aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstatshomepage
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-04-18drm/i915: Pack params to engine->schedule() into a structChris Wilson1-2/+2
Today we only want to pass along the priority to engine->schedule(), but in the future we want to have much more control over the various aspects of the GPU during a context's execution, for example controlling the frequency allowed. As we need an ever growing number of parameters for scheduling, move those into a struct for convenience. v2: Move the anonymous struct into its own function for legibility and ye olde gcc. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180418184052.7129-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-04-18drm/i915: Rename priotree to schedChris Wilson1-32/+34
Having moved the priotree struct into i915_scheduler.h, identify it as the scheduling element and rebrand into i915_sched. This becomes more useful as we start attaching more information we require to propagate through the scheduler. v2: Use i915_sched_node for future distinctiveness Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180418184052.7129-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-04-09drm/i915/execlists: Log fence context & seqno throughout GEM_TRACETvrtko Ursulin1-3/+3
Include fence context and seqno in low level tracing so it is easier to follow flows of individual requests when things go bad. Also added tracing on the reset side of things. v2: Chris Wilson: * Standardize global_seqno and seqno as global. * Include current hws seqno in execlists_cancel_port_requests. v3: * Fix port printk format for all builds. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> # v2 Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180406123514.5809-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
2018-04-06drm/i915: Pass the set of guilty engines to i915_reset()Chris Wilson1-2/+4
Currently, we rely on inspecting the hangcheck state from within the i915_reset() routines to determine which engines were guilty of the hang. This is problematic for cases where we want to run i915_handle_error() and call i915_reset() independently of hangcheck. Instead of relying on the indirect parameter passing, turn it into an explicit parameter providing the set of stalled engines which then are treated as guilty until proven innocent. While we are removing the implicit stalled parameter, also make the reason into an explicit parameter to i915_reset(). We still need a back-channel for i915_handle_error() to hand over the task to the locked waiter, but let's keep that its own channel rather than incriminate another. This leaves stalled/seqno as being private to hangcheck, with no more nefarious snooping by reset, be it whole-device or per-engine. \o/ The only real issue now is that this makes it crystal clear that we don't actually do any testing of hangcheck per se in drv_selftest/live_hangcheck, merely of resets! Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180406220354.18911-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-04-06drm/i915: Split out parking from the idle worker for reuseChris Wilson1-49/+3
We will want to park GEM before disengaging the drive^W^W^W unwedging. Since we already do the work for idling, expose the guts as a new function that we can then reuse. v2: Just skip if already parked; makes it more forgiving to use by future callers. v3: Extract mark_busy, rename it to i915_gem_unpark and place it next to i915_gem_park so that we can evaluate it for symmetry more easily. Calling GEM from inside i915_request looks to be a bit of a layering violation, for the moment I am imaging them as being notify_cb. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> #v1 Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180406155144.27791-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-03-29drm/i915: Include the HW breadcrumb whenever we trace the global_seqnoChris Wilson1-11/+17
When we include a request's global_seqno in a GEM_TRACE it often helps to know how that relates to the current breadcrumb as seen by the hardware. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180327210157.16896-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
2018-03-22drm/i915: Remove local timeline var from submit/unsubmitChris Wilson1-15/+15
Both request_submit and request_unsubmit deal with transferring the request from the client's timeline onto the execution timeline and back again. As both functions deal with a pair of timeline's, using a shorthand for just one of them is slightly confusing, especially as the different functions use the shorthand for the alternate timeline. Instead, use the full version of each timeline so it should be easier to keep track of the transfer between the request/client and the engine. v2: Refactor the common lock+list_move v3: Be clear we require the other timeline list to be locked as well. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180322131034.6036-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-03-22drm/i915: Fix tracing of submit seqnoChris Wilson1-1/+1
We pre-increment the timeline->seqno when handing it to the request, make sure the GEM_TRACE takes this into account. Otherwise, it appears that we go backwards over a preemption point: 1d..1 157681077us : __i915_request_unsubmit: vcs0 fence 75e:3 <- global_seqno 17 0d.s1 157681113us : __i915_request_submit: vcs0 fence 75e:3 -> global_seqno 16 Fixes: d9b13c4dde6c ("drm/i915: Trace GEM steps between submit and wedging") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180322110059.4467-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-03-20drm/i915: Add control flags to i915_handle_error()Chris Wilson1-1/+1
Not all callers want the GPU error to handled in the same way, so expose a control parameter. In the first instance, some callers do not want the heavyweight error capture so add a bit to request the state to be captured and saved. v2: Pass msg down to i915_reset/i915_reset_engine so that we include the reason for the reset in the dev_notice(), superseding the earlier option to not print that notice. v3: Stash the reason inside the i915->gpu_error to handover to the direct reset from the blocking waiter. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180320100449.1360-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-03-16drm/i915: Trace GEM steps between submit and wedgingChris Wilson1-0/+23
We still have an odd race with wedging/unwedging as shown by igt/gem_eio that defies expectations. Add some more trace_printks to try and visualize the flow over the precipice. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180315131451.4060-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-03-12drm/i915: Remove the impedance mismatch around intel_engine_enable_signalingChris Wilson1-5/+1
There is some redundancy between dma_fence->ops->enable_signaling (via i915_fence_enable_signaling) and our backend, intel_engine_enable_signaling() in that both levels recheck the fence status multiple times. If we convert intel_engine_enable_signaling() to return the information desired by dma_fence->ops->enable_signaling, we can reduce i915_fence_enable_signaling to a simple stub and avoid trying to reinterpret the same information. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180308140732.25090-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-03-09drm/i915: Wrap engine->schedule in RCU locks for set-wedge protectionChris Wilson1-0/+2
Similar to the staging around handling of engine->submit_request, we need to stop adding to the execlists->queue prior to calling engine->cancel_requests. cancel_requests will move requests from the queue onto the timeline, so if we add a request onto the queue after that point, it will be lost. Fixes: af7a8ffad9c5 ("drm/i915: Use rcu instead of stop_machine in set_wedged") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307134226.25492-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-03-09drm/i915: Update ring position from request on retiringChris Wilson1-1/+1
When wedged, we do not update the ring->tail as we submit the requests causing us to leak the ring->space upon cleaning up the wedged driver. We can just use the value stored in rq->tail, and keep the submission backend details away from set-wedge. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307134226.25492-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-03-06drm/i915: Flush waiters on seqno wraparoundChris Wilson1-4/+2
Previously, we would spin waiting for all waiters to wake up and notice their request had completed before we would reset the seqno upon wraparound. However, we can mark their waits as complete and wake them up directly using the existing machinery for handling the flushing of missed wakeups when idling. Suggested-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180306130143.13312-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-03-06drm/i915: Stop kicking the signaling thread on seqno wraparoundChris Wilson1-0/+2
Since commit fd10e2ce9905 ("drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Ignore unsubmitted signalers"), we cancel the signaler when retiring the request and so upon wraparound, where we wait for all requests to be retired, we no longer need to spin waiting for the signaling thread to release its references to the in-flight requests, and so we can assert that the signaler is idle. References: fd10e2ce9905 ("drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Ignore unsubmitted signalers") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180306130143.13312-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-02-23drm/i915: Update missing parts after the rename to i915_requestMichel Thierry1-2/+2
Mostly doc/print messages that were not updated after commit e61e0f51ba79 ("drm/i915: Rename drm_i915_gem_request to i915_request"). Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180222172405.11386-1-michel.thierry@intel.com
2018-02-21drm/i915: Rename drm_i915_gem_request to i915_requestChris Wilson1-0/+1411
We want to de-emphasize the link between the request (dependency, execution and fence tracking) from GEM and so rename the struct from drm_i915_gem_request to i915_request. That is we may implement the GEM user interface on top of requests, but they are an abstraction for tracking execution rather than an implementation detail of GEM. (Since they are not tied to HW, we keep the i915 prefix as opposed to intel.) In short, the spatch: @@ @@ - struct drm_i915_gem_request + struct i915_request A corollary to contracting the type name, we also harmonise on using 'rq' shorthand for local variables where space if of the essence and repetition makes 'request' unwieldy. For globals and struct members, 'request' is still much preferred for its clarity. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180221095636.6649-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>