diff options
| author |   Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> | 2020-06-25 16:13:57 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2020-06-30 10:45:08 -0700 |
| commit | 6ebb85c83aaf6ae75b920ef45d2a9eee42079265 (patch) | |
| tree | 738b98ec90d00d22a30a333a033aef20583d8c8b /tools | |
| parent | bpf, netns: Keep a list of attached bpf_link's (diff) | |
| download | wireguard-linux-6ebb85c83aaf6ae75b920ef45d2a9eee42079265.tar.xz wireguard-linux-6ebb85c83aaf6ae75b920ef45d2a9eee42079265.zip | |
selftests/bpf: Test updating flow_dissector link with same program
This case, while not particularly useful, is worth covering because we
expect the operation to succeed as opposed when re-attaching the same
program directly with PROG_ATTACH.
While at it, update the tests summary that fell out of sync when tests
extended to cover links.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200625141357.910330-5-jakub@cloudflare.com
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector_reattach.c | 32 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector_reattach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector_reattach.c index 15cb554a66d8..a2db3b0f84db 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector_reattach.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector_reattach.c @@ -1,9 +1,6 @@ // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 /* - * Test that the flow_dissector program can be updated with a single - * syscall by attaching a new program that replaces the existing one. - * - * Corner case - the same program cannot be attached twice. + * Tests for attaching, detaching, and replacing flow_dissector BPF program. */ #define _GNU_SOURCE @@ -308,6 +305,31 @@ static void test_link_update_replace_old_prog(int netns, int prog1, int prog2) CHECK_FAIL(prog_is_attached(netns)); } +static void test_link_update_same_prog(int netns, int prog1, int prog2) +{ + DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_link_create_opts, create_opts); + DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_link_update_opts, update_opts); + int err, link; + + link = bpf_link_create(prog1, netns, BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR, &create_opts); + if (CHECK_FAIL(link < 0)) { + perror("bpf_link_create(prog1)"); + return; + } + CHECK_FAIL(query_attached_prog_id(netns) != query_prog_id(prog1)); + + /* Expect success updating the prog with the same one */ + update_opts.flags = 0; + update_opts.old_prog_fd = 0; + err = bpf_link_update(link, prog1, &update_opts); + if (CHECK_FAIL(err)) + perror("bpf_link_update"); + CHECK_FAIL(query_attached_prog_id(netns) != query_prog_id(prog1)); + + close(link); + CHECK_FAIL(prog_is_attached(netns)); +} + static void test_link_update_invalid_opts(int netns, int prog1, int prog2) { DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_link_create_opts, create_opts); @@ -571,6 +593,8 @@ static void run_tests(int netns) test_link_update_no_old_prog }, { "link update with replace old prog", test_link_update_replace_old_prog }, + { "link update with same prog", + test_link_update_same_prog }, { "link update invalid opts", test_link_update_invalid_opts }, { "link update invalid prog", |