aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstatshomepage
path: root/tools/perf/scripts/python/export-to-postgresql.py (unfollow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-05-09pwm: meson: Use the spin-lock only to protect register modificationsMartin Blumenstingl1-8/+17
Holding the spin-lock for all of the code in meson_pwm_apply() can result in a "BUG: scheduling while atomic". This can happen because clk_get_rate() (which is called from meson_pwm_calc()) may sleep. Only hold the spin-lock when modifying registers to solve this. The reason why we need a spin-lock in the driver is because the REG_MISC_AB register is shared between the two channels provided by one PWM controller. The only functions where REG_MISC_AB is modified are meson_pwm_enable() and meson_pwm_disable() so the register reads/writes in there need to be protected by the spin-lock. The original code also used the spin-lock to protect the values in struct meson_pwm_channel. This could be necessary if two consumers can use the same PWM channel. However, PWM core doesn't allow this so we don't need to protect the values in struct meson_pwm_channel with a lock. Fixes: 211ed630753d2f ("pwm: Add support for Meson PWM Controller") Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-05-09pwm: meson: Don't disable PWM when setting duty repeatedlyBichao Zheng1-5/+0
There is an abnormally low about 20ms,when setting duty repeatedly. Because setting the duty will disable PWM and then enable. Delete this operation now. Fixes: 211ed630753d2f ("pwm: Add support for Meson PWM Controller") Signed-off-by: Bichao Zheng <bichao.zheng@amlogic.com> [ Dropped code instead of hiding it behind a comment ] Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-05-09pwm: meson: Consider 128 a valid pre-dividerMartin Blumenstingl1-2/+2
The pre-divider allows configuring longer PWM periods compared to using the input clock directly. The pre-divider is 7 bit wide, meaning it's maximum value is 128 (the register value is off-by-one: 0x7f or 127). Change the loop to also allow for the maximum possible value to be considered valid. Fixes: 211ed630753d2f ("pwm: Add support for Meson PWM Controller") Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-03-20pwm: sysfs: fix typo "its" -> "it's"Uwe Kleine-König1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-03-20pwm: tiehrpwm: Enable compilation for ARCH_K3Vignesh Raghavendra1-3/+2
K3 devices have the same EHRPWM IP as OMAP SoCs. Enable the driver to be built for K3 devices. Also, drop reference to AM33xx in help text, as IP is found on multiple TI SoCs. Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-03-20dt-bindings: pwm: tiehrpwm: Add TI AM654 SoC specific compatibleVignesh Raghavendra1-0/+1
Add a new compatible string "ti,am654-ehrpwm" to support EHRPWM IP on TI AM654 SoC. Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-03-20pwm: tiehrpwm: Update shadow register for disabling PWMsChristoph Vogtländer1-0/+2
It must be made sure that immediate mode is not already set, when modifying shadow register value in ehrpwm_pwm_disable(). Otherwise modifications to the action-qualifier continuous S/W force register(AQSFRC) will be done in the active register. This may happen when both channels are being disabled. In this case, only the first channel state will be recorded as disabled in the shadow register. Later, when enabling the first channel again, the second channel would be enabled as well. Setting RLDCSF to zero, first, ensures that the shadow register is updated as desired. Fixes: 38dabd91ff0b ("pwm: tiehrpwm: Fix disabling of output of PWMs") Signed-off-by: Christoph Vogtländer <c.vogtlaender@sigma-surface-science.com> [vigneshr@ti.com: Improve commit message] Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-03-20pwm: img: Turn final 'else if' into 'else' in img_pwm_configNathan Chancellor1-1/+1
When building with -Wsometimes-uninitialized, Clang warns: drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c:126:13: error: variable 'timebase' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized] The final else if functions as an else; make that explicit so that Clang understands that timebase cannot be used uninitialized. Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/400 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-03-20pwm: Fix deadlock warning when removing PWM devicePhong Hoang3-23/+6
This patch fixes deadlock warning if removing PWM device when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled. This issue can be reproceduced by the following steps on the R-Car H3 Salvator-X board if the backlight is disabled: # cd /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0 # echo 0 > export # ls device export npwm power pwm0 subsystem uevent unexport # cd device/driver # ls bind e6e31000.pwm uevent unbind # echo e6e31000.pwm > unbind [ 87.659974] ====================================================== [ 87.666149] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 87.672327] 5.0.0 #7 Not tainted [ 87.675549] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 87.681723] bash/2986 is trying to acquire lock: [ 87.686337] 000000005ea0e178 (kn->count#58){++++}, at: kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0 [ 87.694528] [ 87.694528] but task is already holding lock: [ 87.700353] 000000006313b17c (pwm_lock){+.+.}, at: pwmchip_remove+0x28/0x13c [ 87.707405] [ 87.707405] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 87.707405] [ 87.715574] [ 87.715574] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 87.723048] [ 87.723048] -> #1 (pwm_lock){+.+.}: [ 87.728017] __mutex_lock+0x70/0x7e4 [ 87.732108] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 [ 87.736547] pwm_request_from_chip.part.6+0x34/0x74 [ 87.741940] pwm_request_from_chip+0x20/0x40 [ 87.746725] export_store+0x6c/0x1f4 [ 87.750820] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x28 [ 87.754998] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64 [ 87.759175] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8 [ 87.763615] __vfs_write+0x40/0x184 [ 87.767619] vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c [ 87.771448] ksys_write+0x58/0xbc [ 87.775278] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 [ 87.779721] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124 [ 87.783986] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24 [ 87.788858] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18 [ 87.792947] [ 87.792947] -> #0 (kn->count#58){++++}: [ 87.798260] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x22c [ 87.802353] __kernfs_remove+0x258/0x2c4 [ 87.806790] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0 [ 87.811836] remove_files.isra.1+0x38/0x78 [ 87.816447] sysfs_remove_group+0x48/0x98 [ 87.820971] sysfs_remove_groups+0x34/0x4c [ 87.825583] device_remove_attrs+0x6c/0x7c [ 87.830197] device_del+0x11c/0x33c [ 87.834201] device_unregister+0x14/0x2c [ 87.838638] pwmchip_sysfs_unexport+0x40/0x4c [ 87.843509] pwmchip_remove+0xf4/0x13c [ 87.847773] rcar_pwm_remove+0x28/0x34 [ 87.852039] platform_drv_remove+0x24/0x64 [ 87.856651] device_release_driver_internal+0x18c/0x21c [ 87.862391] device_release_driver+0x14/0x1c [ 87.867175] unbind_store+0xe0/0x124 [ 87.871265] drv_attr_store+0x20/0x30 [ 87.875442] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64 [ 87.879618] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8 [ 87.884055] __vfs_write+0x40/0x184 [ 87.888057] vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c [ 87.891887] ksys_write+0x58/0xbc [ 87.895716] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 [ 87.900154] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124 [ 87.904417] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24 [ 87.909289] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18 [ 87.913378] [ 87.913378] other info that might help us debug this: [ 87.913378] [ 87.921374] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 87.921374] [ 87.927286] CPU0 CPU1 [ 87.931808] ---- ---- [ 87.936331] lock(pwm_lock); [ 87.939293] lock(kn->count#58); [ 87.945120] lock(pwm_lock); [ 87.950599] lock(kn->count#58); [ 87.953908] [ 87.953908] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 87.953908] [ 87.959821] 4 locks held by bash/2986: [ 87.963563] #0: 00000000ace7bc30 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x188/0x19c [ 87.971044] #1: 00000000287991b2 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xb4/0x1e8 [ 87.978872] #2: 00000000f739d016 (&dev->mutex){....}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x40/0x21c [ 87.988001] #3: 000000006313b17c (pwm_lock){+.+.}, at: pwmchip_remove+0x28/0x13c [ 87.995481] [ 87.995481] stack backtrace: [ 87.999836] CPU: 0 PID: 2986 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.0.0 #7 [ 88.005489] Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X board based on r8a7795 ES1.x (DT) [ 88.012791] Call trace: [ 88.015235] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x190 [ 88.018891] show_stack+0x14/0x1c [ 88.022204] dump_stack+0xb0/0xec [ 88.025514] print_circular_bug.isra.32+0x1d0/0x2e0 [ 88.030385] __lock_acquire+0x1318/0x1864 [ 88.034388] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x22c [ 88.037958] __kernfs_remove+0x258/0x2c4 [ 88.041874] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0 [ 88.046398] remove_files.isra.1+0x38/0x78 [ 88.050487] sysfs_remove_group+0x48/0x98 [ 88.054490] sysfs_remove_groups+0x34/0x4c [ 88.058580] device_remove_attrs+0x6c/0x7c [ 88.062671] device_del+0x11c/0x33c [ 88.066154] device_unregister+0x14/0x2c [ 88.070070] pwmchip_sysfs_unexport+0x40/0x4c [ 88.074421] pwmchip_remove+0xf4/0x13c [ 88.078163] rcar_pwm_remove+0x28/0x34 [ 88.081906] platform_drv_remove+0x24/0x64 [ 88.085996] device_release_driver_internal+0x18c/0x21c [ 88.091215] device_release_driver+0x14/0x1c [ 88.095478] unbind_store+0xe0/0x124 [ 88.099048] drv_attr_store+0x20/0x30 [ 88.102704] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64 [ 88.106359] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8 [ 88.110275] __vfs_write+0x40/0x184 [ 88.113757] vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c [ 88.117065] ksys_write+0x58/0xbc [ 88.120374] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 [ 88.124291] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124 [ 88.128034] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24 [ 88.132384] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18 The sysfs unexport in pwmchip_remove() is completely asymmetric to what we do in pwmchip_add_with_polarity() and commit 0733424c9ba9 ("pwm: Unexport children before chip removal") is a strong indication that this was wrong to begin with. We should just move pwmchip_sysfs_unexport() where it belongs, which is right after pwmchip_sysfs_unexport_children(). In that case, we do not need separate functions anymore either. We also really want to remove sysfs irrespective of whether or not the chip will be removed as a result of pwmchip_remove(). We can only assume that the driver will be gone after that, so we shouldn't leave any dangling sysfs files around. This warning disappears if we move pwmchip_sysfs_unexport() to the top of pwmchip_remove(), pwmchip_sysfs_unexport_children(). That way it is also outside of the pwm_lock section, which indeed doesn't seem to be needed. Moving the pwmchip_sysfs_export() call outside of that section also seems fine and it'd be perfectly symmetric with pwmchip_remove() again. So, this patch fixes them. Signed-off-by: Phong Hoang <phong.hoang.wz@renesas.com> [shimoda: revise the commit log and code] Fixes: 76abbdde2d95 ("pwm: Add sysfs interface") Fixes: 0733424c9ba9 ("pwm: Unexport children before chip removal") Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> Tested-by: Hoan Nguyen An <na-hoan@jinso.co.jp> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-03-17Linux 5.1-rc1Linus Torvalds1-2/+2
2019-03-17perf/x86/intel: Make dev_attr_allow_tsx_force_abort statickbuild test robot1-1/+1
Fixes: 400816f60c54 ("perf/x86/intel: Implement support for TSX Force Abort") Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: kbuild-all@01.org Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190313184243.GA10820@lkp-sb-ep06
2019-03-17kconfig: remove stale lxdialog/.gitignoreMasahiro Yamada1-4/+0
When this .gitignore was added, lxdialog was an independent hostprogs-y. Now that all objects in lxdialog/ are directly linked to mconf, the lxdialog is no longer generated. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-03-17kbuild: force all architectures except um to include mandatory-yMasahiro Yamada29-47/+18
Currently, every arch/*/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild explicitly includes the common Kbuild.asm file. Factor out the duplicated include directives to scripts/Makefile.asm-generic so that no architecture would opt out of the mandatory-y mechanism. um is not forced to include mandatory-y since it is a very exceptional case which does not support UAPI. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-03-17kbuild: warn redundant generic-yMasahiro Yamada12-13/+6
The generic-y is redundant under the following condition: - arch has its own implementation - the same header is added to generated-y - the same header is added to mandatory-y If a redundant generic-y is found, the warning like follows is displayed: scripts/Makefile.asm-generic:20: redundant generic-y found in arch/arm/include/asm/Kbuild: timex.h I fixed up arch Kbuild files found by this. Suggested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-03-17Revert "modsign: Abort modules_install when signing fails"Douglas Anderson1-1/+1
This reverts commit caf6fe91ddf62a96401e21e9b7a07227440f4185. The commit was fine but is no longer needed as of commit 3a2429e1faf4 ("kbuild: change if_changed_rule for multi-line recipe"). Let's go back to using ";" to be consistent. For some discussion, see: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAK7LNASde0Q9S5GKeQiWhArfER4S4wL1=R_FW8q0++_X3T5=hQ@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-03-17kbuild: Make NOSTDINC_FLAGS a simply expanded variableDouglas Anderson1-1/+1
During a simple no-op (nothing changed) build I saw 39 invocations of the C compiler with the argument "-print-file-name=include". We don't need to call the C compiler 39 times for this--one time will suffice. Let's change NOSTDINC_FLAGS to a simply expanded variable to avoid this since there doesn't appear to be any reason it should be recursively expanded. On my build this shaved ~400 ms off my "no-op" build. Note that the recursive expansion seems to date back to the (really old) commit e8f5bdb02ce0 ("[PATCH] Makefile include path ordering"). It's a little unclear to me if the point of that patch was to switch the variable to be recursively expanded (which it did) or to avoid directly assigning to NOSTDINC_FLAGS (AKA to switch to +=) because someone else (out of tree?) was setting it. I presume later since if the only goal was to switch to recursive expansion the patch would have just removed the ":". Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-03-17kbuild: deb-pkg: avoid implicit effectsArseny Maslennikov1-1/+4
* The man page for dpkg-source(1) notes: > -b, --build directory [format-specific-parameters] > Build a source package (--build since dpkg 1.17.14). > <...> > > dpkg-source will build the source package with the first > format found in this ordered list: the format indicated > with the --format command line option, the format > indicated in debian/source/format, “1.0”. The fallback > to “1.0” is deprecated and will be removed at some point > in the future, you should always document the desired > source format in debian/source/format. See section > SOURCE PACKAGE FORMATS for an extensive description of > the various source package formats. Thus it would be more foolproof to explicitly use 1.0 (as we always did) than to rely on dpkg-source's defaults. * In a similar vein, debian/rules is not made executable by mkdebian, and dpkg-source warns about that but still silently fixes the file. Let's be explicit once again. Signed-off-by: Arseny Maslennikov <ar@cs.msu.ru> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>