Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
When no alarm has been programmed on RSK-RZA1, an error message is
printed during boot:
rtc rtc0: invalid alarm value: 2019-03-14T255:255:255
sh_rtc_read_alarm_value() returns 0xff when querying a hardware alarm
field that is not enabled. __rtc_read_alarm() validates the received
alarm values, and fills in missing fields when needed.
While 0xff is handled fine for the year, month, and day fields, and
corrected as considered being out-of-range, this is not the case for the
hour, minute, and second fields, where -1 is expected for missing
fields.
Fix this by returning -1 instead, as this value is handled fine for all
fields.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
If we encounter a failure during suspend where this RTC was programmed
to wakeup the system from suspend, but that wakeup couldn't be
configured because the system didn't support wakeup interrupts, we'll
run into the following warning:
Unbalanced IRQ 166 wake disable
WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 3071 at kernel/irq/manage.c:669 irq_set_irq_wake+0x108/0x278
This happens because the suspend process isn't aborted when the RTC
fails to configure the wakeup IRQ. Instead, we continue suspending the
system and then another suspend callback fails the suspend process and
"unwinds" the previously suspended drivers by calling their resume
callbacks. When we get back to resuming this RTC driver, we'll call
disable_irq_wake() on an IRQ that hasn't been configured for wake.
Let's just fail suspend/resume here if we can't configure the system to
wake and the user has chosen to wakeup with this device. This fixes this
warning and makes the code more robust in case there are systems out
there that can't wakeup from suspend on this line but the user has
chosen to do so.
Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Acked-By: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
|
|
|
|
Fixes: 400816f60c54 ("perf/x86/intel: Implement support for TSX Force Abort")
Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190313184243.GA10820@lkp-sb-ep06
|
|
When this .gitignore was added, lxdialog was an independent hostprogs-y.
Now that all objects in lxdialog/ are directly linked to mconf, the
lxdialog is no longer generated.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Currently, every arch/*/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild explicitly includes
the common Kbuild.asm file. Factor out the duplicated include directives
to scripts/Makefile.asm-generic so that no architecture would opt out
of the mandatory-y mechanism.
um is not forced to include mandatory-y since it is a very exceptional
case which does not support UAPI.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
The generic-y is redundant under the following condition:
- arch has its own implementation
- the same header is added to generated-y
- the same header is added to mandatory-y
If a redundant generic-y is found, the warning like follows is displayed:
scripts/Makefile.asm-generic:20: redundant generic-y found in arch/arm/include/asm/Kbuild: timex.h
I fixed up arch Kbuild files found by this.
Suggested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
This reverts commit caf6fe91ddf62a96401e21e9b7a07227440f4185.
The commit was fine but is no longer needed as of commit 3a2429e1faf4
("kbuild: change if_changed_rule for multi-line recipe"). Let's go
back to using ";" to be consistent.
For some discussion, see:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAK7LNASde0Q9S5GKeQiWhArfER4S4wL1=R_FW8q0++_X3T5=hQ@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
During a simple no-op (nothing changed) build I saw 39 invocations of
the C compiler with the argument "-print-file-name=include". We don't
need to call the C compiler 39 times for this--one time will suffice.
Let's change NOSTDINC_FLAGS to a simply expanded variable to avoid
this since there doesn't appear to be any reason it should be
recursively expanded.
On my build this shaved ~400 ms off my "no-op" build.
Note that the recursive expansion seems to date back to the (really
old) commit e8f5bdb02ce0 ("[PATCH] Makefile include path ordering").
It's a little unclear to me if the point of that patch was to switch
the variable to be recursively expanded (which it did) or to avoid
directly assigning to NOSTDINC_FLAGS (AKA to switch to +=) because
someone else (out of tree?) was setting it. I presume later since if
the only goal was to switch to recursive expansion the patch would
have just removed the ":".
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
* The man page for dpkg-source(1) notes:
> -b, --build directory [format-specific-parameters]
> Build a source package (--build since dpkg 1.17.14).
> <...>
>
> dpkg-source will build the source package with the first
> format found in this ordered list: the format indicated
> with the --format command line option, the format
> indicated in debian/source/format, “1.0”. The fallback
> to “1.0” is deprecated and will be removed at some point
> in the future, you should always document the desired
> source format in debian/source/format. See section
> SOURCE PACKAGE FORMATS for an extensive description of
> the various source package formats.
Thus it would be more foolproof to explicitly use 1.0 (as we always
did) than to rely on dpkg-source's defaults.
* In a similar vein, debian/rules is not made executable by mkdebian,
and dpkg-source warns about that but still silently fixes the file.
Let's be explicit once again.
Signed-off-by: Arseny Maslennikov <ar@cs.msu.ru>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|