Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
use intel_uc_uses_guc_submission() directly instead, to be consistent in
the way we check what we want to do with the GuC.
v2: do not go through ctx->vm->gt, use i915->gt instead
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> #v1
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
|
|
When setting up the system to perform the atomic reset, we need to
serialise with any ongoing interrupt tasklet or else:
<0> [472.951428] i915_sel-4442 0d..1 466527056us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 11659:2, current 0
<0> [472.951554] i915_sel-4442 0d..1 466527059us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0: queue_priority_hint:-2147483648, submit:yes
<0> [472.951681] i915_sel-4442 0d..1 466527061us : trace_ports: rcs0: submit { 11659:2, 0:0 }
<0> [472.951805] i915_sel-4442 0.... 466527114us : __igt_atomic_reset_engine: i915_reset_engine(rcs0:active) under hardirq
<0> [472.951932] i915_sel-4442 0d... 466527115us : intel_engine_reset: rcs0 flags=11d
<0> [472.952056] i915_sel-4442 0d... 466527117us : execlists_reset_prepare: rcs0: depth<-1
<0> [472.952179] i915_sel-4442 0d... 466527119us : intel_engine_stop_cs: rcs0
<0> [472.952305] <idle>-0 1..s1 466527119us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=3, tail=4
<0> [472.952431] i915_sel-4442 0d... 466527122us : __intel_gt_reset: engine_mask=1
<0> [472.952557] <idle>-0 1..s1 466527124us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[4]: status=0x00000001:0x00000000
<0> [472.952683] <idle>-0 1..s1 466527130us : trace_ports: rcs0: promote { 11659:2*, 0:0 }
<0> [472.952808] i915_sel-4442 0d... 466527131us : execlists_reset: rcs0
<0> [472.952933] i915_sel-4442 0d..1 466527133us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=3, tail=4
<0> [472.953059] i915_sel-4442 0d..1 466527134us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[4]: status=0x00000001:0x00000000
<0> [472.953185] i915_sel-4442 0d..1 466527136us : trace_ports: rcs0: preempted { 11659:2*, 0:0 }
<0> [472.953310] i915_sel-4442 0d..1 466527150us : assert_pending_valid: Nothing pending for promotion!
<0> [472.953436] i915_sel-4442 0d..1 466527158us : process_csb: process_csb:1930 GEM_BUG_ON(!assert_pending_valid(execlists, "promote"))
We have the same CSB events being seen by process_csb() on two different
processors. One being issued by the reset in the test, the other by the
interrupt; this scenario is supposed to be prevented by flushing the
interrupt tasklet with tasklet_disable() before we enter the atomic
reset.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112069
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191023232443.17450-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Where the function, or code segment, operates on intel_gt, we need to
start passing it instead of i915 to for_each_engine(_masked).
This is another partial step in migration of i915->engines[] to
gt->engines[].
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191017094500.21831-2-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
|
|
Avoid going to the base i915 device when we already have a path from gt
to the runtime powermanagement interface. The benefit is that it looks a
bit more self-consistent to always be acquiring the gt->uncore->rpm for
use with the gt->uncore.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191007154531.1750-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
As we execute GPU resets on a gt/ basis, and use the intel_gt as the
primary for all other reset functions, also use it for the has-reset?
predicates. Gradually simplifying the churn of pointers.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190927211749.2181-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Having taken the first step in encapsulating the functionality by moving
the related files under gt/, the next step is to start encapsulating by
passing around the relevant structs rather than the global
drm_i915_private. In this step, we pass intel_gt to intel_reset.c
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190712192953.9187-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
If we issue a reset to a currently idle engine, leave it idle
afterwards. This is useful to excise a linkage between reset and the
shrinker. When waking the engine, we need to pin the default context
image which we use for overwriting a guilty context -- if the engine is
idle we do not need this pinned image! However, this pinning means that
waking the engine acquires the FS_RECLAIM, and so may trigger the
shrinker. The shrinker itself may need to wait upon the GPU to unbind
and object and so may require services of reset; ergo we should avoid
the engine wake up path.
The danger in skipping the recovery for idle engines is that we leave the
engine with no context defined, which may interfere with the operation of
the power context on some older platforms. In practice, we should only
be resetting an active GPU but it something to look out for on Ironlake
(if memory serves).
Fixes: 79ffac8599c4 ("drm/i915: Invert the GEM wakeref hierarchy")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190626154549.10066-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
We require that the intel_gpu_reset() was atomic, not the whole of
i915_reset() which is guarded by a mutex. However, we do require that
i915_reset_engine() is atomic for use from within the submission tasklet.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190626134433.6318-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
We no longer need to manually acquire a wakeref for request emission, so
drop the redundant wakerefs, letting us test our wakeref handling more
precisely.
References: 79ffac8599c4 ("drm/i915: Invert the GEM wakeref hierarchy")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190626134433.6318-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Matching the underlying get/put functions.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613232156.34940-8-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
|
|
The functions where internally already only using the structure, so we
need to just flip the interface.
v2: rebase
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613232156.34940-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
|
|
We were testing full GPU reset in atomic context without correctly
wrapping it by prepare/finish steps. This could confuse our GuC
reset handling code.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190522193203.23932-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
|
|
Split igt_atomic_reset selftests into separate full & engines parts,
so we can move former to the dedicated reset selftests file.
While here change engines test to loop first over atomic phases and
then loop over available engines.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190522193203.23932-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
|
|
igt_global_reset and igt_wedged_reset testcases are first candidates.
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190522193203.23932-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
|