diff options
| author | 2010-08-22 17:35:32 +0000 | |
|---|---|---|
| committer | 2010-08-22 21:09:04 -0700 | |
| commit | c2368e795cec561229ef66a04ac51629b918a9e8 (patch) | |
| tree | 2fd08484e8948dc2969ac2d01b00af175b93abb5 /net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | |
| parent | net: rds: remove duplication type definitions (diff) | |
| download | wireguard-linux-c2368e795cec561229ef66a04ac51629b918a9e8.tar.xz wireguard-linux-c2368e795cec561229ef66a04ac51629b918a9e8.zip | |
bridge: is PACKET_LOOPBACK unlikely()?
While looking at using netdev_rx_handler_register for openvswitch Jesse
Gross suggested that an unlikely() might be worthwhile in that code.
I'm interested to see if its appropriate for the bridge code.
Cc: Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ipv4/tcp_output.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
