diff options
author | 2010-12-12 00:23:33 -0800 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2011-01-06 15:19:20 +0000 | |
commit | b7b1a29d94c17e4341856381bccb4d17495bea60 (patch) | |
tree | 855932e331bcbb2f9c2889d879786005552a1f72 /tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c | |
parent | mtd: nand: choose correct chip name (ONFI bug) (diff) | |
download | wireguard-linux-b7b1a29d94c17e4341856381bccb4d17495bea60.tar.xz wireguard-linux-b7b1a29d94c17e4341856381bccb4d17495bea60.zip |
mtd: nand: rearrange ONFI revision checking, add ONFI 2.3
In checking for the ONFI revision, the first conditional (for checking
"unsupported" ONFI) seems unnecessary. All ONFI revisions should be
backwards-compatible; even if this is not the case on some newer ONFI
revision, it should simply fail the second version-checking if-else block
(i.e., the bit-fields for 1.0, 2.0, etc. would not be set to 1). Thus, we
move our "unsupported" condition after having checked each bit field.
Also, it's simple enough to add a condition for ONFI revision 2.3. Note
that this does *NOT* mean we handle all new features of ONFI versions
above 1.0.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <ffainelli@freebox.fr>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions