| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
- Marking a non-static function as inline doesn't actually work and is
now causing problems - drop that
- Introduce BCACHEFS_LOG_PREFIX for when we want to prefix log messages
with bcachefs (filesystem name)
- Userspace doesn't have real percpu variables (maybe we can get this
fixed someday), put an #ifdef around bch2_disk_reservation_add()
fastpath
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
checkpatch.pl gives lots of warnings that we don't want - suggested
ignore list:
ASSIGN_IN_IF
UNSPECIFIED_INT - bcachefs coding style prefers single token type names
NEW_TYPEDEFS - typedefs are occasionally good
FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS - we prefer to look at functions in .c files
(hopefully with docbook documentation), not .h
file prototypes
MULTISTATEMENT_MACRO_USE_DO_WHILE
- we have _many_ x-macros and other macros where
we can't do this
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
We were removing 1 more entry than we were supposed to - oops.
Also some other simplifications and cleanups, and bring back the abort
preference code in a better fashion.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
We'd like to prioritize aborting transactions that have done less work -
however, it appears breaking cycles by telling other threads to abort
may still be buggy, so disable that for now.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
Some lock operations can't fail; a cycle of nofail locks is impossible
to recover from. So we want to get rid of these nofail locking
operations, but as this is tricky it'll be done incrementally.
If such a cycle happens, this patch prints out which codepaths are
involved so we know what to work on next.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
Useful debugging function.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
This changes bch2_check_for_deadlock() to print the longest chains it
finds - when we have a deadlock because the cycle detector isn't finding
something, this will let us see what it's missing.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
Most of the node_relock_fail trace events are generated from
bch2_btree_path_verify_level(), when debugcheck_iterators is enabled -
but we're not interested in these trace events, they don't indicate that
we're in a slowpath.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
In order for bch2_btree_node_lock_write_nofail() to never produce a
deadlock, we must ensure we're never holding read locks when using it.
Fortunately, it's only used from code paths where any read locks may be
safely dropped.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
This deletes our old lock ordering based deadlock avoidance code.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
|
|
In the event that we're not finished debugging the cycle detector, this
adds a new file to debugfs that shows what the cycle detector finds, if
anything. By comparing this with btree_transactions, which shows held
locks for every btree_transaction, we'll be able to determine if it's
the cycle detector that's buggy or something else.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
We've outgrown our own deadlock avoidance strategy.
The btree iterator API provides an interface where the user doesn't need
to concern themselves with lock ordering - different btree iterators can
be traversed in any order. Without special care, this will lead to
deadlocks.
Our previous strategy was to define a lock ordering internally, and
whenever we attempt to take a lock and trylock() fails, we'd check if
the current btree transaction is holding any locks that cause a lock
ordering violation. If so, we'd issue a transaction restart, and then
bch2_trans_begin() would re-traverse all previously used iterators, but
in the correct order.
That approach had some issues, though.
- Sometimes we'd issue transaction restarts unnecessarily, when no
deadlock would have actually occured. Lock ordering restarts have
become our primary cause of transaction restarts, on some workloads
totally 20% of actual transaction commits.
- To avoid deadlock or livelock, we'd often have to take intent locks
when we only wanted a read lock: with the lock ordering approach, it
is actually illegal to hold _any_ read lock while blocking on an intent
lock, and this has been causing us unnecessary lock contention.
- It was getting fragile - the various lock ordering rules are not
trivial, and we'd been seeing occasional livelock issues related to
this machinery.
So, since bcachefs is already a relational database masquerading as a
filesystem, we're stealing the next traditional database technique and
switching to a cycle detector for avoiding deadlocks.
When we block taking a btree lock, after adding ourself to the waitlist
but before sleeping, we do a DFS of btree transactions waiting on other
btree transactions, starting with the current transaction and walking
our held locks, and transactions blocking on our held locks.
If we find a cycle, we emit a transaction restart. Occasionally (e.g.
the btree split path) we can not allow the lock() operation to fail, so
if necessary we'll tell another transaction that it has to fail.
Result: trans_restart_would_deadlock events are reduced by a factor of
10 to 100, and we'll be able to delete a whole bunch of grotty, fragile
code.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
|
|
Previously, if we were trying to upgrade from a read to an intent lock
but we held an additional read lock via another btree_path,
bch2_btree_node_upgrade() would always fail, in six_lock_tryupgrade().
This patch factors out the code that __bch2_btree_node_lock_write() uses
to temporarily drop extra read locks, so that six_lock_tryupgrade() can
succeed.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
|
|
Little bit of tidying up, this makes the counters a little bit clearer
as to what's happening.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
Ideally, all the code in btree_locking.c should be converted, but then
we'd want to convert btree_path to point to btree_key_cached_common too,
and then we'd be in for a much bigger cleanup - but a bit of incremental
cleanup will still be helpful for the next patches.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
Add a type descriptor to btree_bkey_cached_common - there's no reason
not to since we've got padding that was otherwise unused, and this is a
nice cleanup (and helpful in later patches).
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
Have to be careful with bit fields - when subtracting, this was
overflowing into the write_locking bit.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
In the future, with the new deadlock cycle detector, we won't be using
bare six_lock_* anymore: lock wait entries will all be embedded in
btree_trans, and we will need a btree_trans context whenever locking a
btree node.
This patch plumbs a btree_trans to the few places that need it, and adds
two new locking functions
- btree_node_lock_nopath, which may fail returning a transaction
restart, and
- btree_node_lock_nopath_nofail, to be used in places where we know we
cannot deadlock (i.e. because we're holding no other locks).
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
|
|
Also, do some reorganizing/renaming, convert atomic counters in bch_fs
to persistent counters, and add a few missing counters.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
This moves the IS_ERR_OR_NULL() check to the inline part, since that's a
fast path event.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
It now prints the error name when the btree node is an error pointer;
also, don't trace failures when the the btree node is
BCH_ERR_no_btree_node_up.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
The upcoming lock cycle detection code will need to know precisely which
locks every btree_trans is holding, including write locks - this patch
updates btree_node_locked_type to include write locks.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
This is just some type safety cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
|
|
six_lock_count now counts up whether a write lock held, and this patch
now also correctly counts six_lock->intent_lock_recurse.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
|
|
Held btree locks are tracked in btree_path->nodes_locked and
btree_path->nodes_intent_locked. Upcoming patches are going to change
the representation in struct btree_path, so this patch switches to
proper helpers instead of direct access to these fields.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
|
|
Tidy things up a bit before doing more work in this file.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
|
|
Start to centralize some of the locking code in a new file; more locking
code will be moving here in the future.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
|
Kent Overstreet
Kent Overstreet