diff options
author | 2025-04-05 00:42:19 +0800 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2025-04-08 11:36:32 +0530 | |
commit | fc5414a4774e14e51a93499a6adfdc45f2de82e0 (patch) | |
tree | ce3a1b728fb48605057b8b6aa878e64e6307716e | |
parent | cpufreq: sun50i: prevent out-of-bounds access (diff) | |
download | wireguard-linux-fc5414a4774e14e51a93499a6adfdc45f2de82e0.tar.xz wireguard-linux-fc5414a4774e14e51a93499a6adfdc45f2de82e0.zip |
cpufreq: Add SM8650 to cpufreq-dt-platdev blocklist
SM8650 have already been supported by qcom-cpufreq-hw driver, but
never been added to cpufreq-dt-platdev. This makes noise
[ 0.388525] cpufreq-dt cpufreq-dt: failed register driver: -17
[ 0.388537] cpufreq-dt cpufreq-dt: probe with driver cpufreq-dt failed with error -17
So adding it to the cpufreq-dt-platdev driver's blocklist to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Pengyu Luo <mitltlatltl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 1 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c index 2aa00769cf09..a010da0f6337 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c @@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id blocklist[] __initconst = { { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350", }, { .compatible = "qcom,sm8450", }, { .compatible = "qcom,sm8550", }, + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8650", }, { .compatible = "st,stih407", }, { .compatible = "st,stih410", }, |