aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstatshomepage
path: root/fs/btrfs/send.c (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-06-02Merge tag 'for-5.8-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linuxLinus Torvalds1-17/+72
Pull btrfs updates from David Sterba: "Highlights: - speedup dead root detection during orphan cleanup, eg. when there are many deleted subvolumes waiting to be cleaned, the trees are now looked up in radix tree instead of a O(N^2) search - snapshot creation with inherited qgroup will mark the qgroup inconsistent, requires a rescan - send will emit file capabilities after chown, this produces a stream that does not need postprocessing to set the capabilities again - direct io ported to iomap infrastructure, cleaned up and simplified code, notably removing last use of struct buffer_head in btrfs code Core changes: - factor out backreference iteration, to be used by ordinary backreferences and relocation code - improved global block reserve utilization * better logic to serialize requests * increased maximum available for unlink * improved handling on large pages (64K) - direct io cleanups and fixes * simplify layering, where cloned bios were unnecessarily created for some cases * error handling fixes (submit, endio) * remove repair worker thread, used to avoid deadlocks during repair - refactored block group reading code, preparatory work for new type of block group storage that should improve mount time on large filesystems Cleanups: - cleaned up (and slightly sped up) set/get helpers for metadata data structure members - root bit REF_COWS got renamed to SHAREABLE to reflect the that the blocks of the tree get shared either among subvolumes or with the relocation trees Fixes: - when subvolume deletion fails due to ENOSPC, the filesystem is not turned read-only - device scan deals with devices from other filesystems that changed ownership due to overwrite (mkfs) - fix a race between scrub and block group removal/allocation - fix long standing bug of a runaway balance operation, printing the same line to the syslog, caused by a stale status bit on a reloc tree that prevented progress - fix corrupt log due to concurrent fsync of inodes with shared extents - fix space underflow for NODATACOW and buffered writes when it for some reason needs to fallback to COW mode" * tag 'for-5.8-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: (133 commits) btrfs: fix space_info bytes_may_use underflow during space cache writeout btrfs: fix space_info bytes_may_use underflow after nocow buffered write btrfs: fix wrong file range cleanup after an error filling dealloc range btrfs: remove redundant local variable in read_block_for_search btrfs: open code key_search btrfs: split btrfs_direct_IO to read and write part btrfs: remove BTRFS_INODE_READDIO_NEED_LOCK fs: remove dio_end_io() btrfs: switch to iomap_dio_rw() for dio iomap: remove lockdep_assert_held() iomap: add a filesystem hook for direct I/O bio submission fs: export generic_file_buffered_read() btrfs: turn space cache writeout failure messages into debug messages btrfs: include error on messages about failure to write space/inode caches btrfs: remove useless 'fail_unlock' label from btrfs_csum_file_blocks() btrfs: do not ignore error from btrfs_next_leaf() when inserting checksums btrfs: make checksum item extension more efficient btrfs: fix corrupt log due to concurrent fsync of inodes with shared extents btrfs: unexport btrfs_compress_set_level() btrfs: simplify iget helpers ...
2020-05-25btrfs: simplify iget helpersDavid Sterba1-6/+1
The inode lookup starting at btrfs_iget takes the full location key, while only the objectid is used to match the inode, because the lookup happens inside the given root thus the inode number is unique. The entire location key is properly set up in btrfs_init_locked_inode. Simplify the helpers and pass only inode number, renaming it to 'ino' instead of 'objectid'. This allows to remove temporary variables key, saving some stack space. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25btrfs: simplify root lookup by idDavid Sterba1-11/+4
The main function to lookup a root by its id btrfs_get_fs_root takes the whole key, while only using the objectid. The value of offset is preset to (u64)-1 but not actually used until btrfs_find_root that does the actual search. Switch btrfs_get_fs_root to use only objectid and remove all local variables that existed just for the lookup. The actual key for search is set up in btrfs_get_fs_root, reusing another key variable. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25btrfs: send: emit file capabilities after chownMarcos Paulo de Souza1-0/+67
Whenever a chown is executed, all capabilities of the file being touched are lost. When doing incremental send with a file with capabilities, there is a situation where the capability can be lost on the receiving side. The sequence of actions bellow shows the problem: $ mount /dev/sda fs1 $ mount /dev/sdb fs2 $ touch fs1/foo.bar $ setcap cap_sys_nice+ep fs1/foo.bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r fs1 fs1/snap_init $ btrfs send fs1/snap_init | btrfs receive fs2 $ chgrp adm fs1/foo.bar $ setcap cap_sys_nice+ep fs1/foo.bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r fs1 fs1/snap_complete $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r fs1 fs1/snap_incremental $ btrfs send fs1/snap_complete | btrfs receive fs2 $ btrfs send -p fs1/snap_init fs1/snap_incremental | btrfs receive fs2 At this point, only a chown was emitted by "btrfs send" since only the group was changed. This makes the cap_sys_nice capability to be dropped from fs2/snap_incremental/foo.bar To fix that, only emit capabilities after chown is emitted. The current code first checks for xattrs that are new/changed, emits them, and later emit the chown. Now, __process_new_xattr skips capabilities, letting only finish_inode_if_needed to emit them, if they exist, for the inode being processed. This behavior was being worked around in "btrfs receive" side by caching the capability and only applying it after chown. Now, xattrs are only emmited _after_ chown, making that workaround not needed anymore. Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/202 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Suggested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-09btrfs_ioctl_send(): don't bother with access_ok()Al Viro1-7/+0
we do copy_from_user() on that range anyway Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2020-03-23btrfs: kill the subvol_srcuJosef Bacik1-14/+0
Now that we have proper root ref counting everywhere we can kill the subvol_srcu. * removal of fs_info::subvol_srcu reduces size of fs_info by 1176 bytes * the refcount_t used for the references checks for accidental 0->1 in cases where the root lifetime would not be properly protected * there's a leak detector for roots to catch unfreed roots at umount time * SRCU served us well over the years but is was not a proper synchronization mechanism for some cases Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ update changelog ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: add helper to get the end offset of a file extent itemFilipe Manana1-41/+3
Getting the end offset for a file extent item requires a bit of code since the extent can be either inline or regular/prealloc. There are some places all over the code base that open code this logic and in another patch later in this series it will be needed again. Therefore encapsulate this logic in a helper function and use it. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: rename btrfs_put_fs_root and btrfs_grab_fs_rootJosef Bacik1-6/+6
We are now using these for all roots, rename them to btrfs_put_root() and btrfs_grab_root(); Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: push btrfs_grab_fs_root into btrfs_get_fs_rootJosef Bacik1-11/+0
Now that all callers of btrfs_get_fs_root are subsequently calling btrfs_grab_fs_root and handling dropping the ref when they are done appropriately, go ahead and push btrfs_grab_fs_root up into btrfs_get_fs_root. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: hold a ref on the root in btrfs_ioctl_sendJosef Bacik1-4/+24
We lookup all the clone roots and the parent root for send, so we need to hold refs on all of these roots while we're processing them. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: open code btrfs_read_fs_root_no_nameJosef Bacik1-2/+2
All this does is call btrfs_get_fs_root() with check_ref == true. Just use btrfs_get_fs_root() so we don't have a bunch of different helpers that do the same thing. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-01-31Btrfs: send, fix emission of invalid clone operations within the same fileFilipe Manana1-1/+2
When doing an incremental send and a file has extents shared with itself at different file offsets, it's possible for send to emit clone operations that will fail at the destination because the source range goes beyond the file's current size. This happens when the file size has increased in the send snapshot, there is a hole between the shared extents and both shared extents are at file offsets which are greater the file's size in the parent snapshot. Example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt/sdb $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xf1 0 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/base $ btrfs send -f /tmp/1.snap /mnt/sdb/base # Create a 320K extent at file offset 512K. $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xab 512K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcd 576K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xef 640K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x64 704K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x73 768K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar # Clone part of that 320K extent into a lower file offset (192K). # This file offset is greater than the file's size in the parent # snapshot (64K). Also the clone range is a bit behind the offset of # the 320K extent so that we leave a hole between the shared extents. $ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/sdb/foobar 448K 192K 192K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/incr $ btrfs send -p /mnt/sdb/base -f /tmp/2.snap /mnt/sdb/incr $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/1.snap /mnt/sdc $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/2.snap /mnt/sdc ERROR: failed to clone extents to foobar: Invalid argument The problem is that after processing the extent at file offset 256K, which refers to the first 128K of the 320K extent created by the buffered write operations, we have 'cur_inode_next_write_offset' set to 384K, which corresponds to the end offset of the partially shared extent (256K + 128K) and to the current file size in the receiver. Then when we process the extent at offset 512K, we do extent backreference iteration to figure out if we can clone the extent from some other inode or from the same inode, and we consider the extent at offset 256K of the same inode as a valid source for a clone operation, which is not correct because at that point the current file size in the receiver is 384K, which corresponds to the end of last processed extent (at file offset 256K), so using a clone source range from 256K to 256K + 320K is invalid because that goes past the current size of the file (384K) - this makes the receiver get an -EINVAL error when attempting the clone operation. So fix this by excluding clone sources that have a range that goes beyond the current file size in the receiver when iterating extent backreferences. A test case for fstests follows soon. Fixes: 11f2069c113e02 ("Btrfs: send, allow clone operations within the same file") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.5+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-12-13btrfs: send: remove WARN_ON for readonly mountAnand Jain1-6/+0
We log warning if root::orphan_cleanup_state is not set to ORPHAN_CLEANUP_DONE in btrfs_ioctl_send(). However if the filesystem is mounted as readonly we skip the orphan item cleanup during the lookup and root::orphan_cleanup_state remains at the init state 0 instead of ORPHAN_CLEANUP_DONE (2). So during send in btrfs_ioctl_send() we hit the warning as below. WARN_ON(send_root->orphan_cleanup_state != ORPHAN_CLEANUP_DONE); WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2616 at /Volumes/ws/btrfs-devel/fs/btrfs/send.c:7090 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xb2f/0x18c0 [btrfs] :: RIP: 0010:btrfs_ioctl_send+0xb2f/0x18c0 [btrfs] :: Call Trace: :: _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x7b/0x110 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x150a/0x2b00 [btrfs] :: do_vfs_ioctl+0xa9/0x620 ? __fget+0xac/0xe0 ksys_ioctl+0x60/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x49/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Reproducer: mkfs.btrfs -fq /dev/sdb mount /dev/sdb /btrfs btrfs subvolume create /btrfs/sv1 btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /btrfs/sv1 /btrfs/ss1 umount /btrfs mount -o ro /dev/sdb /btrfs btrfs send /btrfs/ss1 -f /tmp/f The warning exists because having orphan inodes could confuse send and cause it to fail or produce incorrect streams. The two cases that would cause such send failures, which are already fixed are: 1) Inodes that were unlinked - these are orphanized and remain with a link count of 0. These caused send operations to fail because it expected to always find at least one path for an inode. However this is no longer a problem since send is now able to deal with such inodes since commit 46b2f4590aab ("Btrfs: fix send failure when root has deleted files still open") and treats them as having been completely removed (the state after an orphan cleanup is performed). 2) Inodes that were in the process of being truncated. These resulted in send not knowing about the truncation and potentially issue write operations full of zeroes for the range from the new file size to the old file size. This is no longer a problem because we no longer create orphan items for truncation since commit f7e9e8fc792f ("Btrfs: stop creating orphan items for truncate"). As such before these commits, the WARN_ON here provided a clue in case something went wrong. Instead of being a warning against the root::orphan_cleanup_state value, it could have been more accurate by checking if there were actually any orphan items, and then issue a warning only if any exists, but that would be more expensive to check. Since orphanized inodes no longer cause problems for send, just remove the warning. Reported-by: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/21cb5e8d059f6e1496a903fa7bfc0a297e2f5370.camel@scientia.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Suggested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18Btrfs: send, skip backreference walking for extents with many referencesFilipe Manana1-1/+24
Backreference walking, which is used by send to figure if it can issue clone operations instead of write operations, can be very slow and use too much memory when extents have many references. This change simply skips backreference walking when an extent has more than 64 references, in which case we fallback to a write operation instead of a clone operation. This limit is conservative and in practice I observed no signicant slowdown with up to 100 references and still low memory usage up to that limit. This is a temporary workaround until there are speedups in the backref walking code, and as such it does not attempt to add extra interfaces or knobs to tweak the threshold. Reported-by: Atemu <atemu.main@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAE4GHgkvqVADtS4AzcQJxo0Q1jKQgKaW3JGp3SGdoinVo=C9eQ@mail.gmail.com/T/#me55dc0987f9cc2acaa54372ce0492c65782be3fa CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18Btrfs: send, allow clone operations within the same fileFilipe Manana1-5/+13
For send we currently skip clone operations when the source and destination files are the same. This is so because clone didn't support this case in its early days, but support for it was added back in May 2013 by commit a96fbc72884fcb ("Btrfs: allow file data clone within a file"). This change adds support for it. Example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt/sdd $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 64K 0 64K" /mnt/sdd/foobar $ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/sdd/foobar 0 64K 64K" /mnt/sdd/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdd /mnt/sdd/snap $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sde $ mount /dev/sde /mnt/sde $ btrfs send /mnt/sdd/snap | btrfs receive /mnt/sde Without this change file foobar at the destination has a single 128Kb extent: $ filefrag -v /mnt/sde/snap/foobar Filesystem type is: 9123683e File size of /mnt/sde/snap/foobar is 131072 (32 blocks of 4096 bytes) ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags: 0: 0.. 31: 0.. 31: 32: last,unknown_loc,delalloc,eof /mnt/sde/snap/foobar: 1 extent found With this we get a single 64Kb extent that is shared at file offsets 0 and 64K, just like in the source filesystem: $ filefrag -v /mnt/sde/snap/foobar Filesystem type is: 9123683e File size of /mnt/sde/snap/foobar is 131072 (32 blocks of 4096 bytes) ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags: 0: 0.. 15: 3328.. 3343: 16: shared 1: 16.. 31: 3328.. 3343: 16: 3344: last,shared,eof /mnt/sde/snap/foobar: 2 extents found Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18btrfs: drop unused parameter is_new from btrfs_igetDavid Sterba1-1/+1
The parameter is now always set to NULL and could be dropped. The last user was get_default_root but that got reworked in 05dbe6837b60 ("Btrfs: unify subvol= and subvolid= mounting") and the parameter became unused. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-08btrfs: silence maybe-uninitialized warning in clone_rangeAustin Kim1-1/+1
GCC throws warning message as below: ‘clone_src_i_size’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] #define IS_ALIGNED(x, a) (((x) & ((typeof(x))(a) - 1)) == 0) ^ fs/btrfs/send.c:5088:6: note: ‘clone_src_i_size’ was declared here u64 clone_src_i_size; ^ The clone_src_i_size is only used as call-by-reference in a call to get_inode_info(). Silence the warning by initializing clone_src_i_size to 0. Note that the warning is a false positive and reported by older versions of GCC (eg. 7.x) but not eg 9.x. As there have been numerous people, the patch is applied. Setting clone_src_i_size to 0 does not otherwise make sense and would not do any action in case the code changes in the future. Signed-off-by: Austin Kim <austindh.kim@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ add note ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-09-09btrfs: Relinquish CPUs in btrfs_compare_treesNikolay Borisov1-0/+1
When doing any form of incremental send the parent and the child trees need to be compared via btrfs_compare_trees. This can result in long loop chains without ever relinquishing the CPU. This causes softlockup detector to trigger when comparing trees with a lot of items. Example report: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 24s! [snapperd:16153] CPU: 0 PID: 16153 Comm: snapperd Not tainted 5.2.9-1-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased) Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO) pc : __ll_sc_arch_atomic_sub_return+0x14/0x20 lr : btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages+0xe0/0x1e8 [btrfs] sp : ffff00001273b7e0 Call trace: __ll_sc_arch_atomic_sub_return+0x14/0x20 release_extent_buffer+0xdc/0x120 [btrfs] free_extent_buffer.part.0+0xb0/0x118 [btrfs] free_extent_buffer+0x24/0x30 [btrfs] btrfs_release_path+0x4c/0xa0 [btrfs] btrfs_free_path.part.0+0x20/0x40 [btrfs] btrfs_free_path+0x24/0x30 [btrfs] get_inode_info+0xa8/0xf8 [btrfs] finish_inode_if_needed+0xe0/0x6d8 [btrfs] changed_cb+0x9c/0x410 [btrfs] btrfs_compare_trees+0x284/0x648 [btrfs] send_subvol+0x33c/0x520 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_send+0x8a0/0xaf0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x199c/0x2288 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x4b0/0x820 ksys_ioctl+0x84/0xb8 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0x38 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x7c/0x188 el0_svc_handler+0x34/0x90 el0_svc+0x8/0xc Fix this by adding a call to cond_resched at the beginning of the main loop in btrfs_compare_trees. Fixes: 7069830a9e38 ("Btrfs: add btrfs_compare_trees function") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-09-09btrfs: move functions for tree compare to send.cDavid Sterba1-0/+374
Send is the only user of tree_compare, we can move it there along with the other helpers and definitions. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-30Btrfs: fix incremental send failure after deduplicationFilipe Manana1-62/+15
When doing an incremental send operation we can fail if we previously did deduplication operations against a file that exists in both snapshots. In that case we will fail the send operation with -EIO and print a message to dmesg/syslog like the following: BTRFS error (device sdc): Send: inconsistent snapshot, found updated \ extent for inode 257 without updated inode item, send root is 258, \ parent root is 257 This requires that we deduplicate to the same file in both snapshots for the same amount of times on each snapshot. The issue happens because a deduplication only updates the iversion of an inode and does not update any other field of the inode, therefore if we deduplicate the file on each snapshot for the same amount of time, the inode will have the same iversion value (stored as the "sequence" field on the inode item) on both snapshots, therefore it will be seen as unchanged between in the send snapshot while there are new/updated/deleted extent items when comparing to the parent snapshot. This makes the send operation return -EIO and print an error message. Example reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt # Create our first file. The first half of the file has several 64Kb # extents while the second half as a single 512Kb extent. $ xfs_io -f -s -c "pwrite -S 0xb8 -b 64K 0 512K" /mnt/foo $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xb8 512K 512K" /mnt/foo # Create the base snapshot and the parent send stream from it. $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1 $ btrfs send -f /tmp/1.snap /mnt/mysnap1 # Create our second file, that has exactly the same data as the first # file. $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xb8 0 1M" /mnt/bar # Create the second snapshot, used for the incremental send, before # doing the file deduplication. $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2 # Now before creating the incremental send stream: # # 1) Deduplicate into a subrange of file foo in snapshot mysnap1. This # will drop several extent items and add a new one, also updating # the inode's iversion (sequence field in inode item) by 1, but not # any other field of the inode; # # 2) Deduplicate into a different subrange of file foo in snapshot # mysnap2. This will replace an extent item with a new one, also # updating the inode's iversion by 1 but not any other field of the # inode. # # After these two deduplication operations, the inode items, for file # foo, are identical in both snapshots, but we have different extent # items for this inode in both snapshots. We want to check this doesn't # cause send to fail with an error or produce an incorrect stream. $ xfs_io -r -c "dedupe /mnt/bar 0 0 512K" /mnt/mysnap1/foo $ xfs_io -r -c "dedupe /mnt/bar 512K 512K 512K" /mnt/mysnap2/foo # Create the incremental send stream. $ btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 -f /tmp/2.snap /mnt/mysnap2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -5: Input/output error This issue started happening back in 2015 when deduplication was updated to not update the inode's ctime and mtime and update only the iversion. Back then we would hit a BUG_ON() in send, but later in 2016 send was updated to return -EIO and print the error message instead of doing the BUG_ON(). A test case for fstests follows soon. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203933 Fixes: 1c919a5e13702c ("btrfs: don't update mtime/ctime on deduped inodes") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due to concurrent relocationFilipe Manana1-0/+14
Send always operates on read-only trees and always expected that while it is in progress, nothing changes in those trees. Due to that expectation and the fact that send is a read-only operation, it operates on commit roots and does not hold transaction handles. However relocation can COW nodes and leafs from read-only trees, which can cause unexpected failures and crashes (hitting BUG_ONs). while send using a node/leaf, it gets COWed, the transaction used to COW it is committed, a new transaction starts, the extent previously used for that node/leaf gets allocated, possibly for another tree, and the respective extent buffer' content changes while send is still using it. When this happens send normally fails with EIO being returned to user space and messages like the following are found in dmesg/syslog: [ 3408.699121] BTRFS error (device sdc): parent transid verify failed on 58703872 wanted 250 found 253 [ 3441.523123] BTRFS error (device sdc): did not find backref in send_root. inode=63211, offset=0, disk_byte=5222825984 found extent=5222825984 Other times, less often, we hit a BUG_ON() because an extent buffer that send is using used to be a node, and while send is still using it, it got COWed and got reused as a leaf while send is still using, producing the following trace: [ 3478.466280] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3478.466282] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1806! [ 3478.466965] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [ 3478.467635] CPU: 0 PID: 2165 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.0.0-btrfs-next-46 #1 [ 3478.468311] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626ccb91-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [ 3478.469681] RIP: 0010:read_node_slot+0x122/0x130 [btrfs] (...) [ 3478.471758] RSP: 0018:ffffa437826bfaa0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 3478.472457] RAX: ffff961416ed7000 RBX: 000000000000003d RCX: 0000000000000002 [ 3478.473151] RDX: 000000000000003d RSI: ffff96141e387408 RDI: ffff961599b30000 [ 3478.473837] RBP: ffffa437826bfb8e R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffa437826bfb8e [ 3478.474515] R10: ffffa437826bfa70 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9614385c8708 [ 3478.475186] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 3478.475840] FS: 00007f8e0e9cc8c0(0000) GS:ffff9615b6a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 3478.476489] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 3478.477127] CR2: 00007f98b67a056e CR3: 0000000005df6005 CR4: 00000000003606f0 [ 3478.477762] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 3478.478385] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 3478.479003] Call Trace: [ 3478.479600] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [ 3478.480202] tree_advance+0x173/0x1d0 [btrfs] [ 3478.480810] btrfs_compare_trees+0x30c/0x690 [btrfs] [ 3478.481388] ? process_extent+0x1280/0x1280 [btrfs] [ 3478.481954] btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1037/0x1270 [btrfs] [ 3478.482510] _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x80/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3478.483062] btrfs_ioctl+0x13fe/0x3120 [btrfs] [ 3478.483581] ? rq_clock_task+0x2e/0x60 [ 3478.484086] ? wake_up_new_task+0x1f3/0x370 [ 3478.484582] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [ 3478.485075] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs] [ 3478.485552] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [ 3478.486016] ? __fget+0x113/0x200 [ 3478.486467] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [ 3478.486911] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [ 3478.487337] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1b0 [ 3478.487751] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 3478.488159] RIP: 0033:0x7f8e0d7d4dd7 (...) [ 3478.489349] RSP: 002b:00007ffcf6fb4908 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ 3478.489742] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000105 RCX: 00007f8e0d7d4dd7 [ 3478.490142] RDX: 00007ffcf6fb4990 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000005 [ 3478.490548] RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 00007f8e0d6f3700 R09: 00007f8e0d6f3700 [ 3478.490953] R10: 00007f8e0d6f39d0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000005 [ 3478.491343] R13: 00005624e0780020 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 (...) [ 3478.493352] ---[ end trace d5f537302be4f8c8 ]--- Another possibility, much less likely to happen, is that send will not fail but the contents of the stream it produces may not be correct. To avoid this, do not allow send and relocation (balance) to run in parallel. In the long term the goal is to allow for both to be able to run concurrently without any problems, but that will take a significant effort in development and testing. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-01btrfs: resurrect btrfs_crc32c()Johannes Thumshirn1-1/+1
Commit 9678c54388b6 ("btrfs: Remove custom crc32c init code") removed the btrfs_crc32c() function, because it was a duplicate of the crc32c() library function we already have in the kernel. Resurrect it as a shim wrapper over crc32c() to make following transformations of the checksumming code in btrfs easier. Also provide a btrfs_crc32_final() to ease following transformations. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-05-28Btrfs: incremental send, fix emission of invalid clone operationsFilipe Manana1-3/+43
When doing an incremental send we can now issue clone operations with a source range that ends at the source's file eof and with a destination range that ends at an offset smaller then the destination's file eof. If the eof of the source file is not aligned to the sector size of the filesystem, the receiver will get a -EINVAL error when trying to do the operation or, on older kernels, silently corrupt the destination file. The corruption happens on kernels without commit ac765f83f1397646 ("Btrfs: fix data corruption due to cloning of eof block"), while the failure to clone happens on kernels with that commit. Example reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt/sdb $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xb1 0 2M" /mnt/sdb/foo $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xc7 0 2M" /mnt/sdb/bar $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0x4d 0 2M" /mnt/sdb/baz $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xe2 0 2M" /mnt/sdb/zoo $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/base $ btrfs send -f /tmp/base.send /mnt/sdb/base $ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/sdb/bar 1560K 500K 100K" /mnt/sdb/bar $ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/sdb/bar 1560K 0 100K" /mnt/sdb/zoo $ xfs_io -c "truncate 550K" /mnt/sdb/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/incr $ btrfs send -f /tmp/incr.send -p /mnt/sdb/base /mnt/sdb/incr $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/base.send /mnt/sdc $ btrfs receive -vv -f /tmp/incr.send /mnt/sdc (...) truncate bar size=563200 utimes bar clone zoo - source=bar source offset=512000 offset=0 length=51200 ERROR: failed to clone extents to zoo Invalid argument The failure happens because the clone source range ends at the eof of file bar, 563200, which is not aligned to the filesystems sector size (4Kb in this case), and the destination range ends at offset 0 + 51200, which is less then the size of the file zoo (2Mb). So fix this by detecting such case and instead of issuing a clone operation for the whole range, do a clone operation for smaller range that is sector size aligned followed by a write operation for the block containing the eof. Here we will always be pessimistic and assume the destination filesystem of the send stream has the largest possible sector size (64Kb), since we have no way of determining it. This fixes a recent regression introduced in kernel 5.2-rc1. Fixes: 040ee6120cb6706 ("Btrfs: send, improve clone range") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-05-28Btrfs: incremental send, fix file corruption when no-holes feature is enabledFilipe Manana1-0/+6
When using the no-holes feature, if we have a file with prealloc extents with a start offset beyond the file's eof, doing an incremental send can cause corruption of the file due to incorrect hole detection. Such case requires that the prealloc extent(s) exist in both the parent and send snapshots, and that a hole is punched into the file that covers all its extents that do not cross the eof boundary. Example reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f -O no-holes /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt/sdb $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 500K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ xfs_io -c "falloc -k 1200K 800K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/base $ btrfs send -f /tmp/base.snap /mnt/sdb/base $ xfs_io -c "fpunch 0 500K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/incr $ btrfs send -p /mnt/sdb/base -f /tmp/incr.snap /mnt/sdb/incr $ md5sum /mnt/sdb/incr/foobar 816df6f64deba63b029ca19d880ee10a /mnt/sdb/incr/foobar $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/base.snap /mnt/sdc $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/incr.snap /mnt/sdc $ md5sum /mnt/sdc/incr/foobar cf2ef71f4a9e90c2f6013ba3b2257ed2 /mnt/sdc/incr/foobar --> Different checksum, because the prealloc extent beyond the file's eof confused the hole detection code and it assumed a hole starting at offset 0 and ending at the offset of the prealloc extent (1200Kb) instead of ending at the offset 500Kb (the file's size). Fix this by ensuring we never cross the file's size when issuing the write operations for a hole. Fixes: 16e7549f045d33 ("Btrfs: incompatible format change to remove hole extents") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.14+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29Btrfs: fix race between send and deduplication that lead to failures and crashesFilipe Manana1-0/+26
Send operates on read only trees and expects them to never change while it is using them. This is part of its initial design, and this expection is due to two different reasons: 1) When it was introduced, no operations were allowed to modifiy read-only subvolumes/snapshots (including defrag for example). 2) It keeps send from having an impact on other filesystem operations. Namely send does not need to keep locks on the trees nor needs to hold on to transaction handles and delay transaction commits. This ends up being a consequence of the former reason. However the deduplication feature was introduced later (on September 2013, while send was introduced in July 2012) and it allowed for deduplication with destination files that belong to read-only trees (subvolumes and snapshots). That means that having a send operation (either full or incremental) running in parallel with a deduplication that has the destination inode in one of the trees used by the send operation, can result in tree nodes and leaves getting freed and reused while send is using them. This problem is similar to the problem solved for the root nodes getting freed and reused when a snapshot is made against one tree that is currenly being used by a send operation, fixed in commits [1] and [2]. These commits explain in detail how the problem happens and the explanation is valid for any node or leaf that is not the root of a tree as well. This problem was also discussed and explained recently in a thread [3]. The problem is very easy to reproduce when using send with large trees (snapshots) and just a few concurrent deduplication operations that target files in the trees used by send. A stress test case is being sent for fstests that triggers the issue easily. The most common error to hit is the send ioctl return -EIO with the following messages in dmesg/syslog: [1631617.204075] BTRFS error (device sdc): did not find backref in send_root. inode=63292, offset=0, disk_byte=5228134400 found extent=5228134400 [1631633.251754] BTRFS error (device sdc): parent transid verify failed on 32243712 wanted 24 found 27 The first one is very easy to hit while the second one happens much less frequently, except for very large trees (in that test case, snapshots with 100000 files having large xattrs to get deep and wide trees). Less frequently, at least one BUG_ON can be hit: [1631742.130080] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [1631742.130625] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1806! [1631742.131188] invalid opcode: 0000 [#6] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [1631742.131726] CPU: 1 PID: 13394 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G B D W 5.0.0-rc8-btrfs-next-45 #1 [1631742.132265] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626ccb91-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [1631742.133399] RIP: 0010:read_node_slot+0x122/0x130 [btrfs] (...) [1631742.135061] RSP: 0018:ffffb530021ebaa0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [1631742.135615] RAX: ffff93ac8912e000 RBX: 000000000000009d RCX: 0000000000000002 [1631742.136173] RDX: 000000000000009d RSI: ffff93ac564b0d08 RDI: ffff93ad5b48c000 [1631742.136759] RBP: ffffb530021ebb7d R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffb530021ebb7d [1631742.137324] R10: ffffb530021eba70 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff93ac87d0a708 [1631742.137900] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 [1631742.138455] FS: 00007f4cdb1528c0(0000) GS:ffff93ad76a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1631742.139010] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1631742.139568] CR2: 00007f5acb3d0420 CR3: 000000012be3e006 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [1631742.140131] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [1631742.140719] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [1631742.141272] Call Trace: [1631742.141826] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [1631742.142390] tree_advance+0x173/0x1d0 [btrfs] [1631742.142948] btrfs_compare_trees+0x268/0x690 [btrfs] [1631742.143533] ? process_extent+0x1070/0x1070 [btrfs] [1631742.144088] btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1037/0x1270 [btrfs] [1631742.144645] _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x80/0x110 [btrfs] [1631742.145161] ? trace_sched_stick_numa+0xe0/0xe0 [1631742.145685] btrfs_ioctl+0x13fe/0x3120 [btrfs] [1631742.146179] ? account_entity_enqueue+0xd3/0x100 [1631742.146662] ? reweight_entity+0x154/0x1a0 [1631742.147135] ? update_curr+0x20/0x2a0 [1631742.147593] ? check_preempt_wakeup+0x103/0x250 [1631742.148053] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [1631742.148510] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs] [1631742.148942] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [1631742.149361] ? __fget+0x113/0x200 [1631742.149767] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [1631742.150159] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [1631742.150543] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1b0 [1631742.150931] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [1631742.151326] RIP: 0033:0x7f4cd9f5add7 (...) [1631742.152509] RSP: 002b:00007ffe91017708 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [1631742.152892] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000105 RCX: 00007f4cd9f5add7 [1631742.153268] RDX: 00007ffe91017790 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000007 [1631742.153633] RBP: 0000000000000007 R08: 00007f4cd9e79700 R09: 00007f4cd9e79700 [1631742.153999] R10: 00007f4cd9e799d0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [1631742.154365] R13: 0000555dfae53020 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 (...) [1631742.156696] ---[ end trace 5dac9f96dcc3fd6b ]--- That BUG_ON happens because while send is using a node, that node is COWed by a concurrent deduplication, gets freed and gets reused as a leaf (because a transaction commit happened in between), so when it attempts to read a slot from the extent buffer, at ctree.c:read_node_slot(), the extent buffer contents were wiped out and it now matches a leaf (which can even belong to some other tree now), hitting the BUG_ON(level == 0). Fix this concurrency issue by not allowing send and deduplication to run in parallel if both operate on the same readonly trees, returning EAGAIN to user space and logging an exlicit warning in dmesg/syslog. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=be6821f82c3cc36e026f5afd10249988852b35ea [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6f2f0b394b54e2b159ef969a0b5274e9bbf82ff2 [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAL3q7H7iqSEEyFaEtpRZw3cp613y+4k2Q8b4W7mweR3tZA05bQ@mail.gmail.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29Btrfs: send, flush dellaloc in order to avoid data lossFilipe Manana1-0/+36
When we set a subvolume to read-only mode we do not flush dellaloc for any of its inodes (except if the filesystem is mounted with -o flushoncommit), since it does not affect correctness for any subsequent operations - except for a future send operation. The send operation will not be able to see the delalloc data since the respective file extent items, inode item updates, backreferences, etc, have not hit yet the subvolume and extent trees. Effectively this means data loss, since the send stream will not contain any data from existing delalloc. Another problem from this is that if the writeback starts and finishes while the send operation is in progress, we have the subvolume tree being being modified concurrently which can result in send failing unexpectedly with EIO or hitting runtime errors, assertion failures or hitting BUG_ONs, etc. Simple reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xea 0 108K" /mnt/sv/foo $ btrfs property set /mnt/sv ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/send.stream /mnt/sv $ od -t x1 -A d /mnt/sv/foo 0000000 ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea * 0110592 $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/send.stream /mnt $ echo $? 0 $ od -t x1 -A d /mnt/sv/foo 0000000 # ---> empty file Since this a problem that affects send only, fix it in send by flushing dellaloc for all the roots used by the send operation before send starts to process the commit roots. This is a problem that affects send since it was introduced (commit 31db9f7c23fbf7 ("Btrfs: introduce BTRFS_IOC_SEND for btrfs send/receive")) but backporting it to older kernels has some dependencies: - For kernels between 3.19 and 4.20, it depends on commit 3cd24c698004d2 ("btrfs: use tagged writepage to mitigate livelock of snapshot") because the function btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot() does not exist before that commit. So one has to either pick that commit or replace the calls to btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot() in this patch with calls to btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes(). - For kernels older than 3.19 it also requires commit e5fa8f865b3324 ("Btrfs: ensure send always works on roots without orphans") because it depends on the function ensure_commit_roots_uptodate() which that commits introduced. - No dependencies for 5.0+ kernels. A test case for fstests follows soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29Btrfs: send, improve clone rangeRobbie Ko1-19/+33
Improve clone_range in two scenarios. 1. Remove the limit of inode size when find clone inodes We can do partial clone, so there is no need to limit the size of the candidate inode. When clone a range, we clone the legal range only by bytenr, offset, len, inode size. 2. In the scenarios of rewrite or clone_range, data_offset rarely matches exactly, so the chance of a clone is missed. e.g. 1. Write a 1M file dd if=/dev/zero of=1M bs=1M count=1 2. Clone 1M file cp --reflink 1M clone 3. Rewrite 4k on the clone file dd if=/dev/zero of=clone bs=4k count=1 conv=notrunc The disk layout is as follows: item 16 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15353 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 1103101952 nr 1048576 extent data offset 0 nr 1048576 ram 1048576 extent compression(none) ... item 22 key (258 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 14959 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 1104150528 nr 4096 extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 4096 extent compression(none) item 23 key (258 EXTENT_DATA 4096) itemoff 14906 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 1103101952 nr 1048576 extent data offset 4096 nr 1044480 ram 1048576 extent compression(none) When send, inode 258 file offset 4096~1048576 (item 23) has a chance to clone_range, but because data_offset does not match inode 257 (item 16), it causes missed clone and can only transfer actual data. Improve the problem by judging whether the current data_offset has overlap with the file extent item, and if so, adjusting offset and extent_len so that we can clone correctly. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-01-03Remove 'type' argument from access_ok() functionLinus Torvalds1-1/+1
Nobody has actually used the type (VERIFY_READ vs VERIFY_WRITE) argument of the user address range verification function since we got rid of the old racy i386-only code to walk page tables by hand. It existed because the original 80386 would not honor the write protect bit when in kernel mode, so you had to do COW by hand before doing any user access. But we haven't supported that in a long time, and these days the 'type' argument is a purely historical artifact. A discussion about extending 'user_access_begin()' to do the range checking resulted this patch, because there is no way we're going to move the old VERIFY_xyz interface to that model. And it's best done at the end of the merge window when I've done most of my merges, so let's just get this done once and for all. This patch was mostly done with a sed-script, with manual fix-ups for the cases that weren't of the trivial 'access_ok(VERIFY_xyz' form. There were a couple of notable cases: - csky still had the old "verify_area()" name as an alias. - the iter_iov code had magical hardcoded knowledge of the actual values of VERIFY_{READ,WRITE} (not that they mattered, since nothing really used it) - microblaze used the type argument for a debug printout but other than those oddities this should be a total no-op patch. I tried to fix up all architectures, did fairly extensive grepping for access_ok() uses, and the changes are trivial, but I may have missed something. Any missed conversion should be trivially fixable, though. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-12-17btrfs: Fix typos in comments and stringsAndrea Gelmini1-2/+2
The typos accumulate over time so once in a while time they get fixed in a large patch. Signed-off-by: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@gelma.net> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17btrfs: use offset_in_page instead of open-coding itJohannes Thumshirn1-1/+1
Constructs like 'var & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)' or 'var & ~PAGE_MASK' can denote an offset into a page. So replace them by the offset_in_page() macro instead of open-coding it if they're not used as an alignment check. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-11-21Btrfs: send, fix infinite loop due to directory rename dependenciesRobbie Ko1-3/+8
When doing an incremental send, due to the need of delaying directory move (rename) operations we can end up in infinite loop at apply_children_dir_moves(). An example scenario that triggers this problem is described below, where directory names correspond to the numbers of their respective inodes. Parent snapshot: . |--- 261/ |--- 271/ |--- 266/ |--- 259/ |--- 260/ | |--- 267 | |--- 264/ | |--- 258/ | |--- 257/ | |--- 265/ |--- 268/ |--- 269/ | |--- 262/ | |--- 270/ |--- 272/ | |--- 263/ | |--- 275/ | |--- 274/ |--- 273/ Send snapshot: . |-- 275/ |-- 274/ |-- 273/ |-- 262/ |-- 269/ |-- 258/ |-- 271/ |-- 268/ |-- 267/ |-- 270/ |-- 259/ | |-- 265/ | |-- 272/ |-- 257/ |-- 260/ |-- 264/ |-- 263/ |-- 261/ |-- 266/ When processing inode 257 we delay its move (rename) operation because its new parent in the send snapshot, inode 272, was not yet processed. Then when processing inode 272, we delay the move operation for that inode because inode 274 is its ancestor in the send snapshot. Finally we delay the move operation for inode 274 when processing it because inode 275 is its new parent in the send snapshot and was not yet moved. When finishing processing inode 275, we start to do the move operations that were previously delayed (at apply_children_dir_moves()), resulting in the following iterations: 1) We issue the move operation for inode 274; 2) Because inode 262 depended on the move operation of inode 274 (it was delayed because 274 is its ancestor in the send snapshot), we issue the move operation for inode 262; 3) We issue the move operation for inode 272, because it was delayed by inode 274 too (ancestor of 272 in the send snapshot); 4) We issue the move operation for inode 269 (it was delayed by 262); 5) We issue the move operation for inode 257 (it was delayed by 272); 6) We issue the move operation for inode 260 (it was delayed by 272); 7) We issue the move operation for inode 258 (it was delayed by 269); 8) We issue the move operation for inode 264 (it was delayed by 257); 9) We issue the move operation for inode 271 (it was delayed by 258); 10) We issue the move operation for inode 263 (it was delayed by 264); 11) We issue the move operation for inode 268 (it was delayed by 271); 12) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 270 (it was delayed by 271). We detect a path loop in the current state, because inode 267 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move operation for inode 270. So we delay again the move operation for inode 270, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 267 is moved; 13) We issue the move operation for inode 261 (it was delayed by 263); 14) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 266 (it was delayed by 263). We detect a path loop in the current state, because inode 270 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move operation for inode 266. So we delay again the move operation for inode 266, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 270 is moved (its move operation was delayed in step 12); 15) We issue the move operation for inode 267 (it was delayed by 268); 16) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 266 (it was delayed by 270). We detect a path loop in the current state, because inode 270 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move operation for inode 266. So we delay again the move operation for inode 266, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 270 is moved (its move operation was delayed in step 12). So here we added again the same delayed move operation that we added in step 14; 17) We attempt again to see if we can issue the move operation for inode 266, and as in step 16, we realize we can not due to a path loop in the current state due to a dependency on inode 270. Again we delay inode's 266 rename to happen after inode's 270 move operation, adding the same dependency to the empty stack that we did in steps 14 and 16. The next iteration will pick the same move dependency on the stack (the only entry) and realize again there is still a path loop and then again the same dependency to the stack, over and over, resulting in an infinite loop. So fix this by preventing adding the same move dependency entries to the stack by removing each pending move record from the red black tree of pending moves. This way the next call to get_pending_dir_moves() will not return anything for the current parent inode. A test case for fstests, with this reproducer, follows soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Wrote changelog with example and more clear explanation] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-10-15Btrfs: unify error handling of btrfs_lookup_dir_itemLiu Bo1-6/+2
Unify the error handling of directory item lookups using IS_ERR_OR_NULL. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-10-15btrfs: Remove 'objectid' member from struct btrfs_rootMisono Tomohiro1-8/+8
There are two members in struct btrfs_root which indicate root's objectid: objectid and root_key.objectid. They are both set to the same value in __setup_root(): static void __setup_root(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 objectid) { ... root->objectid = objectid; ... root->root_key.objectid = objecitd; ... } and not changed to other value after initialization. grep in btrfs directory shows both are used in many places: $ grep -rI "root->root_key.objectid" | wc -l 133 $ grep -rI "root->objectid" | wc -l 55 (4.17, inc. some noise) It is confusing to have two similar variable names and it seems that there is no rule about which should be used in a certain case. Since ->root_key itself is needed for tree reloc tree, let's remove 'objecitd' member and unify code to use ->root_key.objectid in all places. Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06Btrfs: send, fix incorrect file layout after hole punching beyond eofFilipe Manana1-0/+9
When doing an incremental send, if we have a file in the parent snapshot that has prealloc extents beyond EOF and in the send snapshot it got a hole punch that partially covers the prealloc extents, the send stream, when replayed by a receiver, can result in a file that has a size bigger than it should and filled with zeroes past the correct EOF. For example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ xfs_io -f -c "falloc -k 0 4M" /mnt/foobar $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xea 0 1M" /mnt/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send -f /tmp/1.send /mnt/snap1 $ xfs_io -c "fpunch 1M 2M" /mnt/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -f /tmp/2.send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 $ stat --format %s /mnt/snap2/foobar 1048576 $ md5sum /mnt/snap2/foobar d31659e82e87798acd4669a1e0a19d4f /mnt/snap2/foobar $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ btrfs receive -f /mnt/1.snap /mnt $ btrfs receive -f /mnt/2.snap /mnt $ stat --format %s /mnt/snap2/foobar 3145728 # --> should be 1Mb and not 3Mb (which was the end offset of hole # punch operation) $ md5sum /mnt/snap2/foobar 117baf295297c2a995f92da725b0b651 /mnt/snap2/foobar # --> should be d31659e82e87798acd4669a1e0a19d4f as in the original fs This issue actually happens only since commit ffa7c4296e93 ("Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations"), but before that commit we were issuing a write operation full of zeroes (to "punch" a hole) which was extending the file size beyond the correct value and then immediately issue a truncate operation to the correct size and undoing the previous write operation. Since the send protocol does not support fallocate, for extent preallocation and hole punching, fix this by not even attempting to send a "hole" (regular write full of zeroes) if it starts at an offset greater then or equals to the file's size. This approach, besides being much more simple then making send issue the truncate operation, adds the benefit of avoiding the useless pair of write of zeroes and truncate operations, saving time and IO at the receiver and reducing the size of the send stream. A test case for fstests follows soon. Fixes: ffa7c4296e93 ("Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.17+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06Btrfs: fix send failure when root has deleted files still openFilipe Manana1-8/+129
The more common use case of send involves creating a RO snapshot and then use it for a send operation. In this case it's not possible to have inodes in the snapshot that have a link count of zero (inode with an orphan item) since during snapshot creation we do the orphan cleanup. However, other less common use cases for send can end up seeing inodes with a link count of zero and in this case the send operation fails with a ENOENT error because any attempt to generate a path for the inode, with the purpose of creating it or updating it at the receiver, fails since there are no inode reference items. One use case it to use a regular subvolume for a send operation after turning it to RO mode or turning a RW snapshot into RO mode and then using it for a send operation. In both cases, if a file gets all its hard links deleted while there is an open file descriptor before turning the subvolume/snapshot into RO mode, the send operation will encounter an inode with a link count of zero and then fail with errno ENOENT. Example using a full send with a subvolume: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1 $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar # keep an open file descriptor on file bar $ exec 73</mnt/sv1/bar $ unlink /mnt/sv1/bar # Turn the subvolume to RO mode and use it for a full send, while # holding the open file descriptor. $ btrfs property set /mnt/sv1 ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/full.send /mnt/sv1 At subvol /mnt/sv1 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory Example using an incremental send with snapshots: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1 $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap1 $ echo "hello world" >> /mnt/sv1/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap2 # Turn the second snapshot to RW mode and delete file foo while # holding an open file descriptor on it. $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro false $ exec 73</mnt/snap2/foo $ unlink /mnt/snap2/foo # Set the second snapshot back to RO mode and do an incremental send. $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/inc.send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 At subvol /mnt/snap2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory So fix this by ignoring inodes with a link count of zero if we are either doing a full send or if they do not exist in the parent snapshot (they are new in the send snapshot), and unlink all paths found in the parent snapshot when doing an incremental send (and ignoring all other inode items, such as xattrs and extents). A test case for fstests follows soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reported-by: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06Btrfs: remove unused key assignment when doing a full sendFilipe Manana1-7/+2
At send.c:full_send_tree() we were setting the 'key' variable in the loop while never using it later. We were also using two btrfs_key variables to store the initial key for search and the key found in every iteration of the loop. So remove this useless key assignment and use the same btrfs_key variable to store the initial search key and the key found in each iteration. This was introduced in the initial send commit but was never used (commit 31db9f7c23fb ("Btrfs: introduce BTRFS_IOC_SEND for btrfs send/receive"). Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: Get rid of the confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_lenQu Wenruo1-10/+7
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed data size of an inlined extent. However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item. While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely. In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug. Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len(). Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-05-28btrfs: incremental send, improve rmdir performance for large directoryRobbie Ko1-9/+22
Currently when checking if a directory can be deleted, we always check if all its children have been processed. Example: A directory with 2,000,000 files was deleted original: 1994m57.071s patch: 1m38.554s [FIX] Instead of checking all children on all calls to can_rmdir(), we keep track of the directory index offset of the child last checked in the last call to can_rmdir(), and then use it as the starting point for future calls to can_rmdir(). Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [ update changelog ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-05-28btrfs: incremental send, move allocation until it's needed in orphan_dir_infoRobbie Ko1-7/+6
Move the allocation after the search when it's clear that the new entry will be added. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [ update changelog ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-05-28btrfs: send: fix spelling mistake: "send_in_progres" -> "send_in_progress"Colin Ian King1-1/+1
Trivial fix to spelling mistake of function name in btrfs_err message Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-05-02Btrfs: send, fix missing truncate for inode with prealloc extent past eofFilipe Manana1-0/+4
An incremental send operation can miss a truncate operation when an inode has an increased size in the send snapshot and a prealloc extent beyond its size. Consider the following scenario where a necessary truncate operation is missing in the incremental send stream: 1) In the parent snapshot an inode has a size of 1282957 bytes and it has no prealloc extents beyond its size; 2) In the the send snapshot it has a size of 5738496 bytes and has a new extent at offsets 1884160 (length of 106496 bytes) and a prealloc extent beyond eof at offset 6729728 (and a length of 339968 bytes); 3) When processing the prealloc extent, at offset 6729728, we end up at send.c:send_write_or_clone() and set the @len variable to a value of 18446744073708560384 because @offset plus the original @len value is larger then the inode's size (6729728 + 339968 > 5738496). We then call send_extent_data(), with that @offset and @len, which in turn calls send_write(), and then the later calls fill_read_buf(). Because the offset passed to fill_read_buf() is greater then inode's i_size, this function returns 0 immediately, which makes send_write() and send_extent_data() do nothing and return immediately as well. When we get back to send.c:send_write_or_clone() we adjust the value of sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset to @offset plus @len, which corresponds to 6729728 + 18446744073708560384 = 5738496, which is precisely the the size of the inode in the send snapshot; 4) Later when at send.c:finish_inode_if_needed() we determine that we don't need to issue a truncate operation because the value of sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset corresponds to the inode's new size, 5738496 bytes. This is wrong because the last write operation that was issued started at offset 1884160 with a length of 106496 bytes, so the correct value for sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset should be 1990656 (1884160 + 106496), so that a truncate operation with a value of 5738496 bytes would have been sent to insert a trailing hole at the destination. So fix the issue by making send.c:send_write_or_clone() not attempt to send write or clone operations for extents that start beyond the inode's size, since such attempts do nothing but waste time by calling helper functions and allocating path structures, and send currently has no fallocate command in order to create prealloc extents at the destination (either beyond a file's eof or not). The issue was found running the test btrfs/007 from fstests using a seed value of 1524346151 for fsstress. Reported-by: Gu, Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com> Fixes: ffa7c4296e93 ("Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-04-12btrfs: replace GPL boilerplate by SPDX -- sourcesDavid Sterba1-14/+1
Remove GPL boilerplate text (long, short, one-line) and keep the rest, ie. personal, company or original source copyright statements. Add the SPDX header. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-26Btrfs: send: fix typo in TLV_PUTLiu Bo1-2/+2
According to tlv_put()'s prototype, data and attrlen needs to be exchanged in the macro, but seems all callers are already aware of this misorder and are therefore not affected. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-26Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operationsFilipe Manana1-5/+21
When send finishes processing an inode representing a regular file, it always issues a truncate operation for that file, even if its size did not change or the last write sets the file size correctly. In the most common cases, the issued write operations set the file to correct size (either full or incremental sends) or the file size did not change (for incremental sends), so the only case where a truncate operation is needed is when a file size becomes smaller in the send snapshot when compared to the parent snapshot. By not issuing unnecessary truncate operations we reduce the stream size and save time in the receiver. Currently truncating a file to the same size triggers writeback of its last page (if it's dirty) and waits for it to complete (only if the file size is not aligned with the filesystem's sector size). This is being fixed by another patch and is independent of this change (that patch's title is "Btrfs: skip writeback of last page when truncating file to same size"). The following script was used to measure time spent by a receiver without this change applied, with this change applied, and without this change and with the truncate fix applied (the fix to not make it start and wait for writeback to complete). $ cat test_send.sh #!/bin/bash SRC_DEV=/dev/sdc DST_DEV=/dev/sdd SRC_MNT=/mnt/sdc DST_MNT=/mnt/sdd mkfs.btrfs -f $SRC_DEV >/dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $DST_DEV >/dev/null mount $SRC_DEV $SRC_MNT mount $DST_DEV $DST_MNT echo "Creating source filesystem" for ((t = 0; t < 10; t++)); do ( for ((i = 1; i <= 20000; i++)); do xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 5000" \ $SRC_MNT/file_$i > /dev/null done ) & worker_pids[$t]=$! done wait ${worker_pids[@]} echo "Creating and sending snapshot" btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $SRC_MNT $SRC_MNT/snap1 >/dev/null /usr/bin/time -f "send took %e seconds" \ btrfs send -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $SRC_MNT/snap1 /usr/bin/time -f "receive took %e seconds" \ btrfs receive -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $DST_MNT umount $SRC_MNT umount $DST_MNT The results, which are averages for 5 runs for each case, were the following: * Without this change average receive time was 26.49 seconds standard deviation of 2.53 seconds * Without this change and with the truncate fix average receive time was 12.51 seconds standard deviation of 0.32 seconds * With this change and without the truncate fix average receive time was 10.02 seconds standard deviation of 1.11 seconds Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-26btrfs: add more __cold annotationsDavid Sterba1-0/+1
The __cold functions are placed to a special section, as they're expected to be called rarely. This could help i-cache prefetches or help compiler to decide which branches are more/less likely to be taken without any other annotations needed. Though we can't add more __exit annotations, it's still possible to add __cold (that's also added with __exit). That way the following function categories are tagged: - printf wrappers, error messages - exit helpers Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-26btrfs: Remove custom crc32c init codeNikolay Borisov1-2/+2
The custom crc32 init code was introduced in 14a958e678cd ("Btrfs: fix btrfs boot when compiled as built-in") to enable using btrfs as a built-in. However, later as pointed out by 60efa5eb2e88 ("Btrfs: use late_initcall instead of module_init") this wasn't enough and finally btrfs was switched to late_initcall which comes after the generic crc32c implementation is initiliased. The latter commit superseeded the former. Now that we don't have to maintain our own code let's just remove it and switch to using the generic implementation. Despite touching a lot of files the patch is really simple. Here is the gist of the changes: 1. Select LIBCRC32C rather than the low-level modules. 2. s/btrfs_crc32c/crc32c/g 3. replace hash.h with linux/crc32c.h 4. Move the btrfs namehash funcs to ctree.h and change the tree accordingly. I've tested this with btrfs being both a module and a built-in and xfstest doesn't complain. Does seem to fix the longstanding problem of not automatically selectiong the crc32c module when btrfs is used. Possibly there is a workaround in dracut. The modinfo confirms that now all the module dependencies are there: before: depends: zstd_compress,zstd_decompress,raid6_pq,xor,zlib_deflate after: depends: libcrc32c,zstd_compress,zstd_decompress,raid6_pq,xor,zlib_deflate Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ add more info to changelog from mails ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-01Btrfs: send, fix issuing write op when processing hole in no data modeFilipe Manana1-0/+3
When doing an incremental send of a filesystem with the no-holes feature enabled, we end up issuing a write operation when using the no data mode send flag, instead of issuing an update extent operation. Fix this by issuing the update extent operation instead. Trivial reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f -O no-holes /dev/sdc $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt/sdd $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 32K" /mnt/sdc/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdc /mnt/sdc/snap1 $ xfs_io -c "fpunch 8K 8K" /mnt/sdc/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdc /mnt/sdc/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/sdc/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt/sdd $ btrfs send --no-data -p /mnt/sdc/snap1 /mnt/sdc/snap2 \ | btrfs receive -vv /mnt/sdd Before this change the output of the second receive command is: receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=f6922049-8c22-e544-9ff9-fc6755918447... utimes write foobar, offset 8192, len 8192 utimes foobar BTRFS_IOC_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL uuid=f6922049-8c22-e544-9ff9-... After this change it is: receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=564d36a3-ebc8-7343-aec9-bf6fda278e64... utimes update_extent foobar: offset=8192, len=8192 utimes foobar BTRFS_IOC_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL uuid=564d36a3-ebc8-7343-aec9-bf6fda278e64... Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-01-22btrfs: Cleanup existing name_len checksQu Wenruo1-6/+0
Since tree-checker has verified leaf when reading from disk, we don't need the existing verify_dir_item() or btrfs_is_name_len_valid() checks. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-11-28Btrfs: incremental send, fix wrong unlink path after renaming fileFilipe Manana1-18/+106
Under some circumstances, an incremental send operation can issue wrong paths for unlink commands related to files that have multiple hard links and some (or all) of those links were renamed between the parent and send snapshots. Consider the following example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- b/ (ino 259) | | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | | | |---- f2l1 (ino 261) | |---- d/ (ino 262) |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) |---- f2l2 (ino 261) |---- f1_2 (ino 258) Send snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- f2l1/ (ino 263) | |---- b2/ (ino 259) | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- d3 (ino 262) | | |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) | | |---- f2l2_2 (ino 261) | | |---- f1_2 (ino 258) | | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | |---- f1l2 (ino 258) | |---- d (ino 261) When computing the incremental send stream the following steps happen: 1) When processing inode 261, a rename operation is issued that renames inode 262, which currently as a path of "d", to an orphan name of "o262-7-0". This is done because in the send snapshot, inode 261 has of its hard links with a path of "d" as well. 2) Two link operations are issued that create the new hard links for inode 261, whose names are "d" and "f2l2_2", at paths "/" and "o262-7-0/" respectively. 3) Still while processing inode 261, unlink operations are issued to remove the old hard links of inode 261, with names "f2l1" and "f2l2", at paths "a/" and "d/". However path "d/" does not correspond anymore to the directory inode 262 but corresponds instead to a hard link of inode 261 (link command issued in the previous step). This makes the receiver fail with a ENOTDIR error when attempting the unlink operation. The problem happens because before sending the unlink operation, we failed to detect that inode 262 was one of ancestors for inode 261 in the parent snapshot, and therefore we didn't recompute the path for inode 262 before issuing the unlink operation for the link named "f2l2" of inode 262. The detection failed because the function "is_ancestor()" only follows the first hard link it finds for an inode instead of all of its hard links (as it was originally created for being used with directories only, for which only one hard link exists). So fix this by making "is_ancestor()" follow all hard links of the input inode. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-11-01btrfs: add a flag to iterate_inodes_from_logical to find all extent refs for uncompressed extentsZygo Blaxell1-1/+1
The LOGICAL_INO ioctl provides a backward mapping from extent bytenr and offset (encoded as a single logical address) to a list of extent refs. LOGICAL_INO complements TREE_SEARCH, which provides the forward mapping (extent ref -> extent bytenr and offset, or logical address). These are useful capabilities for programs that manipulate extents and extent references from userspace (e.g. dedup and defrag utilities). When the extents are uncompressed (and not encrypted and not other), check_extent_in_eb performs filtering of the extent refs to remove any extent refs which do not contain the same extent offset as the 'logical' parameter's extent offset. This prevents LOGICAL_INO from returning references to more than a single block. To find the set of extent references to an uncompressed extent from [a, b), userspace has to run a loop like this pseudocode: for (i = a; i < b; ++i) extent_ref_set += LOGICAL_INO(i); At each iteration of the loop (up to 32768 iterations for a 128M extent), data we are interested in is collected in the kernel, then deleted by the filter in check_extent_in_eb. When the extents are compressed (or encrypted or other), the 'logical' parameter must be an extent bytenr (the 'a' parameter in the loop). No filtering by extent offset is done (or possible?) so the result is the complete set of extent refs for the entire extent. This removes the need for the loop, since we get all the extent refs in one call. Add an 'ignore_offset' argument to iterate_inodes_from_logical, [...several levels of function call graph...], and check_extent_in_eb, so that we can disable the extent offset filtering for uncompressed extents. This flag can be set by an improved version of the LOGICAL_INO ioctl to get either behavior as desired. There is no functional change in this patch. The new flag is always false. Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ minor coding style fixes ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Copyright © 1996 – 2023 Jason A. Donenfeld. All Rights Reverse Engineered.