| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The documentation is referring to the legacy enumeration of the SPI
host controllers and target devices. It has nothing to do with the
modern way, which is the only supported in kernel right now. Hence,
remove outdated documentation file.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240417110334.2671228-5-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
There is no user of the linux/spi/pxa2xx_spi.h. Move its contents
to the drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.h.
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240417110334.2671228-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
Since driver can parse num-cs device property, replace platform data
with this new approach. This pursues the following objectives:
- getting rid of the public header that barely used outside of
the SPI subsystem (more specifically the SPI PXA2xx drivers)
- making a trampoline for the driver to support non-default number
of the chip select pins in case the original code is going to be
converted to Device Tree model
It's not expected to have more users in board files except this one.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240417110334.2671228-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
In some cases the number of the chip select pins might come from
the device property. Allow driver to use it.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240417110334.2671228-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
There are macros spi_valid_txbuf() and spi_valid_rxbuf() for determining
if an xfer actually intended to send or receive data.
These checks were hard-coded in spi_statistics_add_transfer_stats(). We
can make use of the macros instead to make the code more readable and
more robust against potential future changes in case the definition of
what valid means changes.
The macro takes the spi_message as an argument, so we need to change
spi_statistics_add_transfer_stats() to take the spi_message as an
argument instead of the controller.
Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240430201530.2138095-3-dlechner@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.
Fix to the proper variable type 'unsigned long' while here.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240430114142.28551-9-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.
Fix to the proper variable type 'unsigned long' while here.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240430114142.28551-8-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.
Fix to the proper variable type 'unsigned long' while here.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240430114142.28551-7-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240430114142.28551-6-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240430114142.28551-5-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240430114142.28551-4-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240430114142.28551-3-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.
Fix to the proper variable type 'unsigned long' while here.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240430114142.28551-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
Andy Shevchenko
David Lechner
Wolfram Sang