aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstatshomepage
path: root/.cocciconfig (unfollow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-05-13bpf: Enable bpf_iter targets registering ctx argument typesYonghong Song10-12/+60
Commit b121b341e598 ("bpf: Add PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL support") adds a field btf_id_or_null_non0_off to bpf_prog->aux structure to indicate that the first ctx argument is PTR_TO_BTF_ID reg_type and all others are PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL. This approach does not really scale if we have other different reg types in the future, e.g., a pointer to a buffer. This patch enables bpf_iter targets registering ctx argument reg types which may be different from the default one. For example, for pointers to structures, the default reg_type is PTR_TO_BTF_ID for tracing program. The target can register a particular pointer type as PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL which can be used by the verifier to enforce accesses. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200513180221.2949882-1-yhs@fb.com
2020-05-13bpf: Change func bpf_iter_unreg_target() signatureYonghong Song3-4/+4
Change func bpf_iter_unreg_target() parameter from target name to target reg_info, similar to bpf_iter_reg_target(). Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200513180220.2949737-1-yhs@fb.com
2020-05-13bpf: net: Refactor bpf_iter target registrationYonghong Song6-61/+61
Currently bpf_iter_reg_target takes parameters from target and allocates memory to save them. This is really not necessary, esp. in the future we may grow information passed from targets to bpf_iter manager. The patch refactors the code so target reg_info becomes static and bpf_iter manager can just take a reference to it. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200513180219.2949605-1-yhs@fb.com
2020-05-13bpf: Add comments to interpret bpf_prog return valuesYonghong Song1-0/+6
Add a short comment in bpf_iter_run_prog() function to explain how bpf_prog return value is converted to seq_ops->show() return value: bpf_prog return seq_ops()->show() return 0 0 1 -EAGAIN When show() return value is -EAGAIN, the current bpf_seq_read() will end. If the current seq_file buffer is empty, -EAGAIN will return to user space. Otherwise, the buffer will be copied to user space. In both cases, the next bpf_seq_read() call will try to show the same object which returned -EAGAIN previously. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200513180218.2949517-1-yhs@fb.com
2020-05-13bpf: Change btf_iter func proto prefix to "bpf_iter_"Yonghong Song2-4/+4
This is to be consistent with tracing and lsm programs which have prefix "bpf_trace_" and "bpf_lsm_" respectively. Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200513180216.2949387-1-yhs@fb.com