<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>wireguard-linux/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/direct, branch jd/unified-crypt-queue</title>
<subtitle>WireGuard for the Linux kernel</subtitle>
<id>https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux/atom/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/direct?h=jd%2Funified-crypt-queue</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux/atom/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/direct?h=jd%2Funified-crypt-queue'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux/'/>
<updated>2019-11-15T16:30:38Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>ftrace/selftests: Fix spelling mistake "wakeing" -&gt; "waking"</title>
<updated>2019-11-15T16:30:38Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Colin Ian King</name>
<email>colin.king@canonical.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-11-15T08:59:38Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux/commit/?id=760f8bc7c89c87bff9c01a8746e85dcc6e771ea8'/>
<id>urn:sha1:760f8bc7c89c87bff9c01a8746e85dcc6e771ea8</id>
<content type='text'>
There is a spelling mistake in a trace_printk message. As well as in
the selftests that search for this string.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191115085938.38947-1-colin.king@canonical.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191115090356.39572-1-colin.king@canonical.com

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King &lt;colin.king@canonical.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) &lt;rostedt@goodmis.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ftrace/selftests: Update the direct call selftests to test two direct calls</title>
<updated>2019-11-13T14:36:49Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Steven Rostedt (VMware)</name>
<email>rostedt@goodmis.org</email>
</author>
<published>2019-11-08T21:08:12Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux/commit/?id=ed9dafebce52206382de96bd5bbdff22335930f6'/>
<id>urn:sha1:ed9dafebce52206382de96bd5bbdff22335930f6</id>
<content type='text'>
The register_ftrace_direct() takes a different path if there's already a
direct call registered, but this was not tested in the self tests. Now that
there's a second direct caller test module, we can use this to test not only
one direct caller, but two.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) &lt;rostedt@goodmis.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ftrace/selftest: Add tests to test register_ftrace_direct()</title>
<updated>2019-11-13T14:36:49Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Steven Rostedt (VMware)</name>
<email>rostedt@goodmis.org</email>
</author>
<published>2019-11-08T17:19:14Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux/commit/?id=646f01ccdd59f989f0a1866d2b3503e1855358d8'/>
<id>urn:sha1:646f01ccdd59f989f0a1866d2b3503e1855358d8</id>
<content type='text'>
Add two test cases that test the new ftrace direct functionality if the
ftrace-direct sample module is available. One test case tests against each
available tracer (function, function_graph, mmiotrace, etc), and the other
test tests against a kprobe at the same location as the direct caller. Both
tests follow the same pattern of testing combinations:

  enable test (either the tracer or the kprobe)
  load direct function module
  unload direct function module
  disable test

  enable test
  load direct function module
  disable test
  unload direct function module

  load direct function module
  enable test
  disable test
  unload direct function module

  load direct function module
  enable test
  unload direct function module
  disable test

As most the bugs in development happened with various ways of enabling or
disabling the direct calls with function tracer in one of these
combinations.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) &lt;rostedt@goodmis.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
