wireguard-linux/fs/ocfs2, branch jd/unified-crypt-queue

ocfs2: no need try to truncate file beyond i_size

2020-04-10T22:36:21Z

Linux fallocate(2) with FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE mode set, its offset can exceed the inode size. Ocfs2 now doesn't allow that offset beyond inode size. This restriction is not necessary and violates fallocate(2) semantics. If fallocate(2) offset is beyond inode size, just return success and do nothing further. Otherwise, ocfs2 will crash the kernel. kernel BUG at fs/ocfs2//alloc.c:7264! ocfs2_truncate_inline+0x20f/0x360 [ocfs2] ocfs2_remove_inode_range+0x23c/0xcb0 [ocfs2] __ocfs2_change_file_space+0x4a5/0x650 [ocfs2] ocfs2_fallocate+0x83/0xa0 [ocfs2] vfs_fallocate+0x148/0x230 SyS_fallocate+0x48/0x80 do_syscall_64+0x79/0x170 Signed-off-by: Changwei Ge Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi Cc: Mark Fasheh Cc: Joel Becker Cc: Junxiao Bi Cc: Changwei Ge Cc: Gang He Cc: Jun Piao Cc: Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200407082754.17565-1-chge@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ocfs2: use memalloc_nofs_save instead of memalloc_noio_save

2020-04-02T16:35:26Z

OCFS2 doesn't mind if memory reclaim makes I/Os happen; it just cares that it won't be reentered, so it can use memalloc_nofs_save() instead of memalloc_noio_save(). Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi Cc: Mark Fasheh Cc: Joel Becker Cc: Junxiao Bi Cc: Changwei Ge Cc: Gang He Cc: Jun Piao Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200326200214.1102-1-willy@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ocfs2: use scnprintf() for avoiding potential buffer overflow

2020-04-02T16:35:26Z

Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size instead of the actual output size, the succeeding calls may go beyond the given buffer limit. Fix it by replacing with scnprintf(). Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Acked-by: Joseph Qi Cc: Mark Fasheh Cc: Joel Becker Cc: Joseph Qi Cc: Changwei Ge Cc: Gang He Cc: Jun Piao Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200311093516.25300-1-tiwai@suse.de Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ocfs2: roll back the reference count modification of the parent directory if an error occurs

2020-04-02T16:35:26Z

Under some conditions, the directory cannot be deleted. The specific scenarios are as follows: (for example, /mnt/ocfs2 is the mount point) 1. Create the /mnt/ocfs2/p_dir directory. At this time, the i_nlink corresponding to the inode of the /mnt/ocfs2/p_dir directory is equal to 2. 2. During the process of creating the /mnt/ocfs2/p_dir/s_dir directory, if the call to the inc_nlink function in ocfs2_mknod succeeds, the functions such as ocfs2_init_acl, ocfs2_init_security_set, and ocfs2_dentry_attach_lock fail. At this time, the i_nlink corresponding to the inode of the /mnt/ocfs2/p_dir directory is equal to 3, but /mnt/ocfs2/p_dir/s_dir is not added to the /mnt/ocfs2/p_dir directory entry. 3. Delete the /mnt/ocfs2/p_dir directory (rm -rf /mnt/ocfs2/p_dir). At this time, it is found that the i_nlink corresponding to the inode corresponding to the /mnt/ocfs2/p_dir directory is equal to 3. Therefore, the /mnt/ocfs2/p_dir directory cannot be deleted. Signed-off-by: Jian wang Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Reviewed-by: Jun Piao Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi Cc: Mark Fasheh Cc: Joel Becker Cc: Junxiao Bi Cc: Changwei Ge Cc: Gang He Cc: Jun Piao Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/a44f6666-bbc4-405e-0e6c-0f4e922eeef6@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ocfs2: ocfs2_fs.h: replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

2020-04-02T16:35:26Z

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!OKPotRhYhHbCG2kibo8Q6_6CuKaa28d_74h1svxyR6rbshrK2L_BdrQpNbvJWBWb40QCkg$ [2] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!OKPotRhYhHbCG2kibo8Q6_6CuKaa28d_74h1svxyR6rbshrK2L_BdrQpNbvJWBUhNn9M6g$ [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Acked-by: Joseph Qi Cc: Mark Fasheh Cc: Joel Becker Cc: Junxiao Bi Cc: Changwei Ge Cc: Gang He Cc: Jun Piao Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200309202155.GA8432@embeddedor Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ocfs2: dlm: replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

2020-04-02T16:35:25Z

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!OVOYL_CouISa5L1Lw-20EEFQntw6cKMx-j8UdY4z78uYgzKBUFcfpn50GaurvbV5v7YiUA$ [2] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!OVOYL_CouISa5L1Lw-20EEFQntw6cKMx-j8UdY4z78uYgzKBUFcfpn50GaurvbXs8Eh8eg$ [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Acked-by: Joseph Qi Cc: Mark Fasheh Cc: Joel Becker Cc: Junxiao Bi Cc: Changwei Ge Cc: Gang He Cc: Jun Piao Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200309202016.GA8210@embeddedor Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ocfs2: cluster: replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

2020-04-02T16:35:25Z

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!NzMr-YRl2zy-K3lwLVVatz7x0uD2z7-ykQag4GrGigxmfWU8TWzDy6xrkTiW3hYl00czlw$ [2] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!NzMr-YRl2zy-K3lwLVVatz7x0uD2z7-ykQag4GrGigxmfWU8TWzDy6xrkTiW3hYHG1nAnw$ [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Acked-by: Joseph Qi Cc: Mark Fasheh Cc: Joel Becker Cc: Junxiao Bi Cc: Changwei Ge Cc: Gang He Cc: Jun Piao Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200309201907.GA8005@embeddedor Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ocfs2: replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

2020-04-02T16:35:25Z

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Acked-by: Joseph Qi Cc: Mark Fasheh Cc: Joel Becker Cc: Junxiao Bi Cc: Changwei Ge Cc: Gang He Cc: Jun Piao Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200213160244.GA6088@embeddedor Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ocfs2: add missing annotations for ocfs2_refcount_cache_lock() and ocfs2_refcount_cache_unlock()

2020-04-02T16:35:25Z

Sparse reports warnings at ocfs2_refcount_cache_lock() and ocfs2_refcount_cache_unlock() warning: context imbalance in ocfs2_refcount_cache_lock() - wrong count at exit warning: context imbalance in ocfs2_refcount_cache_unlock() - unexpected unlock The root cause is the missing annotation at ocfs2_refcount_cache_lock() and at ocfs2_refcount_cache_unlock() Add the missing __acquires(&rf->rf_lock) annotation to ocfs2_refcount_cache_lock() Add the missing __releases(&rf->rf_lock) annotation to ocfs2_refcount_cache_unlock() Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Acked-by: Joseph Qi Cc: Mark Fasheh Cc: Joel Becker Cc: Junxiao Bi Cc: Changwei Ge Cc: Gang He Cc: Jun Piao Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200224204130.18178-1-jbi.octave@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ocfs2: remove useless err

2020-04-02T16:35:25Z

We don't need 'err' in these 2 places, better to remove them. Signed-off-by: Alex Shi Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi Cc: Mark Fasheh Cc: Joel Becker Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Kate Stewart Cc: ChenGang Cc: Richard Fontana Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1579577836-251879-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds