locking/core: Remove {read,spin,write}_can_lock()

Outside of the locking code itself, {read,spin,write}_can_lock() have no
users in tree. Apparmor (the last remaining user of write_can_lock()) got
moved over to lockdep by the previous patch.

This patch removes the use of {read,spin,write}_can_lock() from the
BUILD_LOCK_OPS macro, deferring to the trylock operation for testing the
lock status, and subsequently removes the unused macros altogether. They
aren't guaranteed to work in a concurrent environment and can give
incorrect results in the case of qrwlock.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507055129-12300-2-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h
index 69e079c5ff98..1e3e48041800 100644
--- a/include/linux/spinlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h
@@ -278,12 +278,6 @@ static inline void do_raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) __releases(lock)
 	1 : ({ local_irq_restore(flags); 0; }); \
 })
 
-/**
- * raw_spin_can_lock - would raw_spin_trylock() succeed?
- * @lock: the spinlock in question.
- */
-#define raw_spin_can_lock(lock)	(!raw_spin_is_locked(lock))
-
 /* Include rwlock functions */
 #include <linux/rwlock.h>
 
@@ -396,11 +390,6 @@ static __always_inline int spin_is_contended(spinlock_t *lock)
 	return raw_spin_is_contended(&lock->rlock);
 }
 
-static __always_inline int spin_can_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
-{
-	return raw_spin_can_lock(&lock->rlock);
-}
-
 #define assert_spin_locked(lock)	assert_raw_spin_locked(&(lock)->rlock)
 
 /*