aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstatshomepage
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-11-22drm/i915: Use a ctor for TYPESAFE_BY_RCU i915_requestChris Wilson1-0/+1
As we start peeking into requests for longer and longer, e.g. incorporating use of spinlocks when only protected by an rcu_read_lock(), we need to be careful in how we reset the request when recycling and need to preserve any barriers that may still be in use as the request is reset for reuse. Quoting Linus Torvalds: > If there is refcounting going on then why use SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU? .. because the object can be accessed (by RCU) after the refcount has gone down to zero, and the thing has been released. That's the whole and only point of SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU. That flag basically says: "I may end up accessing this object *after* it has been free'd, because there may be RCU lookups in flight" This has nothing to do with constructors. It's ok if the object gets reused as an object of the same type and does *not* get re-initialized, because we're perfectly fine seeing old stale data. What it guarantees is that the slab isn't shared with any other kind of object, _and_ that the underlying pages are free'd after an RCU quiescent period (so the pages aren't shared with another kind of object either during an RCU walk). And it doesn't necessarily have to have a constructor, because the thing that a RCU walk will care about is (a) guaranteed to be an object that *has* been on some RCU list (so it's not a "new" object) (b) the RCU walk needs to have logic to verify that it's still the *same* object and hasn't been re-used as something else. In contrast, a SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU memory gets free'd and re-used immediately, but because it gets reused as the same kind of object, the RCU walker can "know" what parts have meaning for re-use, in a way it couidn't if the re-use was random. That said, it *is* subtle, and people should be careful. > So the re-use might initialize the fields lazily, not necessarily using a ctor. If you have a well-defined refcount, and use "atomic_inc_not_zero()" to guard the speculative RCU access section, and use "atomic_dec_and_test()" in the freeing section, then you should be safe wrt new allocations. If you have a completely new allocation that has "random stale content", you know that it cannot be on the RCU list, so there is no speculative access that can ever see that random content. So the only case you need to worry about is a re-use allocation, and you know that the refcount will start out as zero even if you don't have a constructor. So you can think of the refcount itself as always having a zero constructor, *BUT* you need to be careful with ordering. In particular, whoever does the allocation needs to then set the refcount to a non-zero value *after* it has initialized all the other fields. And in particular, it needs to make sure that it uses the proper memory ordering to do so. NOTE! One thing to be very worried about is that re-initializing whatever RCU lists means that now the RCU walker may be walking on the wrong list so the walker may do the right thing for this particular entry, but it may miss walking *other* entries. So then you can get spurious lookup failures, because the RCU walker never walked all the way to the end of the right list. That ends up being a much more subtle bug. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191122094924.629690-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-18drm/i915/execlists: Don't merely skip submission if maybe timeslicingChris Wilson1-18/+0
Normally, we try and skip submission if ELSP[1] is filled. However, we may desire to enable timeslicing due to the queue priority, even if ELSP[1] itself does not require timeslicing. That is the queue is equal priority to ELSP[0] and higher priority then ELSP[1]. Previously, we would wait until the context switch to preempt the current ELSP[1], but with timeslicing, we want to preempt ELSP[0] and replace it with the queue. In writing the test case, it become quickly apparent that we were also suppressing the tasklet during promotion and so failing to notice when the queue started requiring timeslicing. Fixes: 2229adc81380 ("drm/i915/execlist: Trim immediate timeslice expiry") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191018072027.31948-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-05-07drm/i915: Only reschedule the submission tasklet if preemption is possibleChris Wilson1-0/+18
If we couple the scheduler more tightly with the execlists policy, we can apply the preemption policy to the question of whether we need to kick the tasklet at all for this priority bump. v2: Rephrase it as a core i915 policy and not an execlists foible. v3: Pull the kick together. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190507122544.12698-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-04-02drm/i915: Move intel_engine_mask_t around for use by i915_request_types.hChris Wilson1-84/+2
We want to use intel_engine_mask_t inside i915_request.h, which means extracting it from the general header file mess and placing it inside a types.h. A knock on effect is that the compiler wants to warn about type-contraction of ALL_ENGINES into intel_engine_maskt_t, so prepare for the worst. v2: Use intel_engine_mask_t consistently v3: Move I915_NUM_ENGINES to its natural home at the end of the enum Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190401162641.10963-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
2019-03-06drm/i915: Use i915_global_register()Chris Wilson1-4/+0
Rather than manually add every new global into each hook, use i915_global_register() function and keep a list of registered globals to invoke instead. However, I haven't found a way for random drivers to add an .init table to avoid having to manually add ourselves to i915_globals_init() each time. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190305213830.18094-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
2019-03-01drm/i915: Prioritise non-busywait semaphore workloadsChris Wilson1-3/+6
We don't want to busywait on the GPU if we have other work to do. If we give non-busywaiting workloads higher (initial) priority than workloads that require a busywait, we will prioritise work that is ready to run immediately. We then also have to be careful that we don't give earlier semaphores an accidental boost because later work doesn't wait on other rings, hence we keep a history of semaphore usage of the dependency chain. v2: Stop rolling the bits into a chain and just use a flag in case this request or any of our dependencies use a semaphore. The rolling around was contagious as Tvrtko was heard to fall off his chair. Testcase: igt/gem_exec_schedule/semaphore Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190301170901.8340-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-02-28drm/i915/execlists: Suppress mere WAIT preemptionChris Wilson1-0/+2
WAIT is occasionally suppressed by virtue of preempted requests being promoted to NEWCLIENT if they have not all ready received that boost. Make this consistent for all WAIT boosts that they are not allowed to preempt executing contexts and are merely granted the right to be at the front of the queue for the next execution slot. This is in keeping with the desire that the WAIT boost be a minor tweak that does not give excessive promotion to its user and open ourselves to trivial abuse. The problem with the inconsistent WAIT preemption becomes more apparent as the preemption is propagated across the engines, where one engine may preempt and the other not, and we be relying on the exact execution order being consistent across engines (e.g. using HW semaphores to coordinate parallel execution). v2: Also protect GuC submission from false preemption loops. v3: Build bug safeguards and better debug messages for st. v4: Do the priority bumping in unsubmit (i.e. on preemption/reset unwind), applying it earlier during submit causes out-of-order execution combined with execute fences. v5: Call sw_fence_fini for our dummy request (Matthew) Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190228220639.3173-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-02-28drm/i915: Use __ffs() in for_each_priolist for more compact codeChris Wilson1-2/+4
Gcc has a slight preference if we use __ffs() to subtract one from the index once rather than each use: __execlists_submission_tasklet 2867 2847 -20 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190226102404.29153-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-02-28drm/i915: Make request allocation caches globalChris Wilson1-4/+30
As kmem_caches share the same properties (size, allocation/free behaviour) for all potential devices, we can use global caches. While this potential has worse fragmentation behaviour (one can argue that different devices would have different activity lifetimes, but you can also argue that activity is temporal across the system) it is the default behaviour of the system at large to amalgamate matching caches. The benefit for us is much reduced pointer dancing along the frequent allocation paths. v2: Defer shrinking until after a global grace period for futureproofing multiple consumers of the slab caches, similar to the current strategy for avoiding shrinking too early. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190228102035.5857-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-10-01drm/i915: Priority boost for waiting clientsChris Wilson1-2/+5
Latency is in the eye of the beholder. In the case where a client stops and waits for the gpu, give that request chain a small priority boost (not so that it overtakes higher priority clients, to preserve the external ordering) so that ideally the wait completes earlier. v2: Tvrtko recommends to keep the boost-from-user-stall as small as possible and to allow new client flows to be preferred for interactivity over stalls. Testcase: igt/gem_sync/switch-default Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dmitry Rogozhkin <dmitry.v.rogozhkin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181001144755.7978-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-10-01drm/i915: Pull scheduling under standalone lockChris Wilson1-0/+25
Currently, the backend scheduling code abuses struct_mutex into order to have a global lock to manipulate a temporary list (without widespread allocation) and to protect against list modifications. This is an extraneous coupling to struct_mutex and further can not extend beyond the local device. Pull all the code that needs to be under the one true lock into i915_scheduler.c, and make it so. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181001144755.7978-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-10-01drm/i915: Priority boost for new clientsChris Wilson1-1/+3
Taken from an idea used for FQ_CODEL, we give the first request of a new request flows a small priority boost. These flows are likely to correspond with short, interactive tasks and so be more latency sensitive than the longer free running queues. As soon as the client has more than one request in the queue, further requests are not boosted and it settles down into ordinary steady state behaviour. Such small kicks dramatically help combat the starvation issue, by allowing each client the opportunity to run even when the system is under heavy throughput load (within the constraints of the user selected priority). v2: Mark the preempted request as the start of a new flow, to prevent a single client being continually gazumped by its peers. Testcase: igt/benchmarks/rrul Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181001144755.7978-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-10-01drm/i915: Reserve some priority bits for internal useChris Wilson1-0/+6
In the next few patches, we will want to give a small priority boost to some requests/queues but not so much that we perturb the user controlled order. As such we will shift the user priority bits higher leaving ourselves a few low priority bits for our internal bumping. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181001123204.23982-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-04-18drm/i915: Pack params to engine->schedule() into a structChris Wilson1-1/+16
Today we only want to pass along the priority to engine->schedule(), but in the future we want to have much more control over the various aspects of the GPU during a context's execution, for example controlling the frequency allowed. As we need an ever growing number of parameters for scheduling, move those into a struct for convenience. v2: Move the anonymous struct into its own function for legibility and ye olde gcc. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180418184052.7129-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-04-18drm/i915: Rename priotree to schedChris Wilson1-2/+2
Having moved the priotree struct into i915_scheduler.h, identify it as the scheduling element and rebrand into i915_sched. This becomes more useful as we start attaching more information we require to propagate through the scheduler. v2: Use i915_sched_node for future distinctiveness Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180418184052.7129-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-04-18drm/i915: Move the priotree struct to its own headersChris Wilson1-0/+57
Over time the priotree has grown from a sorted list to a more complicated structure for propagating constraints along the dependency chain to try and resolve priority inversion. Start to segregate this information from the rest of the request/fence tracking. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180418184052.7129-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk