diff options
| author |   Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> | 2012-02-09 16:16:28 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> | 2012-03-24 09:38:54 +0000 |
| commit | 5936d1161ff503a1170722fe9b2d9ac4da700eef (patch) | |
| tree | 266428ad16aa785fb7436e248ac9103b591c9c20 /arch/um/kernel/process.c | |
| parent | ARM: 7319/1: Print debug info for SIGBUS in user faults (diff) | |
| download | wireguard-linux-5936d1161ff503a1170722fe9b2d9ac4da700eef.tar.xz wireguard-linux-5936d1161ff503a1170722fe9b2d9ac4da700eef.zip | |
ARM: get rid of asm/irq.h in asm/prom.h
Avoid potential build problems caused by lacking mach/irqs.h includes
on non-OF builds caused by an errant include in asm/prom.h. asm/prom.h
requires nothing from asm/irq.h, as Grant says:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 05:56:23AM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 10:17:48PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > Finally, do we need asm/irq.h in our asm/prom.h ? That's causing
> > fragility between DT and non-DT builds, because people are finding
> > that their DT builds work without their mach/irqs.h includes but
> > fail when built with non-DT. The only thing which DT might need -
> > at the most - is NR_IRQS, but I'd hope with things like irq domains
> > it doesn't actually require it.
>
> I don't think so. There may be a file or two that break because they're
> not including everything they need, but I don't think anything in the
> header requires it.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/um/kernel/process.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions