aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstatshomepage
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>2020-04-27 18:05:47 +0300
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2020-04-30 20:41:14 -0700
commit6ef4889fc0b3aa6ab928e7565935ac6f762cee6e (patch)
tree1f72a34e7582403b181ac15865dbb2a282991005
parenttunnel: Propagate ECT(1) when decapsulating as recommended by RFC6040 (diff)
downloadwireguard-linux-6ef4889fc0b3aa6ab928e7565935ac6f762cee6e.tar.xz
wireguard-linux-6ef4889fc0b3aa6ab928e7565935ac6f762cee6e.zip
mlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Position vchunk in a vregion list properly
Vregion helpers to get min and max priority depend on the correct ordering of vchunks in the vregion list. However, the current code always adds new chunk to the end of the list, no matter what the priority is. Fix this by finding the correct place in the list and put vchunk there. Fixes: 22a677661f56 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Introduce ACL core with simple TCAM implementation") Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c12
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c
index 430da69003d8..a6e30e020b5c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c
@@ -986,8 +986,9 @@ mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_create(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
unsigned int priority,
struct mlxsw_afk_element_usage *elusage)
{
+ struct mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk *vchunk, *vchunk2;
struct mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion *vregion;
- struct mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk *vchunk;
+ struct list_head *pos;
int err;
if (priority == MLXSW_SP_ACL_TCAM_CATCHALL_PRIO)
@@ -1025,7 +1026,14 @@ mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_create(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
}
mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_rehash_ctx_vregion_changed(vregion);
- list_add_tail(&vchunk->list, &vregion->vchunk_list);
+
+ /* Position the vchunk inside the list according to priority */
+ list_for_each(pos, &vregion->vchunk_list) {
+ vchunk2 = list_entry(pos, typeof(*vchunk2), list);
+ if (vchunk2->priority > priority)
+ break;
+ }
+ list_add_tail(&vchunk->list, pos);
mutex_unlock(&vregion->lock);
return vchunk;