aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstatshomepage
path: root/tools/perf/scripts/python/export-to-postgresql.py (unfollow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-03-06selftests/bpf: Split test_attach_probe into multi subtestsMenglong Dong3-101/+205
In order to adapt to the older kernel, now we split the "attach_probe" testing into multi subtests: manual // manual attach tests for kprobe/uprobe auto // auto-attach tests for kprobe and uprobe kprobe-sleepable // kprobe sleepable test uprobe-lib // uprobe tests for library function by name uprobe-sleepable // uprobe sleepable test uprobe-ref_ctr // uprobe ref_ctr test As sleepable kprobe needs to set BPF_F_SLEEPABLE flag before loading, we need to move it to a stand alone skel file, in case of it is not supported by kernel and make the whole loading fail. Therefore, we can only enable part of the subtests for older kernel. Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Biao Jiang <benbjiang@tencent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230306064833.7932-3-imagedong@tencent.com
2023-03-06libbpf: Add support to set kprobe/uprobe attach modeMenglong Dong2-14/+84
By default, libbpf will attach the kprobe/uprobe BPF program in the latest mode that supported by kernel. In this patch, we add the support to let users manually attach kprobe/uprobe in legacy or perf mode. There are 3 mode that supported by the kernel to attach kprobe/uprobe: LEGACY: create perf event in legacy way and don't use bpf_link PERF: create perf event with perf_event_open() and don't use bpf_link Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Biao Jiang <benbjiang@tencent.com> Link: create perf event with perf_event_open() and use bpf_link Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230113093427.1666466-1-imagedong@tencent.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230306064833.7932-2-imagedong@tencent.com Users now can manually choose the mode with bpf_program__attach_uprobe_opts()/bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts().
2023-03-06tools/resolve_btfids: Add /libsubcmd to .gitignoreRong Tao1-0/+1
Add libsubcmd to .gitignore, otherwise after compiling the kernel it would result in the following: # bpf-next...bpf-next/master ?? tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/libsubcmd/ Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/tencent_F13D670D5D7AA9C4BD868D3220921AAC090A@qq.com
2023-03-04bpf: add support for fixed-size memory pointer returns for kfuncsAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+8
Support direct fixed-size (and for now, read-only) memory access when kfunc's return type is a pointer to non-struct type. Calculate type size and let BPF program access that many bytes directly. This is crucial for numbers iterator. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302235015.2044271-13-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-04bpf: generalize dynptr_get_spi to be usable for itersAndrii Nakryiko1-6/+12
Generalize the logic of fetching special stack slot object state using spi (stack slot index). This will be used by STACK_ITER logic next. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302235015.2044271-12-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-04bpf: mark PTR_TO_MEM as non-null register typeAndrii Nakryiko1-1/+2
PTR_TO_MEM register without PTR_MAYBE_NULL is indeed non-null. This is important for BPF verifier to be able to prune guaranteed not to be taken branches. This is always the case with open-coded iterators. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302235015.2044271-11-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-04bpf: move kfunc_call_arg_meta higher in the fileAndrii Nakryiko1-35/+35
Move struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta higher in the file and put it next to struct bpf_call_arg_meta, so it can be used from more functions. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302235015.2044271-10-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-04bpf: ensure that r0 is marked scratched after any function callAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+2
r0 is important (unless called function is void-returning, but that's taken care of by print_verifier_state() anyways) in verifier logs. Currently for helpers we seem to print it in verifier log, but for kfuncs we don't. Instead of figuring out where in the maze of code we accidentally set r0 as scratched for helpers and why we don't do that for kfuncs, just enforce that after any function call r0 is marked as scratched. Also, perhaps, we should reconsider "scratched" terminology, as it's mightily confusing. "Touched" would seem more appropriate. But I left that for follow ups for now. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302235015.2044271-9-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-04bpf: fix visit_insn()'s detection of BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback helperAndrii Nakryiko1-1/+1
It's not correct to assume that any BPF_CALL instruction is a helper call. Fix visit_insn()'s detection of bpf_timer_set_callback() helper by also checking insn->code == 0. For kfuncs insn->code would be set to BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, and for subprog calls it will be BPF_PSEUDO_CALL. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302235015.2044271-8-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-04bpf: clean up visit_insn()'s instruction processingAndrii Nakryiko1-13/+12
Instead of referencing processed instruction repeatedly as insns[t] throughout entire visit_insn() function, take a local insn pointer and work with it in a cleaner way. It makes enhancing this function further a bit easier as well. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302235015.2044271-7-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-04selftests/bpf: adjust log_fixup's buffer size for proper truncationAndrii Nakryiko1-1/+1
Adjust log_fixup's expected buffer length to fix the test. It's pretty finicky in its length expectation, but it doesn't break often. So just adjust the length to work on current kernel and with follow up iterator changes as well. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302235015.2044271-6-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-04bpf: honor env->test_state_freq flag in is_state_visited()Andrii Nakryiko1-1/+2
env->test_state_freq flag can be set by user by passing BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ program flag. This is used in a bunch of selftests to have predictable state checkpoints at every jump and so on. Currently, bounded loop handling heuristic ignores this flag if number of processed jumps and/or number of processed instructions is below some thresholds, which throws off that reliable state checkpointing. Honor this flag in all circumstances by disabling heuristic if env->test_state_freq is set. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302235015.2044271-5-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-04selftests/bpf: enhance align selftest's expected log matchingAndrii Nakryiko1-6/+12
Allow to search for expected register state in all the verifier log output that's related to specified instruction number. See added comment for an example of possible situation that is happening due to a simple enhancement done in the next patch, which fixes handling of env->test_state_freq flag in state checkpointing logic. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302235015.2044271-4-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-04bpf: improve regsafe() checks for PTR_TO_{MEM,BUF,TP_BUFFER}Andrii Nakryiko1-1/+5
Teach regsafe() logic to handle PTR_TO_MEM, PTR_TO_BUF, and PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER similarly to PTR_TO_MAP_{KEY,VALUE}. That is, instead of exact match for var_off and range, use tnum_in() and range_within() checks, allowing more general verified state to subsume more specific current state. This allows to match wider range of valid and safe states, speeding up verification and detecting wider range of equivalent states for upcoming open-coded iteration looping logic. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302235015.2044271-3-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-04bpf: improve stack slot state printingAndrii Nakryiko1-26/+49
Improve stack slot state printing to provide more useful and relevant information, especially for dynptrs. While previously we'd see something like: 8: (85) call bpf_ringbuf_reserve_dynptr#198 ; R0_w=scalar() fp-8_w=dddddddd fp-16_w=dddddddd refs=2 Now we'll see way more useful: 8: (85) call bpf_ringbuf_reserve_dynptr#198 ; R0_w=scalar() fp-16_w=dynptr_ringbuf(ref_id=2) refs=2 I experimented with printing the range of slots taken by dynptr, something like: fp-16..8_w=dynptr_ringbuf(ref_id=2) But it felt very awkward and pretty useless. So we print the lowest address (most negative offset) only. The general structure of this code is now also set up for easier extension and will accommodate ITER slots naturally. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302235015.2044271-2-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-03selftests/bpf: Disassembler tests for verifier.c:convert_ctx_access()Eduard Zingerman4-1/+920
Function verifier.c:convert_ctx_access() applies some rewrites to BPF instructions that read or write BPF program context. This commit adds machinery to allow test cases that inspect BPF program after these rewrites are applied. An example of a test case: { // Shorthand for field offset and size specification N(CGROUP_SOCKOPT, struct bpf_sockopt, retval), // Pattern generated for field read .read = "$dst = *(u64 *)($ctx + bpf_sockopt_kern::current_task);" "$dst = *(u64 *)($dst + task_struct::bpf_ctx);" "$dst = *(u32 *)($dst + bpf_cg_run_ctx::retval);", // Pattern generated for field write .write = "*(u64 *)($ctx + bpf_sockopt_kern::tmp_reg) = r9;" "r9 = *(u64 *)($ctx + bpf_sockopt_kern::current_task);" "r9 = *(u64 *)(r9 + task_struct::bpf_ctx);" "*(u32 *)(r9 + bpf_cg_run_ctx::retval) = $src;" "r9 = *(u64 *)($ctx + bpf_sockopt_kern::tmp_reg);" , }, For each test case, up to three programs are created: - One that uses BPF_LDX_MEM to read the context field. - One that uses BPF_STX_MEM to write to the context field. - One that uses BPF_ST_MEM to write to the context field. The disassembly of each program is compared with the pattern specified in the test case. Kernel code for disassembly is reused (as is in the bpftool). To keep Makefile changes to the minimum, symbolic links to `kernel/bpf/disasm.c` and `kernel/bpf/disasm.h ` are added. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304011247.566040-4-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-03selftests/bpf: test if pointer type is tracked for BPF_ST_MEMEduard Zingerman1-0/+23
Check that verifier tracks pointer types for BPF_ST_MEM instructions and reports error if pointer types do not match for different execution branches. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304011247.566040-3-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-03bpf: allow ctx writes using BPF_ST_MEM instructionEduard Zingerman4-123/+126
Lift verifier restriction to use BPF_ST_MEM instructions to write to context data structures. This requires the following changes: - verifier.c:do_check() for BPF_ST updated to: - no longer forbid writes to registers of type PTR_TO_CTX; - track dst_reg type in the env->insn_aux_data[...].ptr_type field (same way it is done for BPF_STX and BPF_LDX instructions). - verifier.c:convert_ctx_access() and various callbacks invoked by it are updated to handled BPF_ST instruction alongside BPF_STX. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304011247.566040-2-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-03bpf: Use separate RCU callbacks for freeing selemKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi2-36/+49
Martin suggested that instead of using a byte in the hole (which he has a use for in his future patch) in bpf_local_storage_elem, we can dispatch a different call_rcu callback based on whether we need to free special fields in bpf_local_storage_elem data. The free path, described in commit 9db44fdd8105 ("bpf: Support kptrs in local storage maps"), only waits for call_rcu callbacks when there are special (kptrs, etc.) fields in the map value, hence it is necessary that we only access smap in this case. Therefore, dispatch different RCU callbacks based on the BPF map has a valid btf_record, which dereference and use smap's btf_record only when it is valid. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303141542.300068-1-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2023-03-03bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.Alexei Starovoitov12-110/+173
bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock() are only available in clang compiled kernels. Lack of such key mechanism makes it impossible for sleepable bpf programs to use RCU pointers. Allow bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock() in GCC compiled kernels (though GCC doesn't support btf_type_tag yet) and allowlist certain field dereferences in important data structures like tast_struct, cgroup, socket that are used by sleepable programs either as RCU pointer or full trusted pointer (which is valid outside of RCU CS). Use BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU and BTF_TYPE_SAFE_TRUSTED macros for such tagging. They will be removed once GCC supports btf_type_tag. With that refactor check_ptr_to_btf_access(). Make it strict in enforcing PTR_TRUSTED and PTR_UNTRUSTED while deprecating old PTR_TO_BTF_ID without modifier flags. There is a chance that this strict enforcement might break existing programs (especially on GCC compiled kernels), but this cleanup has to start sooner than later. Note PTR_TO_CTX access still yields old deprecated PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Once it's converted to strict PTR_TRUSTED or PTR_UNTRUSTED the kfuncs and helpers will be able to default to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS. KF_RCU will remain as a weaker version of KF_TRUSTED_ARGS where obj refcnt could be 0. Adjust rcu_read_lock selftest to run on gcc and clang compiled kernels. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230303041446.3630-7-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2023-03-03selftests/bpf: Tweak cgroup kfunc test.Alexei Starovoitov1-1/+11
Adjust cgroup kfunc test to dereference RCU protected cgroup pointer as PTR_TRUSTED and pass into KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfunc. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230303041446.3630-6-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2023-03-03selftests/bpf: Add a test case for kptr_rcu.Alexei Starovoitov1-0/+12
Tweak existing map_kptr test to check kptr_rcu. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230303041446.3630-5-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2023-03-03bpf: Introduce kptr_rcu.Alexei Starovoitov9-23/+65
The life time of certain kernel structures like 'struct cgroup' is protected by RCU. Hence it's safe to dereference them directly from __kptr tagged pointers in bpf maps. The resulting pointer is MEM_RCU and can be passed to kfuncs that expect KF_RCU. Derefrence of other kptr-s returns PTR_UNTRUSTED. For example: struct map_value { struct cgroup __kptr *cgrp; }; SEC("tp_btf/cgroup_mkdir") int BPF_PROG(test_cgrp_get_ancestors, struct cgroup *cgrp_arg, const char *path) { struct cgroup *cg, *cg2; cg = bpf_cgroup_acquire(cgrp_arg); // cg is PTR_TRUSTED and ref_obj_id > 0 bpf_kptr_xchg(&v->cgrp, cg); cg2 = v->cgrp; // This is new feature introduced by this patch. // cg2 is PTR_MAYBE_NULL | MEM_RCU. // When cg2 != NULL, it's a valid cgroup, but its percpu_ref could be zero if (cg2) bpf_cgroup_ancestor(cg2, level); // safe to do. } Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230303041446.3630-4-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2023-03-03bpf: Mark cgroups and dfl_cgrp fields as trusted.Alexei Starovoitov1-0/+6
bpf programs sometimes do: bpf_cgrp_storage_get(&map, task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp, ...); It is safe to do, because cgroups->dfl_cgrp pointer is set diring init and never changes. The task->cgroups is also never NULL. It is also set during init and will change when task switches cgroups. For any trusted task pointer dereference of cgroups and dfl_cgrp should yield trusted pointers. The verifier wasn't aware of this. Hence in gcc compiled kernels task->cgroups dereference was producing PTR_TO_BTF_ID without modifiers while in clang compiled kernels the verifier recognizes __rcu tag in cgroups field and produces PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_RCU | MAYBE_NULL. Tag cgroups and dfl_cgrp as trusted to equalize clang and gcc behavior. When GCC supports btf_type_tag such tagging will done directly in the type. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230303041446.3630-3-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2023-03-03bpf: Rename __kptr_ref -> __kptr and __kptr -> __kptr_untrusted.Alexei Starovoitov14-30/+30
__kptr meant to store PTR_UNTRUSTED kernel pointers inside bpf maps. The concept felt useful, but didn't get much traction, since bpf_rdonly_cast() was added soon after and bpf programs received a simpler way to access PTR_UNTRUSTED kernel pointers without going through restrictive __kptr usage. Rename __kptr_ref -> __kptr and __kptr -> __kptr_untrusted to indicate its intended usage. The main goal of __kptr_untrusted was to read/write such pointers directly while bpf_kptr_xchg was a mechanism to access refcnted kernel pointers. The next patch will allow RCU protected __kptr access with direct read. At that point __kptr_untrusted will be deprecated. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230303041446.3630-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2023-03-02selftests/bpf: Add absolute timer testTero Kristo2-0/+48
Add test for the absolute BPF timer under the existing timer tests. This will run the timer two times with 1us expiration time, and then re-arm the timer at ~35s in the future. At the end, it is verified that the absolute timer expired exactly two times. Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302114614.2985072-3-tero.kristo@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-02bpf: Add support for absolute value BPF timersTero Kristo3-2/+39
Add a new flag BPF_F_TIMER_ABS that can be passed to bpf_timer_start() to start an absolute value timer instead of the default relative value. This makes the timer expire at an exact point in time, instead of a time with latencies induced by both the BPF and timer subsystems. Suggested-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302114614.2985072-2-tero.kristo@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-02selftests/bpf: Add -Wuninitialized flag to bpf prog flagsDave Marchevsky6-11/+14
Per C99 standard [0], Section 6.7.8, Paragraph 10: If an object that has automatic storage duration is not initialized explicitly, its value is indeterminate. And in the same document, in appendix "J.2 Undefined behavior": The behavior is undefined in the following circumstances: [...] The value of an object with automatic storage duration is used while it is indeterminate (6.2.4, 6.7.8, 6.8). This means that use of an uninitialized stack variable is undefined behavior, and therefore that clang can choose to do a variety of scary things, such as not generating bytecode for "bunch of useful code" in the below example: void some_func() { int i; if (!i) return; // bunch of useful code } To add insult to injury, if some_func above is a helper function for some BPF program, clang can choose to not generate an "exit" insn, causing verifier to fail with "last insn is not an exit or jmp". Going from that verification failure to the root cause of uninitialized use is certain to be frustrating. This patch adds -Wuninitialized to the cflags for selftest BPF progs and fixes up existing instances of uninitialized use. [0]: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG14/www/docs/n1256.pdf Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303005500.1614874-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-02bpf: Make bpf_get_current_[ancestor_]cgroup_id() available for all program typesTejun Heo4-14/+4
These helpers are safe to call from any context and there's no reason to restrict access to them. Remove them from bpf_trace and filter lists and add to bpf_base_func_proto() under perfmon_capable(). v2: After consulting with Andrii, relocated in bpf_base_func_proto() so that they require bpf_capable() but not perfomon_capable() as it doesn't read from or affect others on the system. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZAD8QyoszMZiTzBY@slm.duckdns.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-02bpf, docs: Fix final bpf docs build failureDavid Vernet1-3/+4
maps.rst in the BPF documentation links to the /userspace-api/ebpf/syscall document (Documentation/userspace-api/ebpf/syscall.rst). For some reason, if you try to reference the document with :doc:, the docs build emits the following warning: ./Documentation/bpf/maps.rst:13: WARNING: \ unknown document: '/userspace-api/ebpf/syscall' It appears that other places in the docs tree also don't support using :doc:. Elsewhere in the BPF documentation, we just reference the kernel docs page directly. Let's do that here to clean up the last remaining noise in the docs build. Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302183918.54190-2-void@manifault.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-02bpf, docs: Fix link to netdev-FAQ targetDavid Vernet1-7/+7
The BPF devel Q&A documentation page makes frequent reference to the netdev-QA page via the netdev-FAQ rst link. This link is currently broken, as is evidenced by the build output when making BPF docs: ./Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst:150: WARNING: undefined label: 'netdev-faq' ./Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst:206: WARNING: undefined label: 'netdev-faq' ./Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst:231: WARNING: undefined label: 'netdev-faq' ./Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst:396: WARNING: undefined label: 'netdev-faq' ./Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst:412: WARNING: undefined label: 'netdev-faq' Fix the links to point to the actual netdev-faq page. Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302183918.54190-1-void@manifault.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-01bpf: Fix bpf_dynptr_slice{_rdwr} to return NULL instead of 0Joanne Koong1-4/+4
Change bpf_dynptr_slice and bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr to return NULL instead of 0, in accordance with the codebase guidelines. Fixes: 66e3a13e7c2c ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_slice and bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230302053014.1726219-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com
2023-03-01libbpf: Add support for attaching uprobes to shared objects in APKsDaniel Müller1-7/+84
This change adds support for attaching uprobes to shared objects located in APKs, which is relevant for Android systems where various libraries may reside in APKs. To make that happen, we extend the syntax for the "binary path" argument to attach to with that supported by various Android tools: <archive>!/<binary-in-archive> For example: /system/app/test-app/test-app.apk!/lib/arm64-v8a/libc++_shared.so APKs need to be specified via full path, i.e., we do not attempt to resolve mere file names by searching system directories. We cannot currently test this functionality end-to-end in an automated fashion, because it relies on an Android system being present, but there is no support for that in CI. I have tested the functionality manually, by creating a libbpf program containing a uretprobe, attaching it to a function inside a shared object inside an APK, and verifying the sanity of the returned values. Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230301212308.1839139-4-deso@posteo.net
2023-03-01libbpf: Introduce elf_find_func_offset_from_file() functionDaniel Müller1-21/+36
This change splits the elf_find_func_offset() function in two: elf_find_func_offset(), which now accepts an already opened Elf object instead of a path to a file that is to be opened, as well as elf_find_func_offset_from_file(), which opens a binary based on a path and then invokes elf_find_func_offset() on the Elf object. Having this split in responsibilities will allow us to call elf_find_func_offset() from other code paths on Elf objects that did not necessarily come from a file on disk. Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230301212308.1839139-3-deso@posteo.net
2023-03-01libbpf: Implement basic zip archive parsing supportDaniel Müller3-1/+376
This change implements support for reading zip archives, including opening an archive, finding an entry based on its path and name in it, and closing it. The code was copied from https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/pull/4440, which implements similar functionality for bcc. The author confirmed that he is fine with this usage and the corresponding relicensing. I adjusted it to adhere to libbpf coding standards. Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Michał Gregorczyk <michalgr@meta.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230301212308.1839139-2-deso@posteo.net
2023-03-01bpf, docs: Fix __uninit kfunc doc sectionDavid Vernet1-1/+1
In commit d96d937d7c5c ("bpf: Add __uninit kfunc annotation"), the __uninit kfunc annotation was documented in kfuncs.rst. You have to fully underline a section in rst, or the build will issue a warning that the title underline is too short: ./Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst:104: WARNING: Title underline too short. 2.2.2 __uninit Annotation -------------------- This patch fixes that title underline. Fixes: d96d937d7c5c ("bpf: Add __uninit kfunc annotation") Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301194910.602738-2-void@manifault.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-01bpf: Fix doxygen comments for dynptr slice kfuncsDavid Vernet1-16/+14
In commit 66e3a13e7c2c ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_slice and bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr"), the bpf_dynptr_slice() and bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr() kfuncs were added to BPF. These kfuncs included doxygen headers, but unfortunately those headers are not properly formatted according to [0], and causes the following warnings during the docs build: ./kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2225: warning: \ Excess function parameter 'returns' description in 'bpf_dynptr_slice' ./kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2303: warning: \ Excess function parameter 'returns' description in 'bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr' ... This patch fixes those doxygen comments. [0]: https://docs.kernel.org/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html#function-documentation Fixes: 66e3a13e7c2c ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_slice and bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr") Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301194910.602738-1-void@manifault.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-01selftests/bpf: Support custom per-test flags and multiple expected messagesAndrii Nakryiko3-9/+84
Extend __flag attribute by allowing to specify one of the following: * BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT * BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT * BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 * BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ * BPF_F_SLEEPABLE * BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS * Some numeric value Extend __msg attribute by allowing to specify multiple exepcted messages. All messages are expected to be present in the verifier log in the order of application. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230301175417.3146070-2-eddyz87@gmail.com [ Eduard: added commit message, formatting, comments ]
2023-03-01libbpf: Cleanup linker_append_elf_relosViktor Malik1-9/+2
Clang Static Analyser (scan-build) reports some unused symbols and dead assignments in the linker_append_elf_relos function. Clean these up. Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/c5c8fe9f411b69afada8399d23bb048ef2a70535.1677658777.git.vmalik@redhat.com
2023-03-01libbpf: Remove several dead assignmentsViktor Malik3-6/+0
Clang Static Analyzer (scan-build) reports several dead assignments in libbpf where the assigned value is unconditionally overridden by another value before it is read. Remove these assignments. Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/5503d18966583e55158471ebbb2f67374b11bf5e.1677658777.git.vmalik@redhat.com
2023-03-01libbpf: Remove unnecessary ternary operatorViktor Malik1-1/+1
Coverity reports that the first check of 'err' in bpf_object__init_maps is always false as 'err' is initialized to 0 at that point. Remove the unnecessary ternary operator. Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/78a3702f2ea9f32a84faaae9b674c56269d330a7.1677658777.git.vmalik@redhat.com
2023-03-01selftests/bpf: Set __BITS_PER_LONG if target is bpf for LoongArchTiezhu Yang1-1/+2
If target is bpf, there is no __loongarch__ definition, __BITS_PER_LONG defaults to 32, __NR_nanosleep is not defined: #if defined(__ARCH_WANT_TIME32_SYSCALLS) || __BITS_PER_LONG != 32 #define __NR_nanosleep 101 __SC_3264(__NR_nanosleep, sys_nanosleep_time32, sys_nanosleep) #endif Work around this problem, by explicitly setting __BITS_PER_LONG to __loongarch_grlen which is defined by compiler as 64 for LA64. This is similar with commit 36e70b9b06bf ("selftests, bpf: Fix broken riscv build"). Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1677585781-21628-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
2023-03-01selftests/bpf: Add more tests for kptrs in mapsKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi3-65/+451
Firstly, ensure programs successfully load when using all of the supported maps. Then, extend existing tests to test more cases at runtime. We are currently testing both the synchronous freeing of items and asynchronous destruction when map is freed, but the code needs to be adjusted a bit to be able to also accomodate support for percpu maps. We now do a delete on the item (and update for array maps which has a similar effect for kptrs) to perform a synchronous free of the kptr, and test destruction both for the synchronous and asynchronous deletion. Next time the program runs, it should observe the refcount as 1 since all existing references should have been released by then. By running the program after both possible paths freeing kptrs, we establish that they correctly release resources. Next, we augment the existing test to also test the same code path shared by all local storage maps using a task local storage map. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230225154010.391965-4-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-01bpf: Support kptrs in local storage mapsKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi4-9/+63
Enable support for kptrs in local storage maps by wiring up the freeing of these kptrs from map value. Freeing of bpf_local_storage_map is only delayed in case there are special fields, therefore bpf_selem_free_* path can also only dereference smap safely in that case. This is recorded using a bool utilizing a hole in bpF_local_storage_elem. It could have been tagged in the pointer value smap using the lowest bit (since alignment > 1), but since there was already a hole I went with the simpler option. Only the map structure freeing is delayed using RCU barriers, as the buckets aren't used when selem is being freed, so they can be freed once all readers of the bucket lists can no longer access it. Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230225154010.391965-3-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-01bpf: Support kptrs in percpu hashmap and percpu LRU hashmapKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi2-22/+39
Enable support for kptrs in percpu BPF hashmap and percpu BPF LRU hashmap by wiring up the freeing of these kptrs from percpu map elements. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230225154010.391965-2-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-01selftests/bpf: tests for using dynptrs to parse skb and xdp buffersJoanne Koong15-23/+2522
Test skb and xdp dynptr functionality in the following ways: 1) progs/test_cls_redirect_dynptr.c * Rewrite "progs/test_cls_redirect.c" test to use dynptrs to parse skb data * This is a great example of how dynptrs can be used to simplify a lot of the parsing logic for non-statically known values. When measuring the user + system time between the original version vs. using dynptrs, and averaging the time for 10 runs (using "time ./test_progs -t cls_redirect"): original version: 0.092 sec with dynptrs: 0.078 sec 2) progs/test_xdp_dynptr.c * Rewrite "progs/test_xdp.c" test to use dynptrs to parse xdp data When measuring the user + system time between the original version vs. using dynptrs, and averaging the time for 10 runs (using "time ./test_progs -t xdp_attach"): original version: 0.118 sec with dynptrs: 0.094 sec 3) progs/test_l4lb_noinline_dynptr.c * Rewrite "progs/test_l4lb_noinline.c" test to use dynptrs to parse skb data When measuring the user + system time between the original version vs. using dynptrs, and averaging the time for 10 runs (using "time ./test_progs -t l4lb_all"): original version: 0.062 sec with dynptrs: 0.081 sec For number of processed verifier instructions: original version: 6268 insns with dynptrs: 2588 insns 4) progs/test_parse_tcp_hdr_opt_dynptr.c * Add sample code for parsing tcp hdr opt lookup using dynptrs. This logic is lifted from a real-world use case of packet parsing in katran [0], a layer 4 load balancer. The original version "progs/test_parse_tcp_hdr_opt.c" (not using dynptrs) is included here as well, for comparison. When measuring the user + system time between the original version vs. using dynptrs, and averaging the time for 10 runs (using "time ./test_progs -t parse_tcp_hdr_opt"): original version: 0.031 sec with dynptrs: 0.045 sec 5) progs/dynptr_success.c * Add test case "test_skb_readonly" for testing attempts at writes on a prog type with read-only skb ctx. * Add "test_dynptr_skb_data" for testing that bpf_dynptr_data isn't supported for skb progs. 6) progs/dynptr_fail.c * Add test cases "skb_invalid_data_slice{1,2,3,4}" and "xdp_invalid_data_slice{1,2}" for testing that helpers that modify the underlying packet buffer automatically invalidate the associated data slice. * Add test cases "skb_invalid_ctx" and "xdp_invalid_ctx" for testing that prog types that do not support bpf_dynptr_from_skb/xdp don't have access to the API. * Add test case "dynptr_slice_var_len{1,2}" for testing that variable-sized len can't be passed in to bpf_dynptr_slice * Add test case "skb_invalid_slice_write" for testing that writes to a read-only data slice are rejected by the verifier. * Add test case "data_slice_out_of_bounds_skb" for testing that writes to an area outside the slice are rejected. * Add test case "invalid_slice_rdwr_rdonly" for testing that prog types that don't allow writes to packet data don't accept any calls to bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr. [0] https://github.com/facebookincubator/katran/blob/main/katran/lib/bpf/pckt_parsing.h Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-11-joannelkoong@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-01bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_slice and bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwrJoanne Koong6-7/+288
Two new kfuncs are added, bpf_dynptr_slice and bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr. The user must pass in a buffer to store the contents of the data slice if a direct pointer to the data cannot be obtained. For skb and xdp type dynptrs, these two APIs are the only way to obtain a data slice. However, for other types of dynptrs, there is no difference between bpf_dynptr_slice(_rdwr) and bpf_dynptr_data. For skb type dynptrs, the data is copied into the user provided buffer if any of the data is not in the linear portion of the skb. For xdp type dynptrs, the data is copied into the user provided buffer if the data is between xdp frags. If the skb is cloned and a call to bpf_dynptr_data_rdwr is made, then the skb will be uncloned (see bpf_unclone_prologue()). Please note that any bpf_dynptr_write() automatically invalidates any prior data slices of the skb dynptr. This is because the skb may be cloned or may need to pull its paged buffer into the head. As such, any bpf_dynptr_write() will automatically have its prior data slices invalidated, even if the write is to data in the skb head of an uncloned skb. Please note as well that any other helper calls that change the underlying packet buffer (eg bpf_skb_pull_data()) invalidates any data slices of the skb dynptr as well, for the same reasons. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-10-joannelkoong@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-01bpf: Add xdp dynptrsJoanne Koong7-6/+76
Add xdp dynptrs, which are dynptrs whose underlying pointer points to a xdp_buff. The dynptr acts on xdp data. xdp dynptrs have two main benefits. One is that they allow operations on sizes that are not statically known at compile-time (eg variable-sized accesses). Another is that parsing the packet data through dynptrs (instead of through direct access of xdp->data and xdp->data_end) can be more ergonomic and less brittle (eg does not need manual if checking for being within bounds of data_end). For reads and writes on the dynptr, this includes reading/writing from/to and across fragments. Data slices through the bpf_dynptr_data API are not supported; instead bpf_dynptr_slice() and bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr() should be used. For examples of how xdp dynptrs can be used, please see the attached selftests. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-9-joannelkoong@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-01bpf: Add skb dynptrsJoanne Koong8-19/+261
Add skb dynptrs, which are dynptrs whose underlying pointer points to a skb. The dynptr acts on skb data. skb dynptrs have two main benefits. One is that they allow operations on sizes that are not statically known at compile-time (eg variable-sized accesses). Another is that parsing the packet data through dynptrs (instead of through direct access of skb->data and skb->data_end) can be more ergonomic and less brittle (eg does not need manual if checking for being within bounds of data_end). For bpf prog types that don't support writes on skb data, the dynptr is read-only (bpf_dynptr_write() will return an error) For reads and writes through the bpf_dynptr_read() and bpf_dynptr_write() interfaces, reading and writing from/to data in the head as well as from/to non-linear paged buffers is supported. Data slices through the bpf_dynptr_data API are not supported; instead bpf_dynptr_slice() and bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr() (added in subsequent commit) should be used. For examples of how skb dynptrs can be used, please see the attached selftests. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-8-joannelkoong@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-03-01bpf: Add __uninit kfunc annotationJoanne Koong2-2/+33
This patch adds __uninit as a kfunc annotation. This will be useful for scenarios such as for example in dynptrs, indicating whether the dynptr should be checked by the verifier as an initialized or an uninitialized dynptr. Without this annotation, the alternative would be needing to hard-code in the verifier the specific kfunc to indicate that arg should be treated as an uninitialized arg. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-7-joannelkoong@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>