0xf0/0x120 Here's a minimal reproducer (not 100% reliable) (root isn't required): while true; do sync done & while true; do rm -f file touch file chattr -e file echo X >> file chattr +e file done The problem is that in ext4_writepages(), ext4_should_dioread_nolock() (which only returns true on extent-based files) is checked once to set the number of reserved journal credits, and also again later to select the flags for ext4_map_blocks() and copy the reserved journal handle to ext4_io_end::handle. But if EXT4_EXTENTS_FL is being concurrently set, the first check can see dioread_nolock disabled while the later one can see it enabled, causing the reserved handle to unexpectedly be NULL. Since changing EXT4_EXTENTS_FL is uncommon, and there may be other races related to doing so as well, fix this by synchronizing changing EXT4_EXTENTS_FL with ext4_writepages() via the existing s_writepages_rwsem (previously called s_journal_flag_rwsem). This was originally reported by syzbot without a reproducer at https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2202a584a00fffd19fbf, but now that dioread_nolock is the default I also started seeing this when running syzkaller locally. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200219183047.47417-3-ebiggers@kernel.org Reported-by: syzbot+2202a584a00fffd19fbf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 6b523df4fb5a ("ext4: use transaction reservation for extent conversion in ext4_end_io") Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Cc: stable@kernel.org

ext4: rename s_journal_flag_rwsem to s_writepages_rwsem

2020-02-22T00:32:07Z

In preparation for making s_journal_flag_rwsem synchronize ext4_writepages() with changes to both the EXTENTS and JOURNAL_DATA flags (rather than just JOURNAL_DATA as it does currently), rename it to s_writepages_rwsem. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200219183047.47417-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Cc: stable@kernel.org

ext4: fix potential race between s_flex_groups online resizing and access

2020-02-22T00:31:46Z

During an online resize an array of s_flex_groups structures gets replaced so it can get enlarged. If there is a concurrent access to the array and this memory has been reused then this can lead to an invalid memory access. The s_flex_group array has been converted into an array of pointers rather than an array of structures. This is to ensure that the information contained in the structures cannot get out of sync during a resize due to an accessor updating the value in the old structure after it has been copied but before the array pointer is updated. Since the structures them- selves are no longer copied but only the pointers to them this case is mitigated. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206443 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221053458.730016-4-tytso@mit.edu Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Cc: stable@kernel.org

ext4: fix potential race between s_group_info online resizing and access

2020-02-21T05:38:12Z

During an online resize an array of pointers to s_group_info gets replaced so it can get enlarged. If there is a concurrent access to the array in ext4_get_group_info() and this memory has been reused then this can lead to an invalid memory access. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206443 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221053458.730016-3-tytso@mit.edu Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Reviewed-by: Balbir Singh Cc: stable@kernel.org

ext4: fix potential race between online resizing and write operations

2020-02-21T05:37:09Z

During an online resize an array of pointers to buffer heads gets replaced so it can get enlarged. If there is a racing block allocation or deallocation which uses the old array, and the old array has gotten reused this can lead to a GPF or some other random kernel memory getting modified. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206443 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221053458.730016-2-tytso@mit.edu Reported-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Cc: stable@kernel.org

ext4: fix a data race in EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize

2020-02-20T04:17:02Z

EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize could be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN, BUG: KCSAN: data-race in ext4_write_end [ext4] / ext4_writepages [ext4] write to 0xffff91c6713b00f8 of 8 bytes by task 49268 on cpu 127: ext4_write_end+0x4e3/0x750 [ext4] ext4_update_i_disksize at fs/ext4/ext4.h:3032 (inlined by) ext4_update_inode_size at fs/ext4/ext4.h:3046 (inlined by) ext4_write_end at fs/ext4/inode.c:1287 generic_perform_write+0x208/0x2a0 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4] ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4] new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0 __vfs_write+0x92/0xa0 vfs_write+0x103/0x260 ksys_write+0x9d/0x130 __x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb47 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe read to 0xffff91c6713b00f8 of 8 bytes by task 24872 on cpu 37: ext4_writepages+0x10ac/0x1d00 [ext4] mpage_map_and_submit_extent at fs/ext4/inode.c:2468 (inlined by) ext4_writepages at fs/ext4/inode.c:2772 do_writepages+0x5e/0x130 __writeback_single_inode+0xeb/0xb20 writeback_sb_inodes+0x429/0x900 __writeback_inodes_wb+0xc4/0x150 wb_writeback+0x4bd/0x870 wb_workfn+0x6b4/0x960 process_one_work+0x54c/0xbe0 worker_thread+0x80/0x650 kthread+0x1e0/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 37 PID: 24872 Comm: kworker/u261:2 Tainted: G W O L 5.5.0-next-20200204+ #5 Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019 Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-7:0) Since only the read is operating as lockless (outside of the "i_data_sem"), load tearing could introduce a logic bug. Fix it by adding READ_ONCE() for the read and WRITE_ONCE() for the write. Signed-off-by: Qian Cai Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1581085751-31793-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Cc: stable@kernel.org

ext4: fix checksum errors with indexed dirs

2020-02-13T16:56:19Z

DIR_INDEX has been introduced as a compat ext4 feature. That means that even kernels / tools that don't understand the feature may modify the filesystem. This works because for kernels not understanding indexed dir format, internal htree nodes appear just as empty directory entries. Index dir aware kernels then check the htree structure is still consistent before using the data. This all worked reasonably well until metadata checksums were introduced. The problem is that these effectively made DIR_INDEX only ro-compatible because internal htree nodes store checksums in a different place than normal directory blocks. Thus any modification ignorant to DIR_INDEX (or just clearing EXT4_INDEX_FL from the inode) will effectively cause checksum mismatch and trigger kernel errors. So we have to be more careful when dealing with indexed directories on filesystems with checksumming enabled. 1) We just disallow loading any directory inodes with EXT4_INDEX_FL when DIR_INDEX is not enabled. This is harsh but it should be very rare (it means someone disabled DIR_INDEX on existing filesystem and didn't run e2fsck), e2fsck can fix the problem, and we don't want to answer the difficult question: "Should we rather corrupt the directory more or should we ignore that DIR_INDEX feature is not set?" 2) When we find out htree structure is corrupted (but the filesystem and the directory should in support htrees), we continue just ignoring htree information for reading but we refuse to add new entries to the directory to avoid corrupting it more. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200210144316.22081-1-jack@suse.cz Fixes: dbe89444042a ("ext4: Calculate and verify checksums for htree nodes") Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Cc: stable@kernel.org

ext4: drop ext4_kvmalloc()

2020-01-17T21:24:55Z

As Jan pointed out[1], as of commit 81378da64de ("jbd2: mark the transaction context with the scope GFP_NOFS context") we use memalloc_nofs_{save,restore}() while a jbd2 handle is active. So ext4_kvmalloc() so we can call allocate using GFP_NOFS is no longer necessary. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200109100007.GC27035@quack2.suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200116155031.266620-1-tytso@mit.edu Reviewed-by: Jan Kara