aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstatshomepage
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMichal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>2024-12-19 10:49:32 +0100
committerJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>2024-12-23 10:28:01 -0800
commitf66ef469a72d19764f943067307a570f83b00dca (patch)
tree722c2cffb54b38922a5c54afc8c4c696a53df6e0
parentvsock/test: Adapt send_byte()/recv_byte() to handle MSG_ZEROCOPY (diff)
downloadwireguard-linux-f66ef469a72d19764f943067307a570f83b00dca.tar.xz
wireguard-linux-f66ef469a72d19764f943067307a570f83b00dca.zip
vsock/test: Add test for accept_queue memory leak
Attempt to enqueue a child after the queue was flushed, but before SOCK_DONE flag has been set. Test tries to produce a memory leak, kmemleak should be employed. Dealing with a race condition, test by its very nature may lead to a false negative. Fixed by commit d7b0ff5a8667 ("virtio/vsock: Fix accept_queue memory leak"). Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241219-test-vsock-leaks-v4-5-a416e554d9d7@rbox.co Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c52
1 files changed, 52 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
index 8bb2ab41c55f..2a8fcb062d9d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
@@ -29,6 +29,10 @@
#include "control.h"
#include "util.h"
+/* Basic messages for control_writeulong(), control_readulong() */
+#define CONTROL_CONTINUE 1
+#define CONTROL_DONE 0
+
static void test_stream_connection_reset(const struct test_opts *opts)
{
union {
@@ -1474,6 +1478,49 @@ static void test_stream_cred_upd_on_set_rcvlowat(const struct test_opts *opts)
test_stream_credit_update_test(opts, false);
}
+/* The goal of test leak_acceptq is to stress the race between connect() and
+ * close(listener). Implementation of client/server loops boils down to:
+ *
+ * client server
+ * ------ ------
+ * write(CONTINUE)
+ * expect(CONTINUE)
+ * listen()
+ * write(LISTENING)
+ * expect(LISTENING)
+ * connect() close()
+ */
+#define ACCEPTQ_LEAK_RACE_TIMEOUT 2 /* seconds */
+
+static void test_stream_leak_acceptq_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
+{
+ time_t tout;
+ int fd;
+
+ tout = current_nsec() + ACCEPTQ_LEAK_RACE_TIMEOUT * NSEC_PER_SEC;
+ do {
+ control_writeulong(CONTROL_CONTINUE);
+
+ fd = vsock_stream_connect(opts->peer_cid, opts->peer_port);
+ if (fd >= 0)
+ close(fd);
+ } while (current_nsec() < tout);
+
+ control_writeulong(CONTROL_DONE);
+}
+
+/* Test for a memory leak. User is expected to run kmemleak scan, see README. */
+static void test_stream_leak_acceptq_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
+{
+ int fd;
+
+ while (control_readulong() == CONTROL_CONTINUE) {
+ fd = vsock_stream_listen(VMADDR_CID_ANY, opts->peer_port);
+ control_writeln("LISTENING");
+ close(fd);
+ }
+}
+
static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
{
.name = "SOCK_STREAM connection reset",
@@ -1604,6 +1651,11 @@ static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
.run_client = test_seqpacket_unsent_bytes_client,
.run_server = test_seqpacket_unsent_bytes_server,
},
+ {
+ .name = "SOCK_STREAM leak accept queue",
+ .run_client = test_stream_leak_acceptq_client,
+ .run_server = test_stream_leak_acceptq_server,
+ },
{},
};