diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/gfp.h | 8 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/page_alloc.c | 15 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/page_owner.c | 2 |
4 files changed, 14 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/gfp.h b/include/linux/gfp.h index c9fa6309c903..be160e8d8bcb 100644 --- a/include/linux/gfp.h +++ b/include/linux/gfp.h @@ -45,13 +45,13 @@ static inline bool gfpflags_allow_spinning(const gfp_t gfp_flags) * !__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM -> direct claim is not allowed. * !__GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM -> it's not safe to wake up kswapd. * All GFP_* flags including GFP_NOWAIT use one or both flags. - * try_alloc_pages() is the only API that doesn't specify either flag. + * alloc_pages_nolock() is the only API that doesn't specify either flag. * * This is stronger than GFP_NOWAIT or GFP_ATOMIC because * those are guaranteed to never block on a sleeping lock. * Here we are enforcing that the allocation doesn't ever spin * on any locks (i.e. only trylocks). There is no high level - * GFP_$FOO flag for this use in try_alloc_pages() as the + * GFP_$FOO flag for this use in alloc_pages_nolock() as the * regular page allocator doesn't fully support this * allocation mode. */ @@ -354,8 +354,8 @@ static inline struct page *alloc_page_vma_noprof(gfp_t gfp, } #define alloc_page_vma(...) alloc_hooks(alloc_page_vma_noprof(__VA_ARGS__)) -struct page *try_alloc_pages_noprof(int nid, unsigned int order); -#define try_alloc_pages(...) alloc_hooks(try_alloc_pages_noprof(__VA_ARGS__)) +struct page *alloc_pages_nolock_noprof(int nid, unsigned int order); +#define alloc_pages_nolock(...) alloc_hooks(alloc_pages_nolock_noprof(__VA_ARGS__)) extern unsigned long get_free_pages_noprof(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order); #define __get_free_pages(...) alloc_hooks(get_free_pages_noprof(__VA_ARGS__)) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 64c3393e8270..9cdb4f22640f 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static bool can_alloc_pages(void) static struct page *__bpf_alloc_page(int nid) { if (!can_alloc_pages()) - return try_alloc_pages(nid, 0); + return alloc_pages_nolock(nid, 0); return alloc_pages_node(nid, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_ACCOUNT diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 4ee55edf1ad7..dbafa7c69a6a 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -5070,7 +5070,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__free_pages); /* * Can be called while holding raw_spin_lock or from IRQ and NMI for any - * page type (not only those that came from try_alloc_pages) + * page type (not only those that came from alloc_pages_nolock) */ void free_pages_nolock(struct page *page, unsigned int order) { @@ -7311,20 +7311,21 @@ static bool __free_unaccepted(struct page *page) #endif /* CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY */ /** - * try_alloc_pages - opportunistic reentrant allocation from any context + * alloc_pages_nolock - opportunistic reentrant allocation from any context * @nid: node to allocate from * @order: allocation order size * * Allocates pages of a given order from the given node. This is safe to * call from any context (from atomic, NMI, and also reentrant - * allocator -> tracepoint -> try_alloc_pages_noprof). + * allocator -> tracepoint -> alloc_pages_nolock_noprof). * Allocation is best effort and to be expected to fail easily so nobody should * rely on the success. Failures are not reported via warn_alloc(). * See always fail conditions below. * - * Return: allocated page or NULL on failure. + * Return: allocated page or NULL on failure. NULL does not mean EBUSY or EAGAIN. + * It means ENOMEM. There is no reason to call it again and expect !NULL. */ -struct page *try_alloc_pages_noprof(int nid, unsigned int order) +struct page *alloc_pages_nolock_noprof(int nid, unsigned int order) { /* * Do not specify __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM, since direct claim is not allowed. @@ -7333,7 +7334,7 @@ struct page *try_alloc_pages_noprof(int nid, unsigned int order) * * These two are the conditions for gfpflags_allow_spinning() being true. * - * Specify __GFP_NOWARN since failing try_alloc_pages() is not a reason + * Specify __GFP_NOWARN since failing alloc_pages_nolock() is not a reason * to warn. Also warn would trigger printk() which is unsafe from * various contexts. We cannot use printk_deferred_enter() to mitigate, * since the running context is unknown. @@ -7343,7 +7344,7 @@ struct page *try_alloc_pages_noprof(int nid, unsigned int order) * BPF use cases. * * Though __GFP_NOMEMALLOC is not checked in the code path below, - * specify it here to highlight that try_alloc_pages() + * specify it here to highlight that alloc_pages_nolock() * doesn't want to deplete reserves. */ gfp_t alloc_gfp = __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC diff --git a/mm/page_owner.c b/mm/page_owner.c index cc4a6916eec6..9928c9ac8c31 100644 --- a/mm/page_owner.c +++ b/mm/page_owner.c @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ void __reset_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned short order) /* * Do not specify GFP_NOWAIT to make gfpflags_allow_spinning() == false * to prevent issues in stack_depot_save(). - * This is similar to try_alloc_pages() gfp flags, but only used + * This is similar to alloc_pages_nolock() gfp flags, but only used * to signal stack_depot to avoid spin_locks. */ handle = save_stack(__GFP_NOWARN); |