wireguard-linux/net/rxrpc, branch jd/unified-crypt-queue

rxrpc: Fix DATA Tx to disable nofrag for UDP on AF_INET6 socket

2020-04-14T23:26:47Z

Fix the DATA packet transmission to disable nofrag for UDPv4 on an AF_INET6 socket as well as UDPv6 when trying to transmit fragmentably. Without this, packets filled to the normal size used by the kernel AFS client of 1412 bytes be rejected by udp_sendmsg() with EMSGSIZE immediately. The ->sk_error_report() notification hook is called, but rxrpc doesn't generate a trace for it. This is a temporary fix; a more permanent solution needs to involve changing the size of the packets being filled in accordance with the MTU, which isn't currently done in AF_RXRPC. The reason for not doing so was that, barring the last packet in an rx jumbo packet, jumbos can only be assembled out of 1412-byte packets - and the plan was to construct jumbos on the fly at transmission time. Also, there's no point turning on IPV6_MTU_DISCOVER, since IPv6 has to engage in this anyway since fragmentation is only done by the sender. We can then condense the switch-statement in rxrpc_send_data_packet(). Fixes: 75b54cb57ca3 ("rxrpc: Add IPv6 support") Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

KEYS: Don't write out to userspace while holding key semaphore

2020-03-29T11:40:41Z

A lockdep circular locking dependency report was seen when running a keyutils test: [12537.027242] ====================================================== [12537.059309] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [12537.088148] 4.18.0-147.7.1.el8_1.x86_64+debug #1 Tainted: G OE --------- - - [12537.125253] ------------------------------------------------------ [12537.153189] keyctl/25598 is trying to acquire lock: [12537.175087] 000000007c39f96c (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12537.208365] [12537.208365] but task is already holding lock: [12537.234507] 000000003de5b58d (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: keyctl_read_key+0x15a/0x220 [12537.270476] [12537.270476] which lock already depends on the new lock. [12537.270476] [12537.307209] [12537.307209] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [12537.340754] [12537.340754] -> #3 (&type->lock_class){++++}: [12537.367434] down_write+0x4d/0x110 [12537.385202] __key_link_begin+0x87/0x280 [12537.405232] request_key_and_link+0x483/0xf70 [12537.427221] request_key+0x3c/0x80 [12537.444839] dns_query+0x1db/0x5a5 [dns_resolver] [12537.468445] dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip+0x1e1/0x4d0 [cifs] [12537.496731] cifs_reconnect+0xe04/0x2500 [cifs] [12537.519418] cifs_readv_from_socket+0x461/0x690 [cifs] [12537.546263] cifs_read_from_socket+0xa0/0xe0 [cifs] [12537.573551] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x311/0x2db0 [cifs] [12537.601045] kthread+0x30c/0x3d0 [12537.617906] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [12537.636225] [12537.636225] -> #2 (root_key_user.cons_lock){+.+.}: [12537.664525] __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11f0 [12537.683734] request_key_and_link+0x35a/0xf70 [12537.705640] request_key+0x3c/0x80 [12537.723304] dns_query+0x1db/0x5a5 [dns_resolver] [12537.746773] dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip+0x1e1/0x4d0 [cifs] [12537.775607] cifs_reconnect+0xe04/0x2500 [cifs] [12537.798322] cifs_readv_from_socket+0x461/0x690 [cifs] [12537.823369] cifs_read_from_socket+0xa0/0xe0 [cifs] [12537.847262] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x311/0x2db0 [cifs] [12537.873477] kthread+0x30c/0x3d0 [12537.890281] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [12537.908649] [12537.908649] -> #1 (&tcp_ses->srv_mutex){+.+.}: [12537.935225] __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11f0 [12537.954450] cifs_call_async+0x102/0x7f0 [cifs] [12537.977250] smb2_async_readv+0x6c3/0xc90 [cifs] [12538.000659] cifs_readpages+0x120a/0x1e50 [cifs] [12538.023920] read_pages+0xf5/0x560 [12538.041583] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x41d/0x4b0 [12538.067047] ondemand_readahead+0x44c/0xc10 [12538.092069] filemap_fault+0xec1/0x1830 [12538.111637] __do_fault+0x82/0x260 [12538.129216] do_fault+0x419/0xfb0 [12538.146390] __handle_mm_fault+0x862/0xdf0 [12538.167408] handle_mm_fault+0x154/0x550 [12538.187401] __do_page_fault+0x42f/0xa60 [12538.207395] do_page_fault+0x38/0x5e0 [12538.225777] page_fault+0x1e/0x30 [12538.243010] [12538.243010] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: [12538.267875] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x420 [12538.286848] __might_fault+0x119/0x1b0 [12538.306006] keyring_read_iterator+0x7e/0x170 [12538.327936] assoc_array_subtree_iterate+0x97/0x280 [12538.352154] keyring_read+0xe9/0x110 [12538.370558] keyctl_read_key+0x1b9/0x220 [12538.391470] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4b0 [12538.410511] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf [12538.435535] [12538.435535] other info that might help us debug this: [12538.435535] [12538.472829] Chain exists of: [12538.472829] &mm->mmap_sem --> root_key_user.cons_lock --> &type->lock_class [12538.472829] [12538.524820] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [12538.524820] [12538.551431] CPU0 CPU1 [12538.572654] ---- ---- [12538.595865] lock(&type->lock_class); [12538.613737] lock(root_key_user.cons_lock); [12538.644234] lock(&type->lock_class); [12538.672410] lock(&mm->mmap_sem); [12538.687758] [12538.687758] *** DEADLOCK *** [12538.687758] [12538.714455] 1 lock held by keyctl/25598: [12538.732097] #0: 000000003de5b58d (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: keyctl_read_key+0x15a/0x220 [12538.770573] [12538.770573] stack backtrace: [12538.790136] CPU: 2 PID: 25598 Comm: keyctl Kdump: loaded Tainted: G [12538.844855] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9/ProLiant DL360 Gen9, BIOS P89 12/27/2015 [12538.881963] Call Trace: [12538.892897] dump_stack+0x9a/0xf0 [12538.907908] print_circular_bug.isra.25.cold.50+0x1bc/0x279 [12538.932891] ? save_trace+0xd6/0x250 [12538.948979] check_prev_add.constprop.32+0xc36/0x14f0 [12538.971643] ? keyring_compare_object+0x104/0x190 [12538.992738] ? check_usage+0x550/0x550 [12539.009845] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 [12539.025484] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x1e0 [12539.043555] __lock_acquire+0x1f12/0x38d0 [12539.061551] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x10/0x10 [12539.080554] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x420 [12539.100330] ? __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12539.119079] __might_fault+0x119/0x1b0 [12539.135869] ? __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12539.153234] keyring_read_iterator+0x7e/0x170 [12539.172787] ? keyring_read+0x110/0x110 [12539.190059] assoc_array_subtree_iterate+0x97/0x280 [12539.211526] keyring_read+0xe9/0x110 [12539.227561] ? keyring_gc_check_iterator+0xc0/0xc0 [12539.249076] keyctl_read_key+0x1b9/0x220 [12539.266660] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4b0 [12539.283091] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf One way to prevent this deadlock scenario from happening is to not allow writing to userspace while holding the key semaphore. Instead, an internal buffer is allocated for getting the keys out from the read method first before copying them out to userspace without holding the lock. That requires taking out the __user modifier from all the relevant read methods as well as additional changes to not use any userspace write helpers. That is, 1) The put_user() call is replaced by a direct copy. 2) The copy_to_user() call is replaced by memcpy(). 3) All the fault handling code is removed. Compiling on a x86-64 system, the size of the rxrpc_read() function is reduced from 3795 bytes to 2384 bytes with this patch. Fixes: ^1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Waiman Long Signed-off-by: David Howells

afs: Fix client call Rx-phase signal handling

2020-03-13T23:04:35Z

Fix the handling of signals in client rxrpc calls made by the afs filesystem. Ignore signals completely, leaving call abandonment or connection loss to be detected by timeouts inside AF_RXRPC. Allowing a filesystem call to be interrupted after the entire request has been transmitted and an abort sent means that the server may or may not have done the action - and we don't know. It may even be worse than that for older servers. Fixes: bc5e3a546d55 ("rxrpc: Use MSG_WAITALL to tell sendmsg() to temporarily ignore signals") Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Fix sendmsg(MSG_WAITALL) handling

2020-03-13T23:04:34Z

Fix the handling of sendmsg() with MSG_WAITALL for userspace to round the timeout for when a signal occurs up to at least two jiffies as a 1 jiffy timeout may end up being effectively 0 if jiffies wraps at the wrong time. Fixes: bc5e3a546d55 ("rxrpc: Use MSG_WAITALL to tell sendmsg() to temporarily ignore signals") Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Fix call interruptibility handling

2020-03-13T23:04:30Z

Fix the interruptibility of kernel-initiated client calls so that they're either only interruptible when they're waiting for a call slot to come available or they're not interruptible at all. Either way, they're not interruptible during transmission. This should help prevent StoreData calls from being interrupted when writeback is in progress. It doesn't, however, handle interruption during the receive phase. Userspace-initiated calls are still interruptable. After the signal has been handled, sendmsg() will return the amount of data copied out of the buffer and userspace can perform another sendmsg() call to continue transmission. Fixes: bc5e3a546d55 ("rxrpc: Use MSG_WAITALL to tell sendmsg() to temporarily ignore signals") Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Abstract out the calculation of whether there's Tx space

2020-03-13T23:04:28Z

Abstract out the calculation of there being sufficient Tx buffer space. This is reproduced several times in the rxrpc sendmsg code. Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Fix call RCU cleanup using non-bh-safe locks

2020-02-07T10:20:57Z

rxrpc_rcu_destroy_call(), which is called as an RCU callback to clean up a put call, calls rxrpc_put_connection() which, deep in its bowels, takes a number of spinlocks in a non-BH-safe way, including rxrpc_conn_id_lock and local->client_conns_lock. RCU callbacks, however, are normally called from softirq context, which can cause lockdep to notice the locking inconsistency. To get lockdep to detect this, it's necessary to have the connection cleaned up on the put at the end of the last of its calls, though normally the clean up is deferred. This can be induced, however, by starting a call on an AF_RXRPC socket and then closing the socket without reading the reply. Fix this by having rxrpc_rcu_destroy_call() punt the destruction to a workqueue if in softirq-mode and defer the destruction to process context. Note that another way to fix this could be to add a bunch of bh-disable annotations to the spinlocks concerned - and there might be more than just those two - but that means spending more time with BHs disabled. Note also that some of these places were covered by bh-disable spinlocks belonging to the rxrpc_transport object, but these got removed without the _bh annotation being retained on the next lock in. Fixes: 999b69f89241 ("rxrpc: Kill the client connection bundle concept") Reported-by: syzbot+d82f3ac8d87e7ccbb2c9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+3f1fd6b8cbf8702d134e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Hillf Danton Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rxrpc: Fix service call disconnection

2020-02-07T10:19:38Z

The recent patch that substituted a flag on an rxrpc_call for the connection pointer being NULL as an indication that a call was disconnected puts the set_bit in the wrong place for service calls. This is only a problem if a call is implicitly terminated by a new call coming in on the same connection channel instead of a terminating ACK packet. In such a case, rxrpc_input_implicit_end_call() calls __rxrpc_disconnect_call(), which is now (incorrectly) setting the disconnection bit, meaning that when rxrpc_release_call() is later called, it doesn't call rxrpc_disconnect_call() and so the call isn't removed from the peer's error distribution list and the list gets corrupted. KASAN finds the issue as an access after release on a call, but the position at which it occurs is confusing as it appears to be related to a different call (the call site is where the latter call is being removed from the error distribution list and either the next or pprev pointer points to a previously released call). Fix this by moving the setting of the flag from __rxrpc_disconnect_call() to rxrpc_disconnect_call() in the same place that the connection pointer was being cleared. Fixes: 5273a191dca6 ("rxrpc: Fix NULL pointer deref due to call->conn being cleared on disconnect") Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rxrpc: Fix NULL pointer deref due to call->conn being cleared on disconnect

2020-02-03T10:25:30Z

When a call is disconnected, the connection pointer from the call is cleared to make sure it isn't used again and to prevent further attempted transmission for the call. Unfortunately, there might be a daemon trying to use it at the same time to transmit a packet. Fix this by keeping call->conn set, but setting a flag on the call to indicate disconnection instead. Remove also the bits in the transmission functions where the conn pointer is checked and a ref taken under spinlock as this is now redundant. Fixes: 8d94aa381dab ("rxrpc: Calls shouldn't hold socket refs") Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Fix missing active use pinning of rxrpc_local object

2020-01-30T21:50:41Z

The introduction of a split between the reference count on rxrpc_local objects and the usage count didn't quite go far enough. A number of kernel work items need to make use of the socket to perform transmission. These also need to get an active count on the local object to prevent the socket from being closed. Fix this by getting the active count in those places. Also split out the raw active count get/put functions as these places tend to hold refs on the rxrpc_local object already, so getting and putting an extra object ref is just a waste of time. The problem can lead to symptoms like: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018 .. CPU: 2 PID: 818 Comm: kworker/u9:0 Not tainted 5.5.0-fscache+ #51 ... RIP: 0010:selinux_socket_sendmsg+0x5/0x13 ... Call Trace: security_socket_sendmsg+0x2c/0x3e sock_sendmsg+0x1a/0x46 rxrpc_send_keepalive+0x131/0x1ae rxrpc_peer_keepalive_worker+0x219/0x34b process_one_work+0x18e/0x271 worker_thread+0x1a3/0x247 kthread+0xe6/0xeb ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Fixes: 730c5fd42c1e ("rxrpc: Fix local endpoint refcounting") Signed-off-by: David Howells